Clausewitz and the Personality Characteristics of the Battlefield Commander in British and German Military Doctrine, 1918–1941

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q2 HISTORY War in History Pub Date : 2022-05-18 DOI:10.1177/09683445221084141
M. Samuels
{"title":"Clausewitz and the Personality Characteristics of the Battlefield Commander in British and German Military Doctrine, 1918–1941","authors":"M. Samuels","doi":"10.1177/09683445221084141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even after the First World War, the British and German armies remained strongly influenced by Clausewitz, for whom personality rather than mass was the best means to reduce friction. This article explores how this was reflected in their military doctrine between the two world wars. The German regulations showed a clear alignment with Clausewitz's thinking. The British tended to focus on the characteristics Clausewitz had argued were necessary for the troops, rather than for their commanders. The campaigns of 1939/40 caused the Germans to place even greater emphasis on boldness, while the British focused on steadiness and caution.","PeriodicalId":44606,"journal":{"name":"War in History","volume":"30 1","pages":"122 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"War in History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09683445221084141","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Even after the First World War, the British and German armies remained strongly influenced by Clausewitz, for whom personality rather than mass was the best means to reduce friction. This article explores how this was reflected in their military doctrine between the two world wars. The German regulations showed a clear alignment with Clausewitz's thinking. The British tended to focus on the characteristics Clausewitz had argued were necessary for the troops, rather than for their commanders. The campaigns of 1939/40 caused the Germans to place even greater emphasis on boldness, while the British focused on steadiness and caution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克劳塞维茨与英德军事理论中战场指挥官的人格特征,1918-1941
即使在第一次世界大战后,英国和德国军队仍然深受克劳塞维茨的影响,对他来说,个人而不是群众是减少摩擦的最佳手段。本文探讨了这一点在两次世界大战之间的军事学说中是如何反映出来的。德国的规章制度与克劳塞维茨的思想明显一致。英国人倾向于把重点放在克劳塞维茨所说的部队所必需的特征上,而不是他们的指挥官。1939年至1940年的战争使德国人更加强调大胆,而英国人则注重稳定和谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
War in History
War in History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: War in History journal takes the view that military history should be integrated into a broader definition of history, and benefits from the insights provided by other approaches to history. Recognising that the study of war is more than simply the study of conflict, War in History embraces war in all its aspects: > Economic > Social > Political > Military Articles include the study of naval forces, maritime power and air forces, as well as more narrowly defined military matters. There is no restriction as to period: the journal is as receptive to the study of classical or feudal warfare as to Napoleonic. This journal provides you with a continuous update on war in history over many historical periods.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Building the Army’s Backbone: Canadian Non-Commissioned Officers in the Second World War by Andrew L. Brown Book Review: Out of Line, Out of Place. A Global and Local History of World War I Internments by Rotem Kowner and Iris Rachamimov Book Review: A Question of Standing: The History of the CIA by Rhodri Jeffreys-Jones Book Review: Secession and Separatist Conflicts in Postcolonial Africa by Charles G. Thomas and Toyin Falola Book Review: Winning and Losing the Nuclear Peace: The Rise, Demise, and Revival of Arms Control by Michael Krepon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1