Long Term Progress in Riparian Restoration with Concurrent Avian Declines in the Southern San Francisco Bay Area (CA)

IF 2.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecological Restoration Pub Date : 2022-08-29 DOI:10.3368/er.40.3.203
I. Stewart, Liam Healey, Katie LaBarbera, Hongyu Li, Josh C. Scullen, Yiwei Wang, D. Wenny
{"title":"Long Term Progress in Riparian Restoration with Concurrent Avian Declines in the Southern San Francisco Bay Area (CA)","authors":"I. Stewart, Liam Healey, Katie LaBarbera, Hongyu Li, Josh C. Scullen, Yiwei Wang, D. Wenny","doi":"10.3368/er.40.3.203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The restoration of riparian habitats aims to provide habitat for birds and other environmental benefits; yet the evaluation of long-term outcomes is rare. To address this knowledge gap, we used bird and vegetation data from Coyote Creek Field Station (CCFS), in the southern San Francisco Bay Area, to assess the progress of two riparian revegetation projects (1987 Revegetation, 1993 Revegetation) over nearly two decades. Restoration success was measured by changes in 1) vegetation structure and composition, and 2) avian abundance, diversity, and community composition. We compared the two revegetated areas to a remnant riparian reference site and a managed floodplain overflow channel in three time periods (1996–1998, 2004–2006, 2012–2014) using ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD tests, and beta diversity analysis of avian community composition. Over time, the restored areas became more similar to the remnant riparian reference site in four of seven indices. The avian community became more similar across the habitat areas over time, although differences remained. Migratory birds declined across all habitat areas, while resident and wintering birds declined in one revegetated habitat only. Overall we found that different types of data told different stories, indicating both convergence with the reference site and ongoing differences. Our findings highlight the need for multifaceted approaches to evaluating restoration success.","PeriodicalId":11492,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Restoration","volume":"40 1","pages":"203 - 217"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/er.40.3.203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The restoration of riparian habitats aims to provide habitat for birds and other environmental benefits; yet the evaluation of long-term outcomes is rare. To address this knowledge gap, we used bird and vegetation data from Coyote Creek Field Station (CCFS), in the southern San Francisco Bay Area, to assess the progress of two riparian revegetation projects (1987 Revegetation, 1993 Revegetation) over nearly two decades. Restoration success was measured by changes in 1) vegetation structure and composition, and 2) avian abundance, diversity, and community composition. We compared the two revegetated areas to a remnant riparian reference site and a managed floodplain overflow channel in three time periods (1996–1998, 2004–2006, 2012–2014) using ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD tests, and beta diversity analysis of avian community composition. Over time, the restored areas became more similar to the remnant riparian reference site in four of seven indices. The avian community became more similar across the habitat areas over time, although differences remained. Migratory birds declined across all habitat areas, while resident and wintering birds declined in one revegetated habitat only. Overall we found that different types of data told different stories, indicating both convergence with the reference site and ongoing differences. Our findings highlight the need for multifaceted approaches to evaluating restoration success.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旧金山湾区南部河岸恢复与同时发生的鸟类减少的长期进展(CA)
河岸栖息地的恢复旨在为鸟类提供栖息地和其他环境效益;然而,对长期结果的评估却很少。为了解决这一知识差距,我们使用了旧金山湾区南部Coyote Creek野外站(CCFS)的鸟类和植被数据,评估了近20年来两个河岸重新植被项目(1987年重新植被和1993年重新植被)的进展情况。恢复成功的衡量标准是1)植被结构和组成的变化,以及2)鸟类丰度、多样性和群落组成的变化。我们使用ANOVA、Tukey的HSD测试和鸟类群落组成的β多样性分析,在三个时间段(1996-1998、2004-2006、2012-2014)内,将两个重新植被区与一个残余河岸参考点和一个管理的泛滥平原溢流通道进行了比较。随着时间的推移,在七个指数中的四个指数中,恢复后的区域变得更类似于残留的河岸参考点。随着时间的推移,不同栖息地的鸟类群落变得更加相似,尽管差异仍然存在。候鸟在所有栖息地都有所减少,而留鸟和越冬鸟只在一个重新植被的栖息地减少。总的来说,我们发现不同类型的数据讲述了不同的故事,这表明与参考网站的一致性和持续的差异。我们的研究结果强调了评估修复成功率的多方面方法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Restoration
Ecological Restoration Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Ecological Restoration is a forum for people advancing the science and practice of restoration ecology. It features the technical and biological aspects of restoring landscapes, as well as collaborations between restorationists and the design professions, land-use policy, the role of education, and more. This quarterly publication includes peer-reviewed science articles, perspectives and notes, book reviews, abstracts of restoration ecology progress published elsewhere, and announcements of scientific and professional meetings.
期刊最新文献
Using Hot Foam to Control an Invasive Annual, Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass), before Seeding Can Forest Restoration Affect the Genetic Diversity of Plants? Evidence for an Arboretum as a Point Source of Exotic Invasive Plants in Cincinnati, Ohio Mid-contract Management Alters Conservation Reserve Program Vegetation in the Central and Western United States Demography, Time to First Flowering and Longevity of 14 Temperate Forest Herbaceous Species, Iowa, USA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1