首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Individual Differences最新文献

英文 中文
“Always Look on the Bright Side of Life” "永远看清生活的光明面"
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000413
Sindhuja Sankaran, E. Szumowska, M. Kossowska
Abstract: Most research on depressive rumination is generally related to performance deterioration. Rumination, however, may be adaptive if it is associated with reflection, improving task performance. The mechanisms responsible for improved task performance related to rumination are not well-known. Thus, this study investigated the role of effort in understanding how people, high on reflection, engage in task performance. We argue that high reflectors would be more sensitive to “effort congruent” cues than low reflectors and would, therefore, take that extra step to invest more effort, which would then be translated into improved task performance. We manipulated motivational states of effort investment (effort enhancing vs. effort minimizing) and tested the effect of individual differences in reflection on the performance of the multiple-goal task. Results showed that high reflectors (vs. low) performed better when asked to focus on tasks requiring more effort. These new insights make a meaningful contribution to the dual model theory of rumination.
摘要:大多数关于抑郁性反刍的研究一般都与成绩下降有关。然而,如果反刍与反思相关联,则可能具有适应性,从而提高任务绩效。与反刍相关的任务绩效改善机制尚不为人知。因此,本研究对努力的作用进行了调查,以了解反思能力强的人是如何完成任务的。我们认为,反思能力强的人会比反思能力弱的人对 "努力一致 "的线索更敏感,因此会采取额外的步骤投入更多的努力,从而转化为任务绩效的提高。我们操纵了努力投入的动机状态(努力增强与努力减弱),并测试了反思的个体差异对多目标任务表现的影响。结果显示,当被要求集中精力完成需要付出更多努力的任务时,反思能力强的人(与反思能力弱的人)表现得更好。这些新见解为反刍的双重模型理论做出了有意义的贡献。
{"title":"“Always Look on the Bright Side of Life”","authors":"Sindhuja Sankaran, E. Szumowska, M. Kossowska","doi":"10.1027/1614-0001/a000413","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000413","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Most research on depressive rumination is generally related to performance deterioration. Rumination, however, may be adaptive if it is associated with reflection, improving task performance. The mechanisms responsible for improved task performance related to rumination are not well-known. Thus, this study investigated the role of effort in understanding how people, high on reflection, engage in task performance. We argue that high reflectors would be more sensitive to “effort congruent” cues than low reflectors and would, therefore, take that extra step to invest more effort, which would then be translated into improved task performance. We manipulated motivational states of effort investment (effort enhancing vs. effort minimizing) and tested the effect of individual differences in reflection on the performance of the multiple-goal task. Results showed that high reflectors (vs. low) performed better when asked to focus on tasks requiring more effort. These new insights make a meaningful contribution to the dual model theory of rumination.","PeriodicalId":47049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Differences","volume":"71 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139386080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Being Flexible in Zuckerman’s Alternative Personality Space 在祖克曼的另类人格空间中灵活变通
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000416
Đorđe Čekrlija, J. A. Schermer
Abstract: Psychological flexibility has attracted significant research interest but surprisingly, investigations about the relationships with personality traits from the biological models of personality have been neglected. The present study therefore aimed to shed more light on the nature of the relationship between psychological flexibility and personality dimensions from Zuckerman’s Alternative Five-Factor Model (AFFM) based on a sample of 398 adults. Psychological flexibility was negatively associated with neuroticism and positively associated with extraversion, aggressiveness, and sensation seeking. Lower neuroticism, higher extraversion, and being a woman significantly predicted approximately 39% of the variance in psychological flexibility. A joint exploratory factor analysis found psychological flexibility located in the neuroticism factor of personality. Findings show that the AFFM can be used as an adequate personality model in explaining the nature of psychological flexibility-inflexibility based on the associations between their sub-processes and lower levels of personality traits. The nature of the relationships between psychological flexibility with both sensation seeking and aggressiveness requires closer investigation.
