Inner speech as a brain mechanism for preconditioning creativity process

I. Kuznetsov, Nataliia Kozachuk, T. Kachynska, O. Zhuravlov, O. Zhuravlova, O. Rakovets
{"title":"Inner speech as a brain mechanism for preconditioning creativity process","authors":"I. Kuznetsov, Nataliia Kozachuk, T. Kachynska, O. Zhuravlov, O. Zhuravlova, O. Rakovets","doi":"10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.1.koz","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current domain of creativity studies is characterized by a high diversity of psychological and neuroscience techniques and methods researchers use. However, the role of verbal processes, especially inner speech, remains underrepresented in this area. Existing studies point to the heterogeneity of inner speech brain mechanisms involved in creative thinking. While consciously controlled verbalized thoughts are associated with the activity of task-dependent brain networks (TPN), especially lateral-frontoparietal network (L-FPN), non-voluntary, mind-wandering thoughts are supposed to correlate with default-mode networks (DMN) activity. While DMN activity leads to an increased number of creative ideas, L-FPN activity results in fewer ideas but increased idea originality. From this point, rest state and state of getting prepared (preconditioning) to task completion, when both mind-wandering and control thoughts occur, are of specific interest. In our study, 49 volunteers completed divergent thinking tasks with rest state and preconditioning state preceded. We later divided all participants into two groups – with low and high creativity levels based on their performance during divergent tasks. EEG was recorded during rest state and preconditioning state and analyzed based on power spectrum and sLORETA data. Our results show an essential role of preconditioning alpha-2 EEG subband in creative thinking performance. The originality of the task solution correlates with the activity of L-FPN structures, while DMN activity does not differ significantly between the two groups.\nDisclosure statement\nNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.","PeriodicalId":36553,"journal":{"name":"East European Journal of Psycholinguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Journal of Psycholinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.1.koz","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current domain of creativity studies is characterized by a high diversity of psychological and neuroscience techniques and methods researchers use. However, the role of verbal processes, especially inner speech, remains underrepresented in this area. Existing studies point to the heterogeneity of inner speech brain mechanisms involved in creative thinking. While consciously controlled verbalized thoughts are associated with the activity of task-dependent brain networks (TPN), especially lateral-frontoparietal network (L-FPN), non-voluntary, mind-wandering thoughts are supposed to correlate with default-mode networks (DMN) activity. While DMN activity leads to an increased number of creative ideas, L-FPN activity results in fewer ideas but increased idea originality. From this point, rest state and state of getting prepared (preconditioning) to task completion, when both mind-wandering and control thoughts occur, are of specific interest. In our study, 49 volunteers completed divergent thinking tasks with rest state and preconditioning state preceded. We later divided all participants into two groups – with low and high creativity levels based on their performance during divergent tasks. EEG was recorded during rest state and preconditioning state and analyzed based on power spectrum and sLORETA data. Our results show an essential role of preconditioning alpha-2 EEG subband in creative thinking performance. The originality of the task solution correlates with the activity of L-FPN structures, while DMN activity does not differ significantly between the two groups. Disclosure statement No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内在言语作为一种预设创造过程的大脑机制
当前的创造力研究领域的特点是研究人员使用的心理和神经科学技术和方法的高度多样性。然而,语言过程的作用,特别是内心语言,在这一领域仍然没有得到充分的体现。现有的研究指出,创造性思维中涉及的内部言语脑机制存在异质性。虽然有意识控制的言语化思想与任务依赖的大脑网络(TPN),特别是侧额顶叶网络(L-FPN)的活动有关,但非自愿的、走神的思想被认为与默认模式网络(DMN)的活动有关。DMN活动增加了创造性想法的数量,而L-FPN活动减少了想法,但增加了想法的原创性。从这一点来看,休息状态和准备完成任务的状态(预处理),当走神和控制思想发生时,是特别有趣的。在我们的研究中,49名志愿者在休息状态和预处理状态下完成发散思维任务。随后,我们根据参与者在不同任务中的表现,将他们分成两组——创造力水平高和低。记录静息状态和预处理状态下的脑电图,根据功率谱和sLORETA数据进行分析。我们的研究结果表明,预处理α -2脑电图子带在创造性思维表现中起着重要作用。任务解决方案的独创性与L-FPN结构的活性相关,而DMN的活性在两组之间没有显著差异。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
East European Journal of Psycholinguistics
East European Journal of Psycholinguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Axiological dimension of citizenship and patriotism in a worldview of Kazakhs: A psycholinguistic study The Language of the Weather Forecast in Italian and Spanish Television Broadcasts: Linguistic-Descriptive Analysis of the End of Winter on RTVE and TG5 Television Channels Psycholinguistic and cognitive-semiotic dimensions of constructing fear in horror films: A multimodal perspective Linguistic and semiotic representation of pessimism in The Happy Prince and Other Tales by Oscar Wilde On the Impact of Mode of Presentation and Age on Parsing Structurally Ambiguous Relative Clauses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1