Negative Effect of Roundup Requests on Repurchase Intentions

IF 3.8 Q2 BUSINESS Australasian Marketing Journal Pub Date : 2021-03-23 DOI:10.1177/18393349211002534
S. Khan, F. Septianto, P. Putra
{"title":"Negative Effect of Roundup Requests on Repurchase Intentions","authors":"S. Khan, F. Septianto, P. Putra","doi":"10.1177/18393349211002534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Requesting customers to “round up” the total for their purchases to the next whole dollar and donating the difference has been a recent trend among some companies. A recent study argues that a roundup donation request reduces the perceived pain of donating, thus making it more effective as compared with a flat donation request; however, the present research argues that a roundup donation request can also have potential negative returns. This article demonstrates across two experimental studies, that consumers report lower repurchase intentions when approached with a roundup (vs. flat) donation request, due to an increased anticipated negative affect associated with refusing such a request. Moreover, such effects only occur among consumers with utilitarian (but not hedonic) purchase motives. The findings of this research extend prior research in this area by highlighting the potential negative consequences of roundup donation requests.","PeriodicalId":47402,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Marketing Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"288 - 296"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/18393349211002534","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Marketing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18393349211002534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Requesting customers to “round up” the total for their purchases to the next whole dollar and donating the difference has been a recent trend among some companies. A recent study argues that a roundup donation request reduces the perceived pain of donating, thus making it more effective as compared with a flat donation request; however, the present research argues that a roundup donation request can also have potential negative returns. This article demonstrates across two experimental studies, that consumers report lower repurchase intentions when approached with a roundup (vs. flat) donation request, due to an increased anticipated negative affect associated with refusing such a request. Moreover, such effects only occur among consumers with utilitarian (but not hedonic) purchase motives. The findings of this research extend prior research in this area by highlighting the potential negative consequences of roundup donation requests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综述请求对回购意向的负面影响
要求顾客将购物总额“四舍五入”到下一个整美元,并将差额捐出,已成为一些公司最近的一种趋势。最近的一项研究认为,综合捐赠请求减少了捐赠的感知痛苦,因此与单一的捐赠请求相比,它更有效;然而,目前的研究认为,综合捐赠请求也可能有潜在的负回报。这篇文章通过两项实验研究证明,消费者在面对围捕(与扁平)捐赠请求时报告的回购意愿较低,因为拒绝此类请求会增加预期的负面影响。此外,这种影响只发生在具有功利(而非享乐)购买动机的消费者中。本研究的发现通过强调农达捐赠请求的潜在负面后果,扩展了该领域先前的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) is the official journal of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy (ANZMAC). It is an academic journal for the dissemination of leading studies in marketing, for researchers, students, educators, scholars, and practitioners. The objective of the AMJ is to publish articles that enrich and contribute to the advancement of the discipline and the practice of marketing. Therefore, manuscripts accepted for publication will be theoretically sound, offer significant research findings and insights, and suggest meaningful implications and recommendations. Articles reporting original empirical research should include defensible methodology and findings consistent with rigorous academic standards.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Equity in Australian Higher Education Using Fuzzy Trace Theory Simplifying Sentiment Analysis on Social Media: A Step-by-Step Approach Engaging Robo-advisors in Financial Advisory Services: The Role of Psychological Comfort and Client Psychological Characteristics Why do Consumers Forgive Online Travel Agencies? A Multi-study Approach In-Store Communications: Understanding the Mundane, the Bright Sides, and the Unexpected
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1