摘要:心理灵活性已引起了广泛的研究兴趣,但令人惊讶的是,有关心理灵活性与人格生物模型中的人格特质之间关系的研究却一直被忽视。因此,本研究以 398 名成年人为样本,旨在进一步揭示心理灵活性与祖克曼的替代五因素模型(AFFM)中的人格维度之间的关系。心理弹性与神经质呈负相关,与外向性、攻击性和感觉寻求呈正相关。较低的神经质、较高的外向性和女性身份可显著预测约 39% 的心理灵活性变异。联合探索性因子分析发现,心理灵活性位于人格的神经质因子中。研究结果表明,AFFM 可以作为一个适当的人格模型,根据其子过程与较低层次人格特质之间的关联来解释心理弹性-灵活性的性质。心理灵活性与寻求感觉和攻击性之间关系的性质需要更深入的研究。
{"title":"Being Flexible in Zuckerman’s Alternative Personality Space","authors":"Đorđe Čekrlija, J. A. Schermer","doi":"10.1027/1614-0001/a000416","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000416","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Psychological flexibility has attracted significant research interest but surprisingly, investigations about the relationships with personality traits from the biological models of personality have been neglected. The present study therefore aimed to shed more light on the nature of the relationship between psychological flexibility and personality dimensions from Zuckerman’s Alternative Five-Factor Model (AFFM) based on a sample of 398 adults. Psychological flexibility was negatively associated with neuroticism and positively associated with extraversion, aggressiveness, and sensation seeking. Lower neuroticism, higher extraversion, and being a woman significantly predicted approximately 39% of the variance in psychological flexibility. A joint exploratory factor analysis found psychological flexibility located in the neuroticism factor of personality. Findings show that the AFFM can be used as an adequate personality model in explaining the nature of psychological flexibility-inflexibility based on the associations between their sub-processes and lower levels of personality traits. The nature of the relationships between psychological flexibility with both sensation seeking and aggressiveness requires closer investigation.","PeriodicalId":47049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Differences","volume":"26 26","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139000664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Stoicism 斯多葛主义
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000415
Adrian Furnham, C. Robinson
Abstract: This study examined stoicism as a coping style. Just over 500 people completed a new, short, multi-dimensional stoicism scale; a short measure of the Big Five (Bright-side personality); the PID-6BF which measures personality disorders along five dimensions (Dark-side personality), and various self-ratings. Analysis of the stoicism scale at both the domain and five facet levels showed that it was related to gender (males scored higher), education (graduates scored higher), trait Extraversion and Openness, as well as Detachment and Psychoticism. Regressions indicated that stoics were Closed-to-Experience, Introverted, and high on Detachment. There were many differences between the regression results onto the different factors. The adaptiveness of stoicism is discussed. Limitations are acknowledged.
摘要:本研究探讨了作为一种应对方式的委曲求全。500 多人完成了一个新的、简短的、多维度的委曲求全量表;一个简短的大五人格(光明面人格)测量;从五个维度测量人格障碍(阴暗面人格)的 PID-6BF 以及各种自我评分。对委曲求全量表在领域和五个方面的分析表明,它与性别(男性得分更高)、教育程度(毕业生得分更高)、特质外向性和开放性以及疏离性和精神病性有关。回归结果表明,斯多葛主义者对经验封闭、内向,并且具有较高的疏离感。不同因素的回归结果之间存在许多差异。讨论了委曲求全的适应性。同时也承认了其局限性。
{"title":"Stoicism","authors":"Adrian Furnham, C. Robinson","doi":"10.1027/1614-0001/a000415","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000415","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This study examined stoicism as a coping style. Just over 500 people completed a new, short, multi-dimensional stoicism scale; a short measure of the Big Five (Bright-side personality); the PID-6BF which measures personality disorders along five dimensions (Dark-side personality), and various self-ratings. Analysis of the stoicism scale at both the domain and five facet levels showed that it was related to gender (males scored higher), education (graduates scored higher), trait Extraversion and Openness, as well as Detachment and Psychoticism. Regressions indicated that stoics were Closed-to-Experience, Introverted, and high on Detachment. There were many differences between the regression results onto the different factors. The adaptiveness of stoicism is discussed. Limitations are acknowledged.","PeriodicalId":47049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Differences","volume":"132 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139011700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
High Subset Homogeneity Impairs Structural Validity of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale 高度子集同质性损害了巴拉特冲动量表的结构有效性
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2023-11-22 DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000407
Karl Schweizer, A. Gold, Dorothea Krampen
Abstract: Problems in providing evidence of structural validity of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) are addressed. As the German translation of a short version of the scale (BIS-15) included pairs of items with highly similar item statements, like the original English version, we hypothesized high subset homogeneity (HSH) as the source of these problems. HSH denotes a situation in which a subset of items shows a larger degree of homogeneity than the remainder of the items of the scale. In a sample of 287 university students, we investigated BIS data by means of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models including BIS factors only and models additionally including HSH factors. Whereas the models without HSH factors yielded model misfit, good model fit was observed for the models with HSH factors. These results suggested that BIS items basically showed structural validity, but this validity was impaired by HSH.
