CONCEPTUAL DIMENSIONS OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT AND ELECTRONIC GOVERNANCE IN THE DOMAIN OF DIGITAL DEMOCRACY

Vephkhvia Grigalashvili
{"title":"CONCEPTUAL DIMENSIONS OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT AND ELECTRONIC GOVERNANCE IN THE DOMAIN OF DIGITAL DEMOCRACY","authors":"Vephkhvia Grigalashvili","doi":"10.31435/rsglobal_ijite/30032022/7753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Further development of the domain of electronic (digital) democracy, which represents the result of implementation of electronic government and electronic governance, and implies the smart use of digital tools, substantially depends on how correctly is defined their conceptual dimensions and determined their functional purposes. E-government and E-governance (as terms and concepts), known as multidimensional, multifaceted and multidisciplinary phenomenon, are often treated as synonymous and used interchangeably in the academic literature or formal documents. Therefore it is becoming increasingly difficult to set a common definition (Roy, 2003) or clear existing conceptual ambiguity between them. There is no universally accepted definition of both abstractions. Such conceptual uncertainty has a negative impact on the development of digital democracy. The research objective of this article is to provide a deeper understanding of e-government and e-governance concepts through empirical studies and scatter the existing ambiguity in differences between these two concepts as this variety is not just questions of academic nuance. Based on a comparative analysis of e-government and e-governance definitions and conceptual meanings, this article offers an approach according to which e-government and e-governance represents two various but closely related and co-existing concepts. Furthermore, in the concluding section of the article, there are suggested recommendations regarding development a new grand term or concept in which both multidimensional conceptual visions will be combined.","PeriodicalId":34262,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijite/30032022/7753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Further development of the domain of electronic (digital) democracy, which represents the result of implementation of electronic government and electronic governance, and implies the smart use of digital tools, substantially depends on how correctly is defined their conceptual dimensions and determined their functional purposes. E-government and E-governance (as terms and concepts), known as multidimensional, multifaceted and multidisciplinary phenomenon, are often treated as synonymous and used interchangeably in the academic literature or formal documents. Therefore it is becoming increasingly difficult to set a common definition (Roy, 2003) or clear existing conceptual ambiguity between them. There is no universally accepted definition of both abstractions. Such conceptual uncertainty has a negative impact on the development of digital democracy. The research objective of this article is to provide a deeper understanding of e-government and e-governance concepts through empirical studies and scatter the existing ambiguity in differences between these two concepts as this variety is not just questions of academic nuance. Based on a comparative analysis of e-government and e-governance definitions and conceptual meanings, this article offers an approach according to which e-government and e-governance represents two various but closely related and co-existing concepts. Furthermore, in the concluding section of the article, there are suggested recommendations regarding development a new grand term or concept in which both multidimensional conceptual visions will be combined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字民主领域中电子政府和电子治理的概念维度
电子(数字)民主领域的进一步发展在很大程度上取决于如何正确定义其概念维度和确定其功能目的。电子民主代表了电子政府和电子治理的实施结果,并意味着数字工具的智能使用。电子政府和电子政务(作为术语和概念)被称为多维、多方面和多学科的现象,在学术文献或正式文件中经常被视为同义词并可互换使用。因此,设定一个共同的定义(Roy,2003)或清除它们之间现有的概念模糊性变得越来越困难。这两种抽象概念都没有被普遍接受的定义。这种概念上的不确定性对数字民主的发展产生了负面影响。本文的研究目的是通过实证研究,更深入地理解电子政务和电子政务概念,并消除这两个概念之间存在的歧义,因为这种多样性不仅仅是学术细微差别的问题。在比较分析电子政务和电子政务的定义和概念含义的基础上,本文提出了一种方法,即电子政务和网络政务代表了两个不同但密切相关和共存的概念。此外,在文章的结论部分,有人建议开发一个新的大术语或概念,在这个术语或概念中,两个多维的概念愿景将结合在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
FUNDAMENTAL ANALYSIS AND TECHNICAL ANALYSIS IN INVESTMENT DECISION MAKING THE IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON THE STOCK PRICES OF MANUFACTURING COMPANIES ON THE INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE FACTORS OF CHANGES IN DEMAND FOR THE USE OF FREIGHT WAGONS JSC “UKRZALIZNYTSYA” MEDIATION MODEL OF SELF-EFFICACY ON STUDENT ENTREPRENEURIAL INTEREST TOURISM CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES IN THE MOUNTAINOUS AJARA: ON THE BESHUMI RESORT EXAMPLE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1