Intelligence Predicts Sensory Discrimination Ability but not Implicit Reward Learning

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Individual Differences Pub Date : 2020-12-12 DOI:10.31234/osf.io/qcgj3
Tyler A Sassenberg, Muchen Xi, Daiqing Zhao, Scott D. Blain, C. DeYoung
{"title":"Intelligence Predicts Sensory Discrimination Ability but not Implicit Reward Learning","authors":"Tyler A Sassenberg, Muchen Xi, Daiqing Zhao, Scott D. Blain, C. DeYoung","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/qcgj3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research has made use of sensory discrimination tasks that incorporate differential reinforcement schedules as a method for measuring individual differences in implicit reward learning. One such task utilizing a differential reinforcement schedule was popularized by Pizzagalli et al. (2005) with the intent of behaviorally assessing anhedonia and reward sensitivity. Various studies have examined implicit reward learning in relation to clinical symptoms and personality traits, including anhedonia, depression, and Extraversion. Despite extensive use of these tasks, they have not been extensively examined in relation to intelligence. Other research suggests positive associations of intelligence with sensory discrimination ability. The present study utilized a probabilistic reward task incorporating differential reinforcement in a large community sample to determine the relations among IQ, sensory discrimination ability, and implicit reward learning. Participants (N = 298) completed a sensory discrimination task, as well as an IQ test. IQ was not associated with participants’ levels of implicit reward learning but was positively associated with sensory discrimination ability. These findings provide further understanding of the complex relations among implicit learning, sensory discrimination ability, and intelligence.","PeriodicalId":47049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Differences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qcgj3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has made use of sensory discrimination tasks that incorporate differential reinforcement schedules as a method for measuring individual differences in implicit reward learning. One such task utilizing a differential reinforcement schedule was popularized by Pizzagalli et al. (2005) with the intent of behaviorally assessing anhedonia and reward sensitivity. Various studies have examined implicit reward learning in relation to clinical symptoms and personality traits, including anhedonia, depression, and Extraversion. Despite extensive use of these tasks, they have not been extensively examined in relation to intelligence. Other research suggests positive associations of intelligence with sensory discrimination ability. The present study utilized a probabilistic reward task incorporating differential reinforcement in a large community sample to determine the relations among IQ, sensory discrimination ability, and implicit reward learning. Participants (N = 298) completed a sensory discrimination task, as well as an IQ test. IQ was not associated with participants’ levels of implicit reward learning but was positively associated with sensory discrimination ability. These findings provide further understanding of the complex relations among implicit learning, sensory discrimination ability, and intelligence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智力预测感官辨别能力,但不能预测内隐奖励学习
先前的研究已经利用包含差异强化时间表的感觉辨别任务作为测量内隐奖励学习中个体差异的方法。Pizzagalli等人(2005)推广了一项利用差异强化计划的任务,目的是从行为学角度评估快感缺乏和奖励敏感性。各种研究考察了内隐奖励学习与临床症状和人格特征的关系,包括快感缺乏、抑郁和外向。尽管这些任务被广泛使用,但它们并没有得到与情报有关的广泛审查。其他研究表明,智力与感官辨别能力呈正相关。本研究在一个大的社区样本中使用了一个包含差异强化的概率奖励任务来确定智商、感觉辨别能力和内隐奖励学习之间的关系。参与者(N=298)完成了一项感官辨别任务和一项智商测试。智商与参与者的内隐奖励学习水平无关,但与感觉辨别能力呈正相关。这些发现进一步理解了内隐学习、感觉辨别能力和智力之间的复杂关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Individual Differences
Journal of Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Researchers, teachers, and students interested in all areas of individual differences (e.g., gender, temperament, personality, intelligence) and their assessment in human and animal research will find the Journal of Individual Differences useful. The Journal of Individual Differences publishes manuscripts dealing with individual differences in behavior, emotion, cognition, and their developmental aspects. This includes human as well as animal research. The Journal of Individual Differences is conceptualized to bring together researchers working in different areas ranging from, for example, molecular genetics to theories of complex behavior.
期刊最新文献
Validation of the Short Dark Tetrad (SD4) in Persian “Always Look on the Bright Side of Life” Being Flexible in Zuckerman’s Alternative Personality Space Stoicism Changing Ourselves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1