摘要:本文探讨了巴拉特冲动量表(BIS)在提供结构效度证据方面存在的问题。由于该量表的简短版本(BIS-15)的德文译本与英文原版一样,包含了几对项目陈述高度相似的项目,因此我们假设高子集同质性(HSH)是这些问题的根源。高子集同质性(HSH)指的是量表中某一子集项目比其余项目显示出更大程度的同质性。我们以 287 名大学生为样本,通过仅包含 BIS 因子的确认性因子分析(CFA)模型和额外包含 HSH 因子的模型对 BIS 数据进行了研究。在不包含 HSH 因子的模型中,模型拟合度较低,而在包含 HSH 因子的模型中,模型拟合度较高。这些结果表明,BIS 项目基本上具有结构效度,但这种效度受到了 HSH 的影响。
{"title":"High Subset Homogeneity Impairs Structural Validity of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale","authors":"Karl Schweizer, A. Gold, Dorothea Krampen","doi":"10.1027/1614-0001/a000407","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000407","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Problems in providing evidence of structural validity of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS) are addressed. As the German translation of a short version of the scale (BIS-15) included pairs of items with highly similar item statements, like the original English version, we hypothesized high subset homogeneity (HSH) as the source of these problems. HSH denotes a situation in which a subset of items shows a larger degree of homogeneity than the remainder of the items of the scale. In a sample of 287 university students, we investigated BIS data by means of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models including BIS factors only and models additionally including HSH factors. Whereas the models without HSH factors yielded model misfit, good model fit was observed for the models with HSH factors. These results suggested that BIS items basically showed structural validity, but this validity was impaired by HSH.","PeriodicalId":47049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Differences","volume":"162 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139249466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conscientiousness Can Predict Academic Performance – Even in High-Stake Setting 自觉性可以预测学习成绩--即使在高分环境中也是如此
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2023-11-22 DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000410
Daniel Danner, Stefan Höft
Abstract: We investigated, to what extent Conscientiousness can predict academic performance in a real application high-stakes setting. N = 267 applicants for a place at a university completed a Conscientiousness questionnaire during the selection process and 6 weeks after they commenced their studies. Students’ academic grades were used as criterion variables. The results suggest that the high-stakes setting increases the level of Conscientiousness reported, that not all applicants change their answers to the same extent and that the high-stakes setting decreases the criterion-related validity, but Conscientiousness remains a useful predictor for academic performance in high-stakes settings.
