Condemned by desire: miscegenation, gender, and eroticism in South Africa’s Immorality Act

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 AREA STUDIES Social Dynamics-A Journal of African Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/02533952.2023.2195216
Laura Moutinho
{"title":"Condemned by desire: miscegenation, gender, and eroticism in South Africa’s Immorality Act","authors":"Laura Moutinho","doi":"10.1080/02533952.2023.2195216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Mixed Marriage Act of 1949 is regarded as the first law of South Africa’s apartheid regime. This criminalised interracial marriages, regulating intimacy under the amended Immorality Act (1950) with the aim of organising the public sphere and preventing miscegenation. In the present article, I analyse two cases involving interracial couples and alleged lovers. I argue that this system of exclusion refounded the State, managing gender and sexuality through race and racism in order to avoid miscegenation. Although the apartheid system was internationally known, via its public face, as creating segregation between whites and blacks, I claim that vigilance and control of intimacy and domestic space, based on gender and sexuality, were part and parcel of the management of race and racism. Following Coetzee, I understand apartheid as a form of containment of interracial desire. In this analysis, Brazil appears as a counterpoint to this project: sometimes implicitly, sometimes explicitly. My objective here is to contribute to the understanding of processes of regulation of intimacy and public space in the Global South.","PeriodicalId":51765,"journal":{"name":"Social Dynamics-A Journal of African Studies","volume":"49 1","pages":"130 - 149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Dynamics-A Journal of African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02533952.2023.2195216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Mixed Marriage Act of 1949 is regarded as the first law of South Africa’s apartheid regime. This criminalised interracial marriages, regulating intimacy under the amended Immorality Act (1950) with the aim of organising the public sphere and preventing miscegenation. In the present article, I analyse two cases involving interracial couples and alleged lovers. I argue that this system of exclusion refounded the State, managing gender and sexuality through race and racism in order to avoid miscegenation. Although the apartheid system was internationally known, via its public face, as creating segregation between whites and blacks, I claim that vigilance and control of intimacy and domestic space, based on gender and sexuality, were part and parcel of the management of race and racism. Following Coetzee, I understand apartheid as a form of containment of interracial desire. In this analysis, Brazil appears as a counterpoint to this project: sometimes implicitly, sometimes explicitly. My objective here is to contribute to the understanding of processes of regulation of intimacy and public space in the Global South.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被欲望谴责:南非不道德法案中的通婚、性别和色情
1949年的《混血婚姻法》被认为是南非种族隔离政权的第一部法律。该法案将异族通婚定为犯罪,根据修订后的《不道德法》(1950年)规范亲密行为,目的是组织公共领域和防止异族通婚。在本文中,我分析了两个涉及跨种族夫妇和所谓恋人的案件。我认为,这种排斥制度重塑了国家,通过种族和种族主义来管理性别和性,以避免异族通婚。虽然种族隔离制度在国际上通过它的公众形象被认为造成了白人和黑人之间的隔离,但我认为,基于性别和性取向的对亲密关系和家庭空间的警惕和控制,是种族和种族主义管理的重要组成部分。跟着库切的思路,我把种族隔离理解为一种对种族间欲望的遏制。在这种分析中,巴西似乎是这个项目的对立面:有时是含蓄的,有时是明确的。我在这里的目的是为理解全球南方国家的亲密关系和公共空间的监管过程做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Social Dynamics is the journal of the Centre for African Studies at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. It has been published since 1975, and is committed to advancing interdisciplinary academic research, fostering debate and addressing current issues pertaining to the African continent. Articles cover the full range of humanities and social sciences including anthropology, archaeology, economics, education, history, literary and language studies, music, politics, psychology and sociology.
期刊最新文献
Ke mosali oa Mosotho : reflecting on indigenous conceptions of womanhood in Lesotho Strategic protest and the negotiation of legibility in Cape Town: a case study of Reclaim the City Rituals, family connections, and BoRakgadi Intellectual decolonisation and the danger of epistemic closure: the need for a critical decolonial theory Why recognition? Deciphering justice claims in 2016 Anglophone Crisis in Cameroon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1