Greek heritage language teachers as emergency grassroots policy makers: reconciling learner centred responses with textbook heavy pedagogies during COVID-19 lockdown
{"title":"Greek heritage language teachers as emergency grassroots policy makers: reconciling learner centred responses with textbook heavy pedagogies during COVID-19 lockdown","authors":"V. Lytra","doi":"10.1080/14664208.2023.2227545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the paucity of research on policy agents ’ responses to the shift to teaching online during the fi rst lockdown in heritage language education and pedagogy. Collected in the context of a small-scale exploratory study, it focuses on the re fl ective accounts of a group of heritage language teachers in a Greek school in francophone Switzerland. The paper builds on a translingual and transcultural orientation to language and language education (Lytra et al., 2022, Liberating Language Education. Multilingual Matters) and investigates language teachers ’ emergency grassroots policy making through a critical ethnographic lens (Martin-Jones & da Costa Cabral, 2018, The critical ethnographic turn in research on language policy and planning. In J. W. Tollefson, & M. Pérez-Milans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Policy and Planning (pp. 71 – 92). Oxford University Press). It demonstrates how teachers leveraged children ’ s developing digital abilities and expanded their semiotic repertoires. Concerned with delivering the curriculum, meeting language and literacy objectives and managing parental expectations, teachers simultaneously exploited children ’ s familiarity with established textbook heavy pedagogies which they adapted to di ff erent degrees. The acknowledgement and incorporation of children ’ s digital abilities, and experiences to support Greek language learning did not encompass an integrative multimodal and multilingual approach.","PeriodicalId":51704,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Language Planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Language Planning","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2023.2227545","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper addresses the paucity of research on policy agents ’ responses to the shift to teaching online during the fi rst lockdown in heritage language education and pedagogy. Collected in the context of a small-scale exploratory study, it focuses on the re fl ective accounts of a group of heritage language teachers in a Greek school in francophone Switzerland. The paper builds on a translingual and transcultural orientation to language and language education (Lytra et al., 2022, Liberating Language Education. Multilingual Matters) and investigates language teachers ’ emergency grassroots policy making through a critical ethnographic lens (Martin-Jones & da Costa Cabral, 2018, The critical ethnographic turn in research on language policy and planning. In J. W. Tollefson, & M. Pérez-Milans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Policy and Planning (pp. 71 – 92). Oxford University Press). It demonstrates how teachers leveraged children ’ s developing digital abilities and expanded their semiotic repertoires. Concerned with delivering the curriculum, meeting language and literacy objectives and managing parental expectations, teachers simultaneously exploited children ’ s familiarity with established textbook heavy pedagogies which they adapted to di ff erent degrees. The acknowledgement and incorporation of children ’ s digital abilities, and experiences to support Greek language learning did not encompass an integrative multimodal and multilingual approach.
本文解决了在遗产语言教育和教学法的第一次封锁期间,政策代理人对在线教学转变的反应研究的缺乏。收集在一个小规模的探索性研究的背景下,它侧重于一群传统语言教师在法语区瑞士的希腊学校的反思。本文以语言和语言教育的跨语言和跨文化取向为基础(Lytra et al., 2022,《解放语言教育》)。(Martin-Jones & da Costa Cabral, 2018,《语言政策和规划研究中的关键民族志转向》),并通过批判性民族志镜头调查语言教师的紧急基层政策制定。J. W. Tollefson, & M. prez - milans(编辑),牛津语言政策和规划手册(第71 - 92页)。牛津大学出版社)。它展示了教师如何利用儿童发展的数字能力和扩大他们的符号库。教师关心课程的传授,满足语言和读写目标以及管理家长的期望,同时利用儿童对既定教科书式教学法的熟悉程度,并在不同程度上适应这种教学法。承认和结合儿童的数字能力和经验来支持希腊语学习并没有包含一个综合的多模式和多语言的方法。
期刊介绍:
The journal Current Issues in Language Planning provides major summative and thematic review studies spanning and focusing the disparate language policy and language planning literature related to: 1) polities and language planning and 2) issues in language planning. The journal publishes four issues per year, two on each subject area. The polity issues describe language policy and planning in various countries/regions/areas around the world, while the issues numbers are thematically based. The Current Issues in Language Planning does not normally accept individual studies falling outside this polity and thematic approach. Polity studies and thematic issues" papers in this journal may be self-nominated or invited contributions from acknowledged experts in the field.