摘要:我们研究了 "自觉性 "在多大程度上可以预测实际应用中高风险环境下的学习成绩。N = 267 名大学入学申请人在选拔过程中和入学 6 周后填写了一份 "认真度 "问卷。学生的学业成绩被用作标准变量。结果表明,高风险环境会提高所报告的自觉性水平,并非所有申请者都会在相同程度上改变他们的答案,而且高风险环境会降低与标准相关的有效性,但自觉性仍然是高风险环境下预测学习成绩的有用指标。
{"title":"Conscientiousness Can Predict Academic Performance – Even in High-Stake Setting","authors":"Daniel Danner, Stefan Höft","doi":"10.1027/1614-0001/a000410","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000410","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: We investigated, to what extent Conscientiousness can predict academic performance in a real application high-stakes setting. N = 267 applicants for a place at a university completed a Conscientiousness questionnaire during the selection process and 6 weeks after they commenced their studies. Students’ academic grades were used as criterion variables. The results suggest that the high-stakes setting increases the level of Conscientiousness reported, that not all applicants change their answers to the same extent and that the high-stakes setting decreases the criterion-related validity, but Conscientiousness remains a useful predictor for academic performance in high-stakes settings.","PeriodicalId":47049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Differences","volume":"251 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139250612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Role of Just-World Beliefs in Predicting Dishonest Behavior 正义世界信念在预测不诚实行为中的作用
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2023-11-22 DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000412
Xin Tan, Lei Zhang, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Song Wu
Abstract: Belief in a just world is considered an important personal variable in studies on moral behavior. However, previous studies have found conflicting results regarding the relationship between belief in a just world and dishonest behavior. The present study examines the role of belief in a just world (for the self and others) in their tendency to engage in dishonest behavior, especially in situations highlighting attention for either the self or others. The results indicated that the belief in a just world for others (other-BJW) positively predicted dishonest behavior, whereas the belief in a just world for self (self-BJW) did not. However, the present study also found that the association between other-BJW and dishonesty disappeared when participants’ attention was focused on themselves. Based on these results, we suggest that future studies explore the potential mediating effects of moral disengagement.
摘要:在有关道德行为的研究中,对公正世界的信念被认为是一个重要的个人变量。然而,以往的研究发现,对公正世界的信念与不诚实行为之间关系的研究结果相互矛盾。本研究探讨了对公正世界(对自己和他人)的信念在他们从事不诚实行为的倾向中所起的作用,尤其是在强调关注自己或他人的情况下。结果表明,对他人公正世界的信念(other-BJW)能积极预测不诚实行为,而对自己公正世界的信念(self-BJW)则不能。然而,本研究还发现,当被试者的注意力集中在自己身上时,他人公正世界信念与不诚实行为之间的关联消失了。基于这些结果,我们建议未来的研究探索道德脱离的潜在中介效应。
{"title":"The Role of Just-World Beliefs in Predicting Dishonest Behavior","authors":"Xin Tan, Lei Zhang, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Song Wu","doi":"10.1027/1614-0001/a000412","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000412","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Belief in a just world is considered an important personal variable in studies on moral behavior. However, previous studies have found conflicting results regarding the relationship between belief in a just world and dishonest behavior. The present study examines the role of belief in a just world (for the self and others) in their tendency to engage in dishonest behavior, especially in situations highlighting attention for either the self or others. The results indicated that the belief in a just world for others (other-BJW) positively predicted dishonest behavior, whereas the belief in a just world for self (self-BJW) did not. However, the present study also found that the association between other-BJW and dishonesty disappeared when participants’ attention was focused on themselves. Based on these results, we suggest that future studies explore the potential mediating effects of moral disengagement.","PeriodicalId":47049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Differences","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139249559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changing Ourselves 改变我们自己
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2023-11-22 DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000408
Anna Sutton
Abstract: Change in personality is viewed in two contrasting ways. Sometimes it is seen as an indicator of psychopathology or inauthenticity, associated with reduced well-being. Yet the ability to change oneself is also viewed as a sign of positive self-development, a process of becoming more authentic and associated with increased well-being. This meta-analysis sought to compare these two perspectives and determine whether personality change can contribute to a good life. Sixteen independent samples (24,000 participants) were analyzed to test the relationships between traits change and authenticity, traits change and well-being, and values change and well-being. Trait change was positively related to authenticity, while value change was associated with increased well-being. Moderator analysis indicated that the type of change (over role or time) did not influence the relationship between trait change and authenticity, nor did the length of time over which change took place influence the personality change and well-being relationship. Including traits and values allows a more holistic understanding of personality change and demonstrates that personality change is not damaging to living well, having instead a minimally positive association with well-being and authenticity.
