Clinical efficacy analysis of flow diverter in the treatment of large unruptured intracranial aneurysms

Qiaowei Wu, Li Li, Qiuji Shao, Tianxiao Li, Yingkun He, Hang Li
{"title":"Clinical efficacy analysis of flow diverter in the treatment of large unruptured intracranial aneurysms","authors":"Qiaowei Wu, Li Li, Qiuji Shao, Tianxiao Li, Yingkun He, Hang Li","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN112050-20190929-00422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of flow diverter (FD) in the treatment of large (maximum diameter≥10 mm) unruptured intracranial aneurysms. \n \n \nMethods \nA total of 92 patients harboring 95 large unruptured intracranial aneurysms who underwent treatment with FD (Pipeline + Tubridge) at Department of Cerebrovascular Intervention, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital from February 2015 to July 2019 were enrolled into this retrospective study. The modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used to evaluate the clinical outcomes at follow-up, and O′Kelly-Marotta (OKM) grading scale was used to evaluate the occlusion of aneurysm. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the influencing factors which could affect the aneurysm occlusion rate at 6-month follow-up. \n \n \nResults \nA total of 101 devices of FD were employed in 92 patients with 95 aneurysms, all of whom underwent successful operation. The incidence of neurological complications was 4.3% (4/92), which included 1 case of thromboembolic complication, 2 hemorrhagic events (1 death) and 1 case of postoperative irritability. Seventy-seven patients obtained clinical follow-up with a median of 12 (1-51) months. The mRS was 0 in 70 patients, 1 in 5, 2 in 1 and 3 in 1. There were 55 patients with 56 aneurysms who underwent the latest follow-up at a median of 6 (3-29) months post operation, and the complete occlusion (Grade D of OKM grading scale) rate was 71.4% (40/56), the in-stent stenosis rat was 7.1%(4/56). There were 52 patients with 53 aneurysms who obtained the 6-month imaging follow-up and the complete occlusion rate was 64.2% (34/53), the in-stent stenosis rat was 7.5%(4/53). Multivariate logistic regression showed that adjunctive coiling was the independent factor which affected the aneurysm occlusion rate at 6-month follow-up significantly (OR=8.98, 95% CI: 1.87-43.22, P=0.006). \n \n \nConclusions \nThe use of FD seems safe in the treatment of large unruptured intracranial aneurysms with a high procedure success rate. However, serious complications remain to be noted. Meanwhile, adjunctive coiling could promote the complete occlusion of intracranial aneurysms. \n \n \nKey words: \nIntracranial aneurysm; Treatment outcome; Postoperative complications; Large; Flow diverter","PeriodicalId":10100,"journal":{"name":"中华神经外科杂志","volume":"36 1","pages":"269-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华神经外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN112050-20190929-00422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of flow diverter (FD) in the treatment of large (maximum diameter≥10 mm) unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Methods A total of 92 patients harboring 95 large unruptured intracranial aneurysms who underwent treatment with FD (Pipeline + Tubridge) at Department of Cerebrovascular Intervention, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital from February 2015 to July 2019 were enrolled into this retrospective study. The modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used to evaluate the clinical outcomes at follow-up, and O′Kelly-Marotta (OKM) grading scale was used to evaluate the occlusion of aneurysm. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the influencing factors which could affect the aneurysm occlusion rate at 6-month follow-up. Results A total of 101 devices of FD were employed in 92 patients with 95 aneurysms, all of whom underwent successful operation. The incidence of neurological complications was 4.3% (4/92), which included 1 case of thromboembolic complication, 2 hemorrhagic events (1 death) and 1 case of postoperative irritability. Seventy-seven patients obtained clinical follow-up with a median of 12 (1-51) months. The mRS was 0 in 70 patients, 1 in 5, 2 in 1 and 3 in 1. There were 55 patients with 56 aneurysms who underwent the latest follow-up at a median of 6 (3-29) months post operation, and the complete occlusion (Grade D of OKM grading scale) rate was 71.4% (40/56), the in-stent stenosis rat was 7.1%(4/56). There were 52 patients with 53 aneurysms who obtained the 6-month imaging follow-up and the complete occlusion rate was 64.2% (34/53), the in-stent stenosis rat was 7.5%(4/53). Multivariate logistic regression showed that adjunctive coiling was the independent factor which affected the aneurysm occlusion rate at 6-month follow-up significantly (OR=8.98, 95% CI: 1.87-43.22, P=0.006). Conclusions The use of FD seems safe in the treatment of large unruptured intracranial aneurysms with a high procedure success rate. However, serious complications remain to be noted. Meanwhile, adjunctive coiling could promote the complete occlusion of intracranial aneurysms. Key words: Intracranial aneurysm; Treatment outcome; Postoperative complications; Large; Flow diverter
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血流分流器治疗颅内未破裂大动脉瘤的临床疗效分析
目的评价分流器(FD)治疗颅内未破裂大动脉瘤(最大直径≥10mm)的安全性和有效性。方法对2015年2月至2019年7月在郑州大学人民医院、河南省人民医院脑血管介入科接受FD(Pipeline+Tubridge)治疗的92例颅内未破裂大动脉瘤患者进行回顾性研究。采用改良的Rankin量表(mRS)评估随访时的临床结果,采用O’Kelly-Marotta(OKM)分级量表评估动脉瘤的闭塞情况。采用多因素logistic回归分析,探讨影响6个月随访动脉瘤闭塞率的因素。结果92例95个动脉瘤患者共使用了101个FD装置,均获得成功。神经系统并发症的发生率为4.3%(4/92),其中包括1例血栓栓塞并发症、2例出血事件(1例死亡)和1例术后应激反应。77名患者获得了平均12(1-51)个月的临床随访。mRS分别为0例、1例、2例和3例。55例56个动脉瘤患者在术后中位6(3-29)个月接受了最新随访,完全闭塞(OKM分级表D级)率为71.4%(40/56),支架内狭窄大鼠为7.1%(4/56),支架内狭窄大鼠占7.5%(4/53)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,辅助螺旋圈是影响6个月随访动脉瘤闭塞率的独立因素(OR=8.98,95%CI:1.87-43.22,P=0.006)。结论FD治疗颅内未破裂大动脉瘤安全,手术成功率高。然而,严重的并发症仍有待注意。同时,辅助栓塞可以促进颅内动脉瘤的完全闭塞。关键词:颅内动脉瘤;治疗结果;术后并发症;大型;分流器
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华神经外科杂志
中华神经外科杂志 Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10706
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Neurosurgery is one of the series of journals organized by the Chinese Medical Association under the supervision of the China Association for Science and Technology. The journal is aimed at neurosurgeons and related researchers, and reports on the leading scientific research results and clinical experience in the field of neurosurgery, as well as the basic theoretical research closely related to neurosurgery.Chinese Journal of Neurosurgery has been included in many famous domestic search organizations, such as China Knowledge Resources Database, China Biomedical Journal Citation Database, Chinese Biomedical Journal Literature Database, China Science Citation Database, China Biomedical Literature Database, China Science and Technology Paper Citation Statistical Analysis Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Full Text Database, Wanfang Data Database of Medical Journals, etc.
期刊最新文献
Methodology analysis of flash visual evoked potential and its preliminary application in intraoperative monitoring during operation of sellar region tumors Clinical efficacy analysis of flow diverter in the treatment of large unruptured intracranial aneurysms Microsurgical treatment of large and giant parasagittal meningioma invading the superior sagittal sinus Application of neuronavigation combined with yellow fluorescence staining in the resection of supratentorial glioma Relationship between tumor grade and postoperative delirium in adult patients with glioma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1