Good health care for a good life? The case of down syndrome

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2022-09-21 DOI:10.1111/jppi.12443
Francine A. van den Driessen Mareeuw, Antonia M. W. Coppus, Diana M. J. Delnoij, Esther de Vries
{"title":"Good health care for a good life? The case of down syndrome","authors":"Francine A. van den Driessen Mareeuw,&nbsp;Antonia M. W. Coppus,&nbsp;Diana M. J. Delnoij,&nbsp;Esther de Vries","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>People with Down syndrome have complex health care needs which are not always fully met. Health care improvements are required to better meet these needs. Quality indicators are an important tool for improving health care. However, quality indicators for health care for people with Down syndrome are scarce. Existing quality indicators focus on medical (physical) needs or the clinical setting, even though it is acknowledged that quality measures should reflect the <i>total</i> of quality aspects relevant to the population at stake, which may encompass aspects <i>beyond</i> the medical domain. These aspects beyond the medical domain are the focus of the current paper, which aims to provide insight into the way people with Down syndrome live their lives, how health care may fit in, and how this may impact the development of quality indicators. The paper is based on data originating from interviews with people with Down syndrome and their parents as well as focus groups with support staff members working in assisted living facilities for people with intellectual disability. The data revealed a lot of variation in how people with Down syndrome live their lives. Nevertheless, we were able to identify 11 topics, which we grouped into three overarching themes: (1) Being different yet living a normal life; (2) Down syndrome-(un)friendly society and services; and (3) family perspective. The variation in our data stresses the importance of health care that takes a person's life into account beyond the medical domain, as exemplified by the identified topics. Our findings also show that a good life is not merely depending on good health care supported by well-defined quality indicators, but on (support in) all life domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.12443","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jppi.12443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

People with Down syndrome have complex health care needs which are not always fully met. Health care improvements are required to better meet these needs. Quality indicators are an important tool for improving health care. However, quality indicators for health care for people with Down syndrome are scarce. Existing quality indicators focus on medical (physical) needs or the clinical setting, even though it is acknowledged that quality measures should reflect the total of quality aspects relevant to the population at stake, which may encompass aspects beyond the medical domain. These aspects beyond the medical domain are the focus of the current paper, which aims to provide insight into the way people with Down syndrome live their lives, how health care may fit in, and how this may impact the development of quality indicators. The paper is based on data originating from interviews with people with Down syndrome and their parents as well as focus groups with support staff members working in assisted living facilities for people with intellectual disability. The data revealed a lot of variation in how people with Down syndrome live their lives. Nevertheless, we were able to identify 11 topics, which we grouped into three overarching themes: (1) Being different yet living a normal life; (2) Down syndrome-(un)friendly society and services; and (3) family perspective. The variation in our data stresses the importance of health care that takes a person's life into account beyond the medical domain, as exemplified by the identified topics. Our findings also show that a good life is not merely depending on good health care supported by well-defined quality indicators, but on (support in) all life domains.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
良好的医疗保健才能带来良好的生活?唐氏综合症的例子
唐氏综合症患者有复杂的卫生保健需求,这些需求并不总是得到充分满足。为了更好地满足这些需求,需要改善卫生保健。质量指标是改善卫生保健的重要工具。然而,针对唐氏综合症患者的卫生保健质量指标很少。现有的质量指标侧重于医疗(身体)需求或临床环境,尽管人们承认,质量措施应反映与相关人口有关的质量方面的总和,其中可能包括医疗领域以外的方面。这些医学领域之外的方面是当前论文的重点,旨在深入了解唐氏综合症患者的生活方式,医疗保健如何适应,以及这可能如何影响质量指标的发展。这篇论文的数据来源于对唐氏综合症患者及其父母的访谈,以及对在智障人士辅助生活设施工作的支持人员的焦点小组。数据显示,唐氏综合症患者的生活方式存在很多差异。尽管如此,我们还是确定了11个主题,并将其分为三个主要主题:(1)过着不同的正常生活;(2)唐氏综合症-(不)友好的社会和服务;(3)家庭视角。我们数据的变化强调了医疗保健的重要性,将一个人的生命考虑到医疗领域之外,如确定的主题所示。我们的研究结果还表明,美好的生活不仅取决于良好的医疗保健和明确的质量指标,还取决于所有生活领域的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Specialized medical equipment for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities allocated in Home and Community Based Services Issue Information Remote consultation: The experiences of community intellectual disability teams Advances and gaps in policy, practice, and research in transition for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities across four countries “It does change the narrative for health and social care” views of clinical and homeless service staff about the use of intellectual disability screening tools within homeless support pathways in the north of England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1