摘要:人们对人格变化有两种截然不同的看法。有时,它被视为精神病理学或不真实的指标,与幸福感降低有关。然而,改变自我的能力也被视为积极自我发展的标志,是一个变得更加真实的过程,与幸福感的增加有关。这项荟萃分析试图比较这两种观点,并确定人格改变是否有助于美好生活。对 16 个独立样本(24,000 名参与者)进行了分析,以检验特质变化与真实性、特质变化与幸福感以及价值观变化与幸福感之间的关系。特质变化与真实性呈正相关,而价值观变化与幸福感增加相关。调节分析表明,变化的类型(角色或时间)并不影响特质变化与真实性之间的关系,发生变化的时间长短也不影响个性变化与幸福感之间的关系。将特质和价值观包括在内,可以更全面地理解人格变化,并证明人格变化不会对美好生活造成损害,反而与幸福感和真实性有微弱的正相关。
{"title":"Changing Ourselves","authors":"Anna Sutton","doi":"10.1027/1614-0001/a000408","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000408","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Change in personality is viewed in two contrasting ways. Sometimes it is seen as an indicator of psychopathology or inauthenticity, associated with reduced well-being. Yet the ability to change oneself is also viewed as a sign of positive self-development, a process of becoming more authentic and associated with increased well-being. This meta-analysis sought to compare these two perspectives and determine whether personality change can contribute to a good life. Sixteen independent samples (24,000 participants) were analyzed to test the relationships between traits change and authenticity, traits change and well-being, and values change and well-being. Trait change was positively related to authenticity, while value change was associated with increased well-being. Moderator analysis indicated that the type of change (over role or time) did not influence the relationship between trait change and authenticity, nor did the length of time over which change took place influence the personality change and well-being relationship. Including traits and values allows a more holistic understanding of personality change and demonstrates that personality change is not damaging to living well, having instead a minimally positive association with well-being and authenticity.","PeriodicalId":47049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Differences","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139246763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Detecting Applicant Faking With a Context-Specific Overclaiming Questionnaire 通过针对具体情境的过度声称问卷检测申请人的造假行为
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2023-11-22 DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000411
Birk Diedenhofen, Adrian Hoffmann, F. Aust, Sascha Müller
Abstract: In the context of personnel selection, self-reports are often biased by social desirability. For example, applicants may overstate their knowledge to make a good impression on a potential employer. Overclaiming questionnaires (OCQs) offer a means to assess whether applicants claim to have knowledge that they do not have. Previous studies evaluating whether OCQs are capable of detecting faking in personnel selection contexts reported mixed results but did not take the fit between the content of OCQ items and the selection context into account. In the present study, we therefore tailored an OCQ to the specific application context and compared its performance to that of Residualized Individual Change Scores (RICS), a competing measure of faking based on an achievement motivation questionnaire. A total of 123 participants first answered the OCQ and the motivational questionnaire in a control condition without application context. The two measures were then completed again as part of a mock application process, and participants were asked to honestly report their faking behavior afterward. Participants exhibited more overclaiming in the application context than in the control condition. The OCQ and RICS scores predicted participants’ self-reported faking with comparable accuracy. These results suggest that OCQs can compete with other measures of faking if their content is appropriately tailored to the application context.
