Assessment of individual competence

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Scientia Medica Pub Date : 2021-12-20 DOI:10.15448/1980-6108.2021.1.41736
J. Leppink
{"title":"Assessment of individual competence","authors":"J. Leppink","doi":"10.15448/1980-6108.2021.1.41736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: the assessment of individual competence in medical education is about finding a balance between having sufficient resources to make valid and reliable decisions and not using more resources than necessary. Sequential assessment, in which more resources are used for borderline performing candidates than for poorly or clearly satisfactorily performing candidates, can be used to achieve that balance. Although sequential assessment is commonly associated with larger groups of candidates to be assessed, in many practical settings numbers of candidates may be small.Objective: this article presents a single case design with a statistical model for the assessment of individual competence that can be used regardless of the number of candidates.Method: a worked example of a solution that can be used for an individual candidate, using simulated data in the zero-cost Open Source statistical program R version 4.0.5., is provided.Results: the aforementioned solution provides statistics that can be used to make pass/fail decisions at the level of the individual candidate as well as to make decisions regarding the length and timing of an exam (or parts thereof) for the individual candidate.Conclusion: the solution provided can help to reduce resources needed for assessment to a considerable extent while maximizing resources for borderline candidates. This facilitates both decision making and cost reduction in assessment.","PeriodicalId":44024,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2021.1.41736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aims: the assessment of individual competence in medical education is about finding a balance between having sufficient resources to make valid and reliable decisions and not using more resources than necessary. Sequential assessment, in which more resources are used for borderline performing candidates than for poorly or clearly satisfactorily performing candidates, can be used to achieve that balance. Although sequential assessment is commonly associated with larger groups of candidates to be assessed, in many practical settings numbers of candidates may be small.Objective: this article presents a single case design with a statistical model for the assessment of individual competence that can be used regardless of the number of candidates.Method: a worked example of a solution that can be used for an individual candidate, using simulated data in the zero-cost Open Source statistical program R version 4.0.5., is provided.Results: the aforementioned solution provides statistics that can be used to make pass/fail decisions at the level of the individual candidate as well as to make decisions regarding the length and timing of an exam (or parts thereof) for the individual candidate.Conclusion: the solution provided can help to reduce resources needed for assessment to a considerable extent while maximizing resources for borderline candidates. This facilitates both decision making and cost reduction in assessment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人能力评估
目的:对医学教育中个人能力的评估是在有足够的资源作出有效和可靠的决定和不使用不必要的资源之间找到平衡。顺序评估可以用来实现这种平衡,其中更多的资源用于表现不佳的候选人,而不是表现不佳或表现明显令人满意的候选人。虽然顺序评估通常与较大的待评估候选人群体有关,但在许多实际设置中,候选人的数量可能很小。目的:本文提出了一个单一的案例设计与统计模型,可用于评估个人能力,无论候选人的数量。方法:使用零成本开源统计程序R版本4.0.5中的模拟数据,为个人候选人提供解决方案的工作示例。,提供。结果:上述解决方案提供的统计数据可用于在个人考生的水平上做出通过/不通过的决定,以及决定个人考生考试(或部分考试)的时长和时间。结论:提供的解决方案可以在很大程度上帮助减少评估所需的资源,同时最大限度地为边缘候选人提供资源。这既有利于决策,又有利于降低评估成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scientia Medica
Scientia Medica MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Participação, recomendação, produção e socialização dos participantes de ligas acadêmicas na graduação em medicina Fatores associados à saúde mental de alunos do internato interprofissional de enfrentamento à COVID-19 Grandes deleções raras no CFTR O escorpionismo no Estado de Goiás (2003-2019) Determinantes sociais da qualidade de vida entre estudantes de graduação e sua associação com o risco de suicídio
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1