The impact of subjective social status, inequality perceptions, and inequality tolerance on demand for redistribution. The case of a highly unequal society

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/03796205.2022.2126998
Frederich Kirsten, I. Botha, Biyase Mduduzi, M. Pretorius
{"title":"The impact of subjective social status, inequality perceptions, and inequality tolerance on demand for redistribution. The case of a highly unequal society","authors":"Frederich Kirsten, I. Botha, Biyase Mduduzi, M. Pretorius","doi":"10.1080/03796205.2022.2126998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The international literature shows that demand for redistribution is influenced by subjective factors like perceptions of inequality and individuals’ perceived social status. However, few have assessed these subjective dynamics in the developing South, especially in Africa. This study aims to assess the subjective interlinkages between subjective social status, inequality perceptions and demand for redistribution in South Africa, the country with the highest level of inequality in the world. Using ISSP data and an ordered probit model, we show that subjective social status is a negative and significant determinant of demand for redistribution in South Africa. This means that South Africans who position themselves on the lower rungs of society demand higher redistribution and vice versa. Furthermore, perceptions of inequality are significant in driving demand for redistribution in South Africa, as this study finds that inequality tolerance negatively influences demand for redistribution and perceptions of actual inequality positively influence demand for redistribution. This means that South Africans who perceive higher levels of inequality tend to demand more redistribution, while South Africans who tolerate more inequality tend to demand less redistribution. Surprisingly, inequality tolerance is relatively high among the unemployed, Africans, and females. Many of these individuals are part of the most vulnerable in society and would actually benefit from more redistribution. Overall, the results show that, in South Africa, subjective factors like subjective social status and attitudes towards inequality significantly influence demand for redistribution.","PeriodicalId":55873,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics","volume":"46 1","pages":"125 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03796205.2022.2126998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The international literature shows that demand for redistribution is influenced by subjective factors like perceptions of inequality and individuals’ perceived social status. However, few have assessed these subjective dynamics in the developing South, especially in Africa. This study aims to assess the subjective interlinkages between subjective social status, inequality perceptions and demand for redistribution in South Africa, the country with the highest level of inequality in the world. Using ISSP data and an ordered probit model, we show that subjective social status is a negative and significant determinant of demand for redistribution in South Africa. This means that South Africans who position themselves on the lower rungs of society demand higher redistribution and vice versa. Furthermore, perceptions of inequality are significant in driving demand for redistribution in South Africa, as this study finds that inequality tolerance negatively influences demand for redistribution and perceptions of actual inequality positively influence demand for redistribution. This means that South Africans who perceive higher levels of inequality tend to demand more redistribution, while South Africans who tolerate more inequality tend to demand less redistribution. Surprisingly, inequality tolerance is relatively high among the unemployed, Africans, and females. Many of these individuals are part of the most vulnerable in society and would actually benefit from more redistribution. Overall, the results show that, in South Africa, subjective factors like subjective social status and attitudes towards inequality significantly influence demand for redistribution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主观社会地位、不平等观念和不平等容忍度对再分配需求的影响。高度不平等社会的情况
摘要国际文献表明,再分配需求受到主观因素的影响,如对不平等的感知和个人对社会地位的感知。然而,很少有人评估发展中的南方,特别是非洲的这些主观动态。这项研究旨在评估南非这个世界上不平等程度最高的国家的主观社会地位、不平等观念和再分配需求之间的主观联系。使用ISSP数据和有序probit模型,我们表明主观社会地位是南非再分配需求的一个消极而重要的决定因素。这意味着,将自己定位在社会底层的南非人要求更高的再分配,反之亦然。此外,对不平等的看法在推动南非再分配需求方面具有重要意义,因为本研究发现,不平等容忍度对再分配需求产生负面影响,而对实际不平等的认识对再分配需求具有积极影响。这意味着,认为不平等程度更高的南非人往往要求更多的再分配,而容忍更多不平等的南非人则往往要求更少的再分配。令人惊讶的是,失业者、非洲人和女性对不平等的容忍度相对较高。这些人中的许多人是社会中最弱势群体的一部分,实际上会从更多的再分配中受益。总体而言,研究结果表明,在南非,主观社会地位和对不平等的态度等主观因素显著影响再分配需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics
Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Published by the Bureau for Economic Research and the Graduate School of Business, University of Stellenbosch. Articles in the field of study of Economics (in the widest sense of the word).
期刊最新文献
Structural estimates of the South African sacrifice ratio Central Bank Independence and Inflation in India: The Role of Financial Development Threshold effects of regional fiscal stress index on employment Benchmarking an allocation to the foreign Sub-portfolio from a South African perspective Assessment of the impact of government response measures on the spread of COVID-19: panel data evidence for 50 countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1