摘要:在人员选拔中,自我报告往往会因社会期望值而产生偏差。例如,申请人可能会夸大自己的知识,以便给潜在雇主留下好印象。过度声称问卷(OCQ)提供了一种方法来评估申请人是否声称拥有他们并不拥有的知识。以往的研究评估了过度声称问卷是否能够检测出人事选拔中的造假行为,结果不一,但没有考虑到过度声称问卷项目的内容与选拔环境之间的契合度。因此,在本研究中,我们根据具体的应用情境定制了OCQ,并将其性能与残差化个人变化分数(RICS)进行了比较,RICS是基于成就动机问卷的一种竞争性造假测量方法。共有 123 名参与者首先在无应用背景的对照条件下回答了 OCQ 和动机问卷。然后,在模拟申请过程中再次完成这两项测量,并要求参与者事后如实报告自己的造假行为。与对照组相比,参与者在申请情境中表现出更多的过度声称。OCQ 和 RICS 分数对参与者自我报告的造假行为的预测准确度相当。这些结果表明,如果OCQ的内容能根据应用情境进行适当调整,那么OCQ就能与其他假造行为测量方法相抗衡。
{"title":"Detecting Applicant Faking With a Context-Specific Overclaiming Questionnaire","authors":"Birk Diedenhofen, Adrian Hoffmann, F. Aust, Sascha Müller","doi":"10.1027/1614-0001/a000411","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000411","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: In the context of personnel selection, self-reports are often biased by social desirability. For example, applicants may overstate their knowledge to make a good impression on a potential employer. Overclaiming questionnaires (OCQs) offer a means to assess whether applicants claim to have knowledge that they do not have. Previous studies evaluating whether OCQs are capable of detecting faking in personnel selection contexts reported mixed results but did not take the fit between the content of OCQ items and the selection context into account. In the present study, we therefore tailored an OCQ to the specific application context and compared its performance to that of Residualized Individual Change Scores (RICS), a competing measure of faking based on an achievement motivation questionnaire. A total of 123 participants first answered the OCQ and the motivational questionnaire in a control condition without application context. The two measures were then completed again as part of a mock application process, and participants were asked to honestly report their faking behavior afterward. Participants exhibited more overclaiming in the application context than in the control condition. The OCQ and RICS scores predicted participants’ self-reported faking with comparable accuracy. These results suggest that OCQs can compete with other measures of faking if their content is appropriately tailored to the application context.","PeriodicalId":47049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Differences","volume":"218 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139248372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Civic-Mindedness Is More Than Personality 公民意识不仅仅是个性
IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2023-11-22 DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000414
J. C. Van Matre, René Bekkers, M. Huizinga, Arjen de Wit
Abstract: Many colleges and universities have embraced the goal of increasing students’ civic-mindedness. The research associated with theorizing and measuring civic-mindedness, however, has thus far progressed in a silo away from the established literature of personality psychology. This paper bridges this gap – adopting civic efficacy and service motivation as two measures of civic-mindedness – and examines how well they are explained by the five-factor model of personality (FFM). Using survey data from undergraduate students at a large, public research university, we estimated a structural equation model to measure personality traits from the FFM, service motivation, and civic efficacy. Results showed that variation in personality accounts for approximately 40% of the variation in Service Motivation and 53% of the variation in Civic Efficacy, which does not support a clear assertion that either construct can neatly be categorized as a facet of the FFM. Our findings provide an additional theoretical basis for community service learning courses and other educational opportunities that blend traditional pedagogical strategies with experiential and reflective opportunities aiming to produce change across state-like and trait-like attributes.
摘要:许多高校都把提高学生的公民意识作为目标。然而,迄今为止,与公民意识的理论化和测量相关的研究都是在远离人格心理学文献的孤岛上进行的。本文填补了这一空白--采用公民效能感和服务动机作为公民意识的两种衡量标准--并研究人格五因素模型(FFM)对它们的解释程度。利用一所大型公立研究型大学本科生的调查数据,我们估算了一个结构方程模型,以衡量 FFM 中的人格特质、服务动机和公民效能。结果显示,人格变异约占服务动机变异的 40%,占公民效能变异的 53%,这并不支持将这两种人格特征明确归类为 FFM 的一个方面。我们的研究结果为社区服务学习课程和其他教育机会提供了更多的理论依据,这些课程和机会将传统的教学策略与体验和反思机会相结合,旨在产生类似状态和类似特质的变化。
