Clinical profile and surgical outcome of pars plana vitrectomy in non-diabetic vitreous hemorrhage

IF 2.3 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/25158414221083366
R. Shrestha, R. Shah, Purushottam Joshi, S. Parajuli
{"title":"Clinical profile and surgical outcome of pars plana vitrectomy in non-diabetic vitreous hemorrhage","authors":"R. Shrestha, R. Shah, Purushottam Joshi, S. Parajuli","doi":"10.1177/25158414221083366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Spontaneous vitreous hemorrhage is one of the common causes of ocular emergency. There are very few prospective studies on the clinical profile and surgical outcomes for patients with dense vitreous hemorrhage caused by non-diabetic and non-traumatic till date to our knowledge. Objectives: This study was conducted to better understand the etiologies, clinical profile, surgical outcome, and visual prognosis following pars plana vitrectomy for dense vitreous hemorrhage in adults with non-traumatic and non-diabetic retinopathy. Design: This was a prospective interventional study. Methods: This study was conducted in Mechi Eye Hospital (Birtamod, Nepal) from October 2018 to September 2019. All consecutive cases, 46 eyes of 46 patients, with vitreous hemorrhage that underwent vitrectomy were included in our study. There were 14 (30.4%) female and 32 (69.6%) male patients, and the average age at presentation was 43.74 ± 16.19 (17–84) years. The success rate of surgery in terms of visual outcome was evaluated. Results: The most common cause of vitreous hemorrhage was retinal vasculitis with fibrovascular changes and vascular sheathing 19 (41%). The indication of vitrectomy on patient demand was 20 (43.5%). Success rate of surgery in terms of visual outcome (functional outcome) was defined as final visual acuity of >6/60 which was 86.9%. Conclusion: The most common cause of spontaneous vitreous hemorrhage in our study was retinal vasculitis with fibrovascular changes and vascular sheathing. Vitrectomy has a good surgical outcome for spontaneous vitreous hemorrhage in terms of visual outcome (functional outcome) unless guarded by other factors like chorioretinal atrophy followed by optic atrophy and epiretinal membrane.","PeriodicalId":23054,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25158414221083366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spontaneous vitreous hemorrhage is one of the common causes of ocular emergency. There are very few prospective studies on the clinical profile and surgical outcomes for patients with dense vitreous hemorrhage caused by non-diabetic and non-traumatic till date to our knowledge. Objectives: This study was conducted to better understand the etiologies, clinical profile, surgical outcome, and visual prognosis following pars plana vitrectomy for dense vitreous hemorrhage in adults with non-traumatic and non-diabetic retinopathy. Design: This was a prospective interventional study. Methods: This study was conducted in Mechi Eye Hospital (Birtamod, Nepal) from October 2018 to September 2019. All consecutive cases, 46 eyes of 46 patients, with vitreous hemorrhage that underwent vitrectomy were included in our study. There were 14 (30.4%) female and 32 (69.6%) male patients, and the average age at presentation was 43.74 ± 16.19 (17–84) years. The success rate of surgery in terms of visual outcome was evaluated. Results: The most common cause of vitreous hemorrhage was retinal vasculitis with fibrovascular changes and vascular sheathing 19 (41%). The indication of vitrectomy on patient demand was 20 (43.5%). Success rate of surgery in terms of visual outcome (functional outcome) was defined as final visual acuity of >6/60 which was 86.9%. Conclusion: The most common cause of spontaneous vitreous hemorrhage in our study was retinal vasculitis with fibrovascular changes and vascular sheathing. Vitrectomy has a good surgical outcome for spontaneous vitreous hemorrhage in terms of visual outcome (functional outcome) unless guarded by other factors like chorioretinal atrophy followed by optic atrophy and epiretinal membrane.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玻璃体切割治疗非糖尿病性玻璃体出血的临床特点及手术效果
背景:自发性玻璃体出血是眼部急症的常见原因之一。据我们所知,迄今为止关于非糖尿病和非创伤性玻璃体致密出血患者的临床特征和手术结果的前瞻性研究很少。目的:本研究旨在更好地了解非外伤性和非糖尿病性视网膜病变的成人密集玻璃体出血的玻璃体平面肌切除术后的病因、临床特点、手术结果和视力预后。设计:这是一项前瞻性干预性研究。方法:本研究于2018年10月至2019年9月在尼泊尔比塔莫德梅奇眼科医院进行。我们的研究包括所有连续的病例,46例患者的46只眼,因玻璃体出血而行玻璃体切除术。女性14例(30.4%),男性32例(69.6%),平均发病年龄43.74±16.19(17-84)岁。从视觉效果方面评估手术成功率。结果:玻璃体出血最常见的原因是视网膜血管炎伴纤维血管改变和血管鞘改变19例(41%)。应患者要求行玻璃体切除术的患者占43.5%。手术在视力(功能)方面的成功率定义为最终视力为bb0 6/60,为86.9%。结论:自发性玻璃体出血最常见的原因是视网膜血管炎伴纤维血管改变和血管鞘。对于自发性玻璃体出血,玻璃体切除术在视力(功能)方面具有良好的手术效果,除非有其他因素的保护,如绒毛膜视网膜萎缩继发视神经萎缩和视网膜前膜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The efficacy and safety of continuous blanket suture for severe recurrent pterygium with symblepharon. The experiences of visually impaired military veterans with Charles Bonnet syndrome. Are depression, anxiety and loneliness associated with visual hallucinations in younger adults with Charles Bonnet syndrome? Clinical characteristics of allergic conjunctivitis in the Southern region of Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Optical coherence tomography angiography to assess for retinal vascular changes in Neuro-Sjögren.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1