The Animal Gaze in Julio Cortázar´s “Axolotl”

IF 0.1 Theory in Action Pub Date : 2022-10-31 DOI:10.3798/tia.1937-0237.2230
Fernando Valerio-Holguín
{"title":"The Animal Gaze in Julio Cortázar´s “Axolotl”","authors":"Fernando Valerio-Holguín","doi":"10.3798/tia.1937-0237.2230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his essay “Why Look at Animals?,” John Berger states that in the first encounter between a human and an animal, the latter's eyes are attentive and wary. The animal looks at the human from the abyss of incomprehension. The human becomes aware of himself by looking back at the animal, who is the radical Other. If the abyss of otherness between humans can be bridged through language, this is impossible between the human and the animal. The gaze is the only possibility for the human to “descend” to the animal. Julio Cortázar wrote “Axolotl,” which tells the story of a man who, fascinated by the axolotls, goes to the Jardin des Plantes aquarium in Paris every day to observe them and ends up becoming one of them. Already in the first paragraph of the story, the character-narrator states: “Now I am an axolotl.” Then he adds: “His eyes above all obsessed me. Next to them in the other aquariums, various fish showed me the simple stupidity of their beautiful eyes like ours. The eyes of the axolotls told me of the presence of a different life, of another way of looking.” The narrator manages to transcend the barrier of “space and time” through the gaze and, finally, becomes an axolotl. KEYWORDS: Cortázar, Animal Gaze, Axolotl, Metamorphosis, Transmigration, Radical Other.","PeriodicalId":42347,"journal":{"name":"Theory in Action","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory in Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3798/tia.1937-0237.2230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In his essay “Why Look at Animals?,” John Berger states that in the first encounter between a human and an animal, the latter's eyes are attentive and wary. The animal looks at the human from the abyss of incomprehension. The human becomes aware of himself by looking back at the animal, who is the radical Other. If the abyss of otherness between humans can be bridged through language, this is impossible between the human and the animal. The gaze is the only possibility for the human to “descend” to the animal. Julio Cortázar wrote “Axolotl,” which tells the story of a man who, fascinated by the axolotls, goes to the Jardin des Plantes aquarium in Paris every day to observe them and ends up becoming one of them. Already in the first paragraph of the story, the character-narrator states: “Now I am an axolotl.” Then he adds: “His eyes above all obsessed me. Next to them in the other aquariums, various fish showed me the simple stupidity of their beautiful eyes like ours. The eyes of the axolotls told me of the presence of a different life, of another way of looking.” The narrator manages to transcend the barrier of “space and time” through the gaze and, finally, becomes an axolotl. KEYWORDS: Cortázar, Animal Gaze, Axolotl, Metamorphosis, Transmigration, Radical Other.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胡里奥·科塔扎尔的《蝾螈》中的动物凝视
约翰·伯杰在他的文章《为什么看动物?》中指出,在人类和动物的第一次相遇中,后者的眼睛是专注和警惕的。动物从无法理解的深渊中看着人类。人类通过回头看动物而意识到自己,动物是激进的他者。如果人类之间的另类深渊可以通过语言弥合,那么这在人类和动物之间是不可能的。凝视是人类“下降”到动物身上的唯一可能性。胡利奥·科尔塔扎(Julio Cortázar)写了《蝾螈》(Axolotl),这本书告诉了一个男人的故事,他对蝾螈着迷,每天都去巴黎的植物园水族馆观察它们,最后成为了它们中的一员。在故事的第一段中,角色叙述者就说:“现在我是一只蝾螈了。”然后他补充道:“他的眼睛首先让我着迷。在其他水族馆里,各种各样的鱼向我展示了它们美丽的眼睛的愚蠢,就像我们的眼睛一样。蝾螈的眼睛告诉我存在着不同的生命,还有另一种看待方式。”。叙述者通过凝视成功地跨越了“空间和时间”的障碍,最终成为了一只蝾螈。关键词:Cortázar,动物凝视,Axolotl,变形,迁移,激进其他。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Theory in Action
Theory in Action SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Book Review: James Söderholm, Prince Hamlet. Lioness Writing Ltd. 2021. The Impact COVID had on Carceral Institutions in the United States Book Review: Steve Herbert, Too Easy to Keep: Life-Sentenced Prisoners and the Future of Mass Incarceration. First Edition. Oakland, CA: University of California Press. 2019. ISBN: 978- 0520300514 A Comparison of the Patient Wife in Boccaccio, Petrarch, Chaucer, and Lope Producing the Present through the Past: Adam Smith and the Inevitability of the Economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1