{"title":"Civic-Mindedness Is More Than Personality","authors":"J. C. Van Matre, René Bekkers, M. Huizinga, Arjen de Wit","doi":"10.1027/1614-0001/a000414","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000414","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Many colleges and universities have embraced the goal of increasing students’ civic-mindedness. The research associated with theorizing and measuring civic-mindedness, however, has thus far progressed in a silo away from the established literature of personality psychology. This paper bridges this gap – adopting civic efficacy and service motivation as two measures of civic-mindedness – and examines how well they are explained by the five-factor model of personality (FFM). Using survey data from undergraduate students at a large, public research university, we estimated a structural equation model to measure personality traits from the FFM, service motivation, and civic efficacy. Results showed that variation in personality accounts for approximately 40% of the variation in Service Motivation and 53% of the variation in Civic Efficacy, which does not support a clear assertion that either construct can neatly be categorized as a facet of the FFM. Our findings provide an additional theoretical basis for community service learning courses and other educational opportunities that blend traditional pedagogical strategies with experiential and reflective opportunities aiming to produce change across state-like and trait-like attributes.","PeriodicalId":47049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Differences","volume":"56 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139248602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reviewers 2023 评论者2023
4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000409
Free AccessReviewers 2023Published Online:October 12, 2023https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000409PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInReddit SectionsMoreThe colleagues listed below reviewed the incoming manuscripts very conscientiously and provided constructive hints for many of our authors. Furthermore, in most cases they reviewed quickly, which is a fundamental prerequisite for a rapid manuscript management. The editors of the Journal of Individual Differences are greatly indebted to all of them.Mutasem Mohammad AkourTobias AltmannChristine Altstötter-GleichAnton AlujaJeromy AnglimMenelaos ApostolouChristopher ArnoldMartin BäckströmJuan Ramón BarradaJonathan BartholomaeusTanja Gabriele BaudsonAndré BeauducelSebastian BergoldGentrit BerishaJutta BillinoBela BirkasGerhard BlickleKay BrauerVesna BuskoJacqueline CaemmererFranziska ClemensPetar ČolovićAndrew CooperDaniel DannerElena DapratiSarah Kate DavisNicola DöringSonja EtzlerEszter FerentziAurelio José FigueredoWilliam FleesonChristopher FrenchLennart FreythAdrian FurnhamMattis GeigerBulfone GiampieraTimo GnambsMario GollwitzerFriedrich GötzPeter HähnerMark Allen HamiltonJohanna HartungPhilipp Yorck HerzbergNadja HeymMichael HockFabio IbrahimAndré KerberCornelius J. KönigAndré KretzschmarVeena KumariNiclas KuperMichael LindenOliver LüdtkeBernd MarcusKarlijn MassarAndreas MokrosMarcus MundPatrick MusselIsabel Noack-LühnsdorfAdam PerkinsAlan PickeringJakob PietschnigMartin PinquartUlrich PreussRichard RauKarl-Heinz RennerDeborah South RichardsonLena RoemerCassie Ann ShortIva SolcovaAlexander StahlmannAngelika StefanDiana StegerGundula StollDaniel SullivanAngelina SutinIrma TalicAlain van HielTimo von OertzenJoshua WiltIngo ZettlerMatthias ZieglerNote. Due to the schedule for printing the journal, this list was compiled in September 2023. It comprises reviews undertaken between August 12, 2022 and September 25, 2023. Reviewers completing reviews after this date will be included in next year’s listing.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 44Issue 4October 2023ISSN: 1614-0001eISSN: 2151-2299 InformationJournal of Individual Differences (2023), 44, pp. 280-280 https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000409.© 2023Hogrefe PublishingPDF download
