Comments on Confidence as Likelihood by Pawitan and Lee in Statistical Science, November 2021

IF 3.4 1区 数学 Q1 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Statistical Science Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1214/22-sts862
M. Lavine, J. F. Bjørnstad
{"title":"Comments on Confidence as Likelihood by Pawitan and Lee in Statistical Science, November 2021","authors":"M. Lavine, J. F. Bjørnstad","doi":"10.1214/22-sts862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Pawitan and Lee (2021) attempt to show a correspondence between confidence and likelihood, specifically, that “confidence is in fact an extended likelihood” (Pawitan and Lee, 2021, abstract). The word “extended” means that the likelihood function can accommodate unobserved random variables such as random effects and future values; see Bjørnstad (1996) for details. Here we argue that the extended likelihood presented by Pawitan and Lee (2021) is not the correct extended likelihood and does not justify interpreting confidence as likelihood.","PeriodicalId":51172,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Science","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1214/22-sts862","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. Pawitan and Lee (2021) attempt to show a correspondence between confidence and likelihood, specifically, that “confidence is in fact an extended likelihood” (Pawitan and Lee, 2021, abstract). The word “extended” means that the likelihood function can accommodate unobserved random variables such as random effects and future values; see Bjørnstad (1996) for details. Here we argue that the extended likelihood presented by Pawitan and Lee (2021) is not the correct extended likelihood and does not justify interpreting confidence as likelihood.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pawitan和Lee在《统计科学》杂志上对置信度作为可能性的评论,2021年11月
Pawitan和Lee(2021)试图展示信心和可能性之间的对应关系,特别是“信心实际上是一种扩展的可能性”(Pawitan and Lee,2021,摘要)。“扩展”一词意味着似然函数可以容纳未观察到的随机变量,如随机效应和未来值;详见Bjørnstad(1996)。在这里,我们认为Pawitan和Lee(2021)提出的扩展可能性不是正确的扩展可能性,也不能证明将置信度解释为可能性是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Science
Statistical Science 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
1.80%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The central purpose of Statistical Science is to convey the richness, breadth and unity of the field by presenting the full range of contemporary statistical thought at a moderate technical level, accessible to the wide community of practitioners, researchers and students of statistics and probability.
期刊最新文献
On the Use of Auxiliary Variables in Multilevel Regression and Poststratification. Scalable Empirical Bayes Inference and Bayesian Sensitivity Analysis. Variable Selection Using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees. Causal Inference Methods for Combining Randomized Trials and Observational Studies: A Review. Defining Replicability of Prediction Rules
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1