A Systematic Study of the Literature on Career Guidance Expert Systems for Students: Implications for ODL

Q3 Social Sciences Journal of Learning for Development Pub Date : 2022-11-21 DOI:10.56059/jl4d.v9i3.648
Shilpa Gunwant
{"title":"A Systematic Study of the Literature on Career Guidance Expert Systems for Students: Implications for ODL","authors":"Shilpa Gunwant","doi":"10.56059/jl4d.v9i3.648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The continual evolution of employment opportunities in the present industrial era has raised the need for career-long expert advice. Similar to other fields, thankfully technology has come to our rescue in the area of career guidance also. This paper presents a systematic review of Expert Systems (ES) developed for career guidance, course selection and evaluation of students in the past ten years. The popular research databases Google Scholar and Science Direct were used for obtaining the relevant research papers through broad keywords. The keywords were refined to identify the articles related to rule-based, case-based and fuzzy logic-based ES used for career guidance. A total of twenty-five peer-reviewed relevant articles with full-text available online was selected for the final study. In order to avoid duplicity, technical reports and unreferenced literature were excluded. The review identifies the relatively high weight given by the researchers to rule-based systems owing to their simplicity and broad applicability. However, the relative merits and demerits of rule-based, case-based and fuzzy logic-based ES are highly dependent on the field of application. Nevertheless, ES find wide applications in the area of career guidance and have the potential to enhance the career guidance accessibility of the most remote students.","PeriodicalId":36056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning for Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Learning for Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v9i3.648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The continual evolution of employment opportunities in the present industrial era has raised the need for career-long expert advice. Similar to other fields, thankfully technology has come to our rescue in the area of career guidance also. This paper presents a systematic review of Expert Systems (ES) developed for career guidance, course selection and evaluation of students in the past ten years. The popular research databases Google Scholar and Science Direct were used for obtaining the relevant research papers through broad keywords. The keywords were refined to identify the articles related to rule-based, case-based and fuzzy logic-based ES used for career guidance. A total of twenty-five peer-reviewed relevant articles with full-text available online was selected for the final study. In order to avoid duplicity, technical reports and unreferenced literature were excluded. The review identifies the relatively high weight given by the researchers to rule-based systems owing to their simplicity and broad applicability. However, the relative merits and demerits of rule-based, case-based and fuzzy logic-based ES are highly dependent on the field of application. Nevertheless, ES find wide applications in the area of career guidance and have the potential to enhance the career guidance accessibility of the most remote students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生职业指导专家系统文献的系统研究——对ODL的启示
在当前的工业时代,就业机会的不断演变,提高了对职业生涯专家建议的需求。与其他领域类似,值得庆幸的是,技术也在职业指导领域拯救了我们。本文对近十年来在学生就业指导、选课和评价方面发展起来的专家系统进行了系统的综述。使用热门研究数据库谷歌Scholar和Science Direct,通过广义关键词获取相关研究论文。对关键词进行细化,以识别用于职业指导的基于规则的、基于案例的和基于模糊逻辑的ES相关的文章。最终的研究选择了25篇同行评审的相关文章,并在网上提供全文。为避免重复,排除了技术报告和未参考文献。该综述指出,由于基于规则的系统的简单性和广泛适用性,研究人员给予了相对较高的权重。然而,基于规则的、基于案例的和基于模糊逻辑的系统的优缺点在很大程度上取决于应用领域。然而,ES在就业指导领域有广泛的应用,并有可能提高最偏远学生的就业指导可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Learning for Development
Journal of Learning for Development Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Preparedness and Competencies of Higher Education Teachers to Teach Online: A Study in North-East India Publication Trends of Online Assessment in Physical Education Teacher Professional Development @scale: Achieving Quality and Sustainability in Zambia Teacher Participation in Online Collaborative Learning: Does It Improve Their Teaching Competency? Preferences and Views of School Students on the Integration of MOOCs in Performance Tasks of EFL Courses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1