免费访问评论者2023出版在线:2023年10月12日https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000409PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack引文ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInReddit sectionsmore下面列出的同事非常认真地审查了来稿,并为我们的许多作者提供了建设性的提示。此外,在大多数情况下,他们的审查速度很快,这是快速稿件管理的基本前提。《个体差异杂志》的编辑们非常感谢他们所有人。Mutasem Mohammad AkourTobias AltmannChristine Altstötter-GleichAnton AlujaJeromy AnglimMenelaos ApostolouChristopher ArnoldMartin BäckströmJuan Ramón BarradaJonathan bartholomaeustja Gabriele baudsonandr beauducelbastian BergoldGentrit BerishaJutta BillinoBela BirkasGerhard BlickleKay BrauerVesna BuskoJacqueline CaemmererFranziska ClemensPetar ČolovićAndrew CooperDaniel DannerElena DapratiSarah Kate DavisNicola DöringSonja EtzlerEszter FerentziAurelio joss FigueredoWilliamFleesonChristopher FrenchLennart FreythAdrian FurnhamMattis GeigerBulfone GiampieraTimo GnambsMario GollwitzerFriedrich GötzPeter HähnerMark艾伦·汉密尔顿约翰娜·哈东菲利普·Yorck HerzbergNadja HeymMichael HockFabio ibrahimandr KerberCornelius J. KönigAndré KretzschmarVeena KumariNiclas KuperMichael LindenOliver l dtkebernd MarcusKarlijn MassarAndreas MokrosMarcus MundPatrick MusselIsabel noak - lhnsdorfadam PerkinsAlan PickeringJakob PietschnigMartin PinquartUlrich PreussRichard劳卡尔·海因茨·伦纳德博拉·南·理查森莱娜·罗默卡西·安·肖蒂瓦·索尔科瓦亚历山大·斯塔尔曼安吉丽卡·斯蒂芬戴安娜·斯蒂格·昆杜拉·斯托尔丹尼尔·沙利文安吉丽娜·苏蒂娜·伊尔玛·塔利卡兰·范·希尔蒂莫·冯·奥尔茨裘什·威尔廷戈·泽特勒马蒂亚斯·齐格勒由于期刊印刷的日程安排,本清单于2023年9月编制。它包括在2022年8月12日至2023年9月25日期间进行的审查。在此日期之后完成评论的评论者将被包含在明年的列表中。FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails vol . 44 issue 4October 2023 issn: 1614-0001eISSN: 2151-2299 InformationJournal of Individual Differences (2023), 44, pp. 280-280 https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000409.©2023Hogrefe PublishingPDF下载
{"title":"Reviewers 2023","authors":"","doi":"10.1027/1614-0001/a000409","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000409","url":null,"abstract":"Free AccessReviewers 2023Published Online:October 12, 2023https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000409PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInReddit SectionsMoreThe colleagues listed below reviewed the incoming manuscripts very conscientiously and provided constructive hints for many of our authors. Furthermore, in most cases they reviewed quickly, which is a fundamental prerequisite for a rapid manuscript management. The editors of the Journal of Individual Differences are greatly indebted to all of them.Mutasem Mohammad AkourTobias AltmannChristine Altstötter-GleichAnton AlujaJeromy AnglimMenelaos ApostolouChristopher ArnoldMartin BäckströmJuan Ramón BarradaJonathan BartholomaeusTanja Gabriele BaudsonAndré BeauducelSebastian BergoldGentrit BerishaJutta BillinoBela BirkasGerhard BlickleKay BrauerVesna BuskoJacqueline CaemmererFranziska ClemensPetar ČolovićAndrew CooperDaniel DannerElena DapratiSarah Kate DavisNicola DöringSonja EtzlerEszter FerentziAurelio José FigueredoWilliam FleesonChristopher FrenchLennart FreythAdrian FurnhamMattis GeigerBulfone GiampieraTimo GnambsMario GollwitzerFriedrich GötzPeter HähnerMark Allen HamiltonJohanna HartungPhilipp Yorck HerzbergNadja HeymMichael HockFabio IbrahimAndré KerberCornelius J. KönigAndré KretzschmarVeena KumariNiclas KuperMichael LindenOliver LüdtkeBernd MarcusKarlijn MassarAndreas MokrosMarcus MundPatrick MusselIsabel Noack-LühnsdorfAdam PerkinsAlan PickeringJakob PietschnigMartin PinquartUlrich PreussRichard RauKarl-Heinz RennerDeborah South RichardsonLena RoemerCassie Ann ShortIva SolcovaAlexander StahlmannAngelika StefanDiana StegerGundula StollDaniel SullivanAngelina SutinIrma TalicAlain van HielTimo von OertzenJoshua WiltIngo ZettlerMatthias ZieglerNote. Due to the schedule for printing the journal, this list was compiled in September 2023. It comprises reviews undertaken between August 12, 2022 and September 25, 2023. Reviewers completing reviews after this date will be included in next year’s listing.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 44Issue 4October 2023ISSN: 1614-0001eISSN: 2151-2299 InformationJournal of Individual Differences (2023), 44, pp. 280-280 https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000409.© 2023Hogrefe PublishingPDF download","PeriodicalId":47049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Differences","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135707951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Individual Differences
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1