ВНЕШНЯЯ ОЦЕНКА КАЧЕСТВА ОБЩЕГО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ КАК ФАКТОР ПРОФЕССИОНАЛЬНОГО РАЗВИТИЯ ПЕДАГОГОВ

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science Pub Date : 2017-07-09 DOI:10.17853/1994-5639-2017-6-52-70
T. V. Potemkinа, T. I. Pudenko, A. Rudneva
{"title":"ВНЕШНЯЯ ОЦЕНКА КАЧЕСТВА ОБЩЕГО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ КАК ФАКТОР ПРОФЕССИОНАЛЬНОГО РАЗВИТИЯ ПЕДАГОГОВ","authors":"T. V. Potemkinа, T. I. Pudenko, A. Rudneva","doi":"10.17853/1994-5639-2017-6-52-70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction . Nowadays, foreign and Russian researchers state the lack of reliable tools for diagnostics of professional gaps among teachers. It is unjustified to draw conclusions about skill level of teachers, relying only on results which are shown by pupils when holding unified state examinations and monitoring tests. However, information on results of an external assessment of quality of the general education (the USE, OGE, All-Russian test works and national researches of quality of education) corresponds to professional development of teachers and more rational organization of this process. The aim of the article is to consider and discuss the relationship between professional development of teachers and external assessment of the quality of general education; the search of opportunities and terms of the results use of external evaluation procedures in teacher training. Methodology and research methods . The authors analyzed the publications (available on the Internet and in periodicals) to determine the relevance of the problem and compare approaches to its solution by Russian and foreign researchers. The methods involve content analysis, problem-based and comparative analysis for the diagnosis of the current practices of teachers’ professional development. The purpose of the analysis is the inclusion of education quality assessment and evaluation results in the contents of programs of professional development of teachers. Results . The created request for the profitability analysis results of an external assessment of general education quality of professional development of pedagogical staff is observed. However, the analysis of modern practice of additional professional pedagogical education showed that the preparation to prevails; certification procedure results for improvement of pedagogical activity are rarely used. The main reasons for this situation are found out: lack of the target information products for system of professional development prepared by results of certification and monitoring procedures; lack of unified methodological and methodical approaches to development of programs of professional development of teachers; insufficient development of expert and analytical activity at regional institutes of professional development. Change of the situation is possible based on the following complex measures: development of practice of direct diagnostics of teachers’ competences; adoptions of administrative decisions following the results of estimated procedures; interactions of institutes of professional development, higher education institutions, schools, methodical services and governing bodies of education for creation of flexible and mobile organizational and methodical resources for professional development; combinations of formal and informal teachers’ education experience. Scientific novelty . The practicability of results implementation for external education quality evaluation organization promoting professional growth of teachers is proved. The generalized characteristic of current practice in professional development of teachers based on an assessment of the quality of education is given. Practical significance . Organizational and pedagogical conditions for the improvement of the system of educators’ professional development are proposed.","PeriodicalId":44143,"journal":{"name":"Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2017-6-52-70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction . Nowadays, foreign and Russian researchers state the lack of reliable tools for diagnostics of professional gaps among teachers. It is unjustified to draw conclusions about skill level of teachers, relying only on results which are shown by pupils when holding unified state examinations and monitoring tests. However, information on results of an external assessment of quality of the general education (the USE, OGE, All-Russian test works and national researches of quality of education) corresponds to professional development of teachers and more rational organization of this process. The aim of the article is to consider and discuss the relationship between professional development of teachers and external assessment of the quality of general education; the search of opportunities and terms of the results use of external evaluation procedures in teacher training. Methodology and research methods . The authors analyzed the publications (available on the Internet and in periodicals) to determine the relevance of the problem and compare approaches to its solution by Russian and foreign researchers. The methods involve content analysis, problem-based and comparative analysis for the diagnosis of the current practices of teachers’ professional development. The purpose of the analysis is the inclusion of education quality assessment and evaluation results in the contents of programs of professional development of teachers. Results . The created request for the profitability analysis results of an external assessment of general education quality of professional development of pedagogical staff is observed. However, the analysis of modern practice of additional professional pedagogical education showed that the preparation to prevails; certification procedure results for improvement of pedagogical activity are rarely used. The main reasons for this situation are found out: lack of the target information products for system of professional development prepared by results of certification and monitoring procedures; lack of unified methodological and methodical approaches to development of programs of professional development of teachers; insufficient development of expert and analytical activity at regional institutes of professional development. Change of the situation is possible based on the following complex measures: development of practice of direct diagnostics of teachers’ competences; adoptions of administrative decisions following the results of estimated procedures; interactions of institutes of professional development, higher education institutions, schools, methodical services and governing bodies of education for creation of flexible and mobile organizational and methodical resources for professional development; combinations of formal and informal teachers’ education experience. Scientific novelty . The practicability of results implementation for external education quality evaluation organization promoting professional growth of teachers is proved. The generalized characteristic of current practice in professional development of teachers based on an assessment of the quality of education is given. Practical significance . Organizational and pedagogical conditions for the improvement of the system of educators’ professional development are proposed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育质量外部评价作为教师职业发展的因素
介绍。如今,外国和俄罗斯的研究人员表示,缺乏可靠的工具来诊断教师之间的专业差距。仅根据学生在举行统一的国家考试和监测考试时所显示的结果来断定教师的技能水平是不合理的。然而,关于通识教育质量的外部评估结果的信息(USE、OGE、全俄测试作品和国家教育质量研究)与教师的专业发展和更合理地组织这一过程相对应。本文旨在思考和探讨通识教育质量外部评价与教师专业发展的关系;在教师培训中利用外部评价程序寻找机会和结果条件。方法论和研究方法。作者分析了这些出版物(在互联网和期刊上),以确定问题的相关性,并比较了俄罗斯和外国研究人员解决问题的方法。运用内容分析法、问题分析法和比较分析法对教师专业发展现状进行诊断。分析的目的是将教育质量评价和评价结果纳入教师专业发展规划的内容。结果。观察到对教师专业发展通识教育质量外部评价的盈利分析结果提出的要求。然而,对现代附加专业教育实践的分析表明,备考盛行;很少使用改进教学活动的认证程序结果。找出了造成这种情况的主要原因:缺乏通过认证结果和监控程序编制的专业发展体系目标信息产品;教师专业发展计划的制定缺乏统一的方法和方法;区域专业发展研究所的专家和分析活动发展不足。要改变这种状况,需要采取以下综合措施:开展教师能力直接诊断的实践;根据估计程序的结果通过行政决定;专业发展机构、高等教育机构、学校、系统服务和教育理事机构之间的相互作用,为专业发展创造灵活和流动的组织和系统资源;正式和非正式教师教育经验的结合。科学的新奇。验证了外部教育质量评价机构实施结果促进教师专业成长的可行性。提出了当前基于教育质量评价的教师专业发展实践的总体特征。现实意义。提出了完善教育工作者专业发展体系的组织条件和教学条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science
Obrazovanie i Nauka-Education and Science EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
42.90%
发文量
56
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ensuring the unity of the federal system of scientific and methodological support for teacher professional development: Opportunities and risks Influence of academic-professional hardiness on the subjective well-being of students in socionomic professions Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Bystander strategies Contemporary contexts of higher medical education development: Patient-centred care in medical students’ understanding Publication activity of Russian university students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1