A spectrum of non-spore-forming fermentative and non-fermentative Gram-negative bacteria: multi-drug resistance, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, and carbapenemase production

Y. Desalegn, A. Bitew, Amanuel Adane
{"title":"A spectrum of non-spore-forming fermentative and non-fermentative Gram-negative bacteria: multi-drug resistance, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, and carbapenemase production","authors":"Y. Desalegn, A. Bitew, Amanuel Adane","doi":"10.3389/frabi.2023.1155005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background In developing countries, the co-existence of a high burden of infectious diseases caused by Gram-negative bacteria and the rapid increase and spread of multidrug-resistant bacteria have become a serious health threat. Objective Profiling of Gram-negative bacteria and determining the magnitude of their antimicrobial resistance among patients. Results A total of 175 non-spore-forming Gram-negative bacteria were isolated from 873 different clinical samples. Of a total of 175 bacteria, 154 (88%) were fermentative Gram-negative bacteria, while 21 (12%) were non-fermentative Gram-negative bacteria. E. coli with a frequency of 58.3% and K. pneumoniae with a frequency of 18.3% were the predominant fermentative Gram-negative bacteria, while P. aeruginosa 9 (5.1%) and A. baumannii 6 (3.4%) were the predominant non-fermentative Gram-negative bacteria. The highest percentage level of antibiotic resistance was seen against ampicillin (86%), and the lowest against meropenem (9.8). About 49 (28%) Gram-negative bacilli were positive for ESBLase. The overall prevalence rate of MDR bacteria was 80.5%, of which 100% of A. baumannii, 90.6% of K. pneumonia. Sixteen isolates were resistant to meropenem, out of which 11 tested for carbapenemase production. Five of the nine were metallo-lactamase producers, with the remaining four being serine carbapenemase producers. Conclusion The prevalence of Gram-negative bacterial infection was found to be 20%, with a significant proportion (80.0%) due to fermentative Gram-negative bacteria and the remaining 20% due to non-fermentative Gram-negative bacteria. The study has also demonstrated a high prevalence rate of MDR, ESBLase, and carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrobial resistance of Gram-negative bacteria should be monitored on a regular basis, and an effective infection control program should be implemented.","PeriodicalId":73065,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in antibiotics","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frabi.2023.1155005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background In developing countries, the co-existence of a high burden of infectious diseases caused by Gram-negative bacteria and the rapid increase and spread of multidrug-resistant bacteria have become a serious health threat. Objective Profiling of Gram-negative bacteria and determining the magnitude of their antimicrobial resistance among patients. Results A total of 175 non-spore-forming Gram-negative bacteria were isolated from 873 different clinical samples. Of a total of 175 bacteria, 154 (88%) were fermentative Gram-negative bacteria, while 21 (12%) were non-fermentative Gram-negative bacteria. E. coli with a frequency of 58.3% and K. pneumoniae with a frequency of 18.3% were the predominant fermentative Gram-negative bacteria, while P. aeruginosa 9 (5.1%) and A. baumannii 6 (3.4%) were the predominant non-fermentative Gram-negative bacteria. The highest percentage level of antibiotic resistance was seen against ampicillin (86%), and the lowest against meropenem (9.8). About 49 (28%) Gram-negative bacilli were positive for ESBLase. The overall prevalence rate of MDR bacteria was 80.5%, of which 100% of A. baumannii, 90.6% of K. pneumonia. Sixteen isolates were resistant to meropenem, out of which 11 tested for carbapenemase production. Five of the nine were metallo-lactamase producers, with the remaining four being serine carbapenemase producers. Conclusion The prevalence of Gram-negative bacterial infection was found to be 20%, with a significant proportion (80.0%) due to fermentative Gram-negative bacteria and the remaining 20% due to non-fermentative Gram-negative bacteria. The study has also demonstrated a high prevalence rate of MDR, ESBLase, and carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrobial resistance of Gram-negative bacteria should be monitored on a regular basis, and an effective infection control program should be implemented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非孢子形成发酵和非发酵革兰氏阴性菌的光谱:多重耐药,广谱β -内酰胺酶和碳青霉烯酶生产
在发展中国家,革兰氏阴性菌引起的高负担传染病与多重耐药菌的迅速增加和传播并存,已成为严重的健康威胁。目的分析革兰氏阴性菌及其对抗生素的耐药程度。结果从873份临床标本中分离出非孢子形成革兰氏阴性菌175株。175株细菌中,发酵革兰氏阴性菌154株(88%),非发酵革兰氏阴性菌21株(12%)。发酵革兰氏阴性菌以大肠杆菌(频率为58.3%)和肺炎克雷伯菌(频率为18.3%)为主,非发酵革兰氏阴性菌以铜绿假单胞菌9(频率为5.1%)和鲍曼假单胞菌6(频率为3.4%)为主。抗生素耐药比例最高的是氨苄西林(86%),最低的是美罗培南(9.8)。革兰氏阴性杆菌ESBLase阳性49株(28%)。耐多药细菌总患病率为80.5%,其中鲍曼不动杆菌100%,肺炎克雷伯菌90.6%。16株菌株对美罗培南耐药,其中11株产碳青霉烯酶。其中5个是金属内酰胺酶生产者,其余4个是丝氨酸碳青霉烯酶生产者。结论革兰氏阴性菌感染率为20%,其中发酵性革兰氏阴性菌占80.0%,非发酵性革兰氏阴性菌占20%。该研究还证明了耐多药、ESBLase和产碳青霉烯酶的革兰氏阴性菌的高患病率。应定期监测革兰氏阴性菌的耐药性,并实施有效的感染控制方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical isolates from adult and paediatric patients in Jordan: Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) 2010–2021 Editorial: Antibiotics in engineered and natural environments: occurrence, fate, kinetic and microbial impact Increased usage of doxycycline for young children with Lyme disease Unguarded liabilities: Borrelia burgdorferi’s complex amino acid dependence exposes unique avenues of inhibition Antibiogram profiles of pathogenic and commensal bacteria in goat and sheep feces on smallholder farm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1