The two kinds of artificial intelligence, or how not to confuse objects and subjects

IF 1 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Interdisciplinary Science Reviews Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/03080188.2022.2158258
A. Blackwell
{"title":"The two kinds of artificial intelligence, or how not to confuse objects and subjects","authors":"A. Blackwell","doi":"10.1080/03080188.2022.2158258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following essay is a stylistic experiment for Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, re fl ecting on a personal research agenda and trajectory, in relation to the disciplines that the author has engaged with. Interdisciplinary enquiry often arises from the idiosyncratic experiences and decisions of an individual serendipitously following curiosity, alongside the practical contingencies that shape anybody ’ s career. Such a re fl ection, if spanning multiple disciplines through the perspective of one person, cannot possibly be comprehensive, and will certainly expose the gaps in knowledge and loss of rigour that could have been corrected within a single discipline. The intention in presenting such a personal agenda is not to be de fi nitive, but rather to open up discussion by pulling on the loose threads at the edges of discipline. The primary goal of the experiment is to unsettle established disciplinary perspectives, even where the same questions could have been addressed more authorita-tively in another fi eld. 1","PeriodicalId":50352,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews","volume":"48 1","pages":"5 - 14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2158258","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The following essay is a stylistic experiment for Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, re fl ecting on a personal research agenda and trajectory, in relation to the disciplines that the author has engaged with. Interdisciplinary enquiry often arises from the idiosyncratic experiences and decisions of an individual serendipitously following curiosity, alongside the practical contingencies that shape anybody ’ s career. Such a re fl ection, if spanning multiple disciplines through the perspective of one person, cannot possibly be comprehensive, and will certainly expose the gaps in knowledge and loss of rigour that could have been corrected within a single discipline. The intention in presenting such a personal agenda is not to be de fi nitive, but rather to open up discussion by pulling on the loose threads at the edges of discipline. The primary goal of the experiment is to unsettle established disciplinary perspectives, even where the same questions could have been addressed more authorita-tively in another fi eld. 1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种人工智能,或者如何不混淆对象和主体
以下文章是《跨学科科学评论》的文体实验,反映了作者所从事学科的个人研究议程和轨迹。跨学科的探究往往源于一个人偶然遵循好奇心的特殊经历和决定,以及塑造任何人职业生涯的实际突发事件。如果从一个人的角度跨越多个学科,这种反思就不可能是全面的,而且肯定会暴露出本可以在一个学科内纠正的知识差距和严谨性的丧失。提出这样一个个人议程的目的不是要明确,而是通过抓住学科边缘的松散线索来展开讨论。该实验的主要目标是扰乱既定的学科观点,即使同样的问题本可以在另一个领域得到更权威的解决。1.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interdisciplinary Science Reviews is a quarterly journal that aims to explore the social, philosophical and historical interrelations of the natural sciences, engineering, mathematics, medicine and technology with the social sciences, humanities and arts.
期刊最新文献
Transcatheter aortic valve intervention in hospitals without cardiac surgery departments: a future scenario? Critical Doses: Nurturing Diversity in Psychedelic Studies ‘Everybody’s creating it along the way’: ethical tensions among globalized ayahuasca shamanisms and therapeutic integration practices Critical Doses: Nurturing Diversity in Psychedelic Studies Mysticizing medicine: incorporating nondualism into the training of psychedelic guides
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1