De implementatie van 'Samen beslissen' in het ziekenhuis en de werkdruk van zorgprofessionals

IF 0.3 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Gedrag & Organisatie Pub Date : 2019-11-12 DOI:10.5117/2019.032.004.004
R. Schouteten, L. Jansen
{"title":"De implementatie van 'Samen beslissen' in het ziekenhuis en de werkdruk van zorgprofessionals","authors":"R. Schouteten, L. Jansen","doi":"10.5117/2019.032.004.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shared decision making and workload among Dutch health care professionals\n\nR. Schouteten & L. Jansen, Gedrag & Organisatie, volume 32, November 2019, nr. 4, pp. 279-298.\n\nThis study investigates the effect of shared decision making on the work and workload of health care professionals in hospitals. In shared decision making, patients are actively involved in the decision making process. Empirical research shows that shared decision making has positive effects on patient related outcomes, however there are no studies into the effects of this way of decision making for the health care professionals involved.\n\nBuilding on the Job Demands-Resources model, we studied the mechanisms that can explain the effects of shared decision making on health care professionals when applied in the care processes for patients with prostate cancer. The study collected qualitative data on the care processes from ten patients and the two health care professionals involved.\n\nNext to a confirmation of the positive effects for patients, the results show that the health care professionals positively evaluate shared decision making. Regarding workload, the health care professionals report a healthy balance between job demands and resources. The mechanisms to explain these positive results include the carefulness of the design and implementation of such a new way of working. This means that a well-thought out implementation of a new way of working support keeping workload within healthy limits, even in a high-workload sector.","PeriodicalId":43933,"journal":{"name":"Gedrag & Organisatie","volume":"32 1","pages":"279-298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gedrag & Organisatie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/2019.032.004.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shared decision making and workload among Dutch health care professionals R. Schouteten & L. Jansen, Gedrag & Organisatie, volume 32, November 2019, nr. 4, pp. 279-298. This study investigates the effect of shared decision making on the work and workload of health care professionals in hospitals. In shared decision making, patients are actively involved in the decision making process. Empirical research shows that shared decision making has positive effects on patient related outcomes, however there are no studies into the effects of this way of decision making for the health care professionals involved. Building on the Job Demands-Resources model, we studied the mechanisms that can explain the effects of shared decision making on health care professionals when applied in the care processes for patients with prostate cancer. The study collected qualitative data on the care processes from ten patients and the two health care professionals involved. Next to a confirmation of the positive effects for patients, the results show that the health care professionals positively evaluate shared decision making. Regarding workload, the health care professionals report a healthy balance between job demands and resources. The mechanisms to explain these positive results include the carefulness of the design and implementation of such a new way of working. This means that a well-thought out implementation of a new way of working support keeping workload within healthy limits, even in a high-workload sector.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在医院实施“共同决策”和医护人员的工作量
荷兰卫生保健专业人员共同决策和分担工作量。Schouteten & L. Jansen, Gedrag & Organisatie,第32卷,2019年11月,第4期,第279-298页。本研究旨在探讨共同决策对医院医护人员工作及工作量的影响。在共同决策中,患者积极参与决策过程。实证研究表明,共同决策对患者相关结果有积极影响,但没有研究表明这种决策方式对所涉及的卫生保健专业人员的影响。在工作需求-资源模型的基础上,我们研究了共同决策在前列腺癌患者护理过程中对医护人员的影响机制。该研究收集了10名患者和两名相关卫生保健专业人员的护理过程定性数据。除了确认对患者的积极影响外,结果显示卫生保健专业人员积极评价共同决策。关于工作量,卫生保健专业人员报告工作需求和资源之间的健康平衡。解释这些积极结果的机制包括仔细设计和实施这种新的工作方式。这意味着,即使在高工作量部门,经过深思熟虑的新工作方式的实施也有助于将工作量保持在健康的范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Empowerende HRM-praktijken en de rol van leiderschap in Het Nieuwe Werken: Lessen voor het hybride werken Call for papers voor G&O-themanummer 2024: Reflectie en praktische perspectieven op burn-out Baanbrekend: Gecompliceerde rouwreacties na onvrijwillig baanverlies Employability in de context van een innovatieve en lerende regio Reviewers 2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1