Meditating for the Planet: Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention on Sustainable Consumption Behaviors

IF 5.2 2区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environment and Behavior Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI:10.1177/0013916519880897
Sonja M. Geiger, Daniel Fischer, Ulf Schrader, P. Grossman
{"title":"Meditating for the Planet: Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention on Sustainable Consumption Behaviors","authors":"Sonja M. Geiger, Daniel Fischer, Ulf Schrader, P. Grossman","doi":"10.1177/0013916519880897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research suggests that mindfulness may foster sustainable consumption behavior through the reduction of the so-called attitude–behavior gap, or by weakening material values while increasing subjective well-being. The current controlled longitudinal study tested these propositions by employing a sustainability-adapted mindfulness-based intervention (sMBI) to two different samples (n = 60 university students; n = 71 employees). Although the intervention successfully enhanced mindful experiences in both samples, we found no evidence for neither direct effects on sustainable consumption behavior or related attitudes, nor for the reduction of the attitude–behavior gap. However, the intervention led to greater well-being in the student sample and suggested a decline of materialistic value orientations in both samples. The results blunt previous claims about potential causal effects of mindfulness practice on sustainable consumption behavior. Nevertheless, they indicate that the sMBI affects behavior-distal variables, such as material values and well-being, which in turn could influence consumption behavior in the long run.","PeriodicalId":48374,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Behavior","volume":"52 1","pages":"1012 - 1042"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0013916519880897","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916519880897","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

Recent research suggests that mindfulness may foster sustainable consumption behavior through the reduction of the so-called attitude–behavior gap, or by weakening material values while increasing subjective well-being. The current controlled longitudinal study tested these propositions by employing a sustainability-adapted mindfulness-based intervention (sMBI) to two different samples (n = 60 university students; n = 71 employees). Although the intervention successfully enhanced mindful experiences in both samples, we found no evidence for neither direct effects on sustainable consumption behavior or related attitudes, nor for the reduction of the attitude–behavior gap. However, the intervention led to greater well-being in the student sample and suggested a decline of materialistic value orientations in both samples. The results blunt previous claims about potential causal effects of mindfulness practice on sustainable consumption behavior. Nevertheless, they indicate that the sMBI affects behavior-distal variables, such as material values and well-being, which in turn could influence consumption behavior in the long run.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沉思地球:基于正念的干预对可持续消费行为的影响
最近的研究表明,正念可以通过减少所谓的态度-行为差距,或者在增加主观幸福感的同时削弱物质价值,来促进可持续的消费行为。目前的对照纵向研究通过对两个不同的样本(n=60名大学生;n=71名员工)采用可持续性适应性正念干预(sMBI)来测试这些命题。尽管干预成功地增强了两个样本的正念体验,但我们没有发现任何证据表明这既不会对可持续消费行为或相关态度产生直接影响,也不会减少态度-行为差距。然而,干预使学生样本的幸福感更强,并表明两个样本的物质主义价值取向都有所下降。这一结果削弱了之前关于正念练习对可持续消费行为潜在因果影响的说法。然而,他们表明,sMBI影响行为的远端变量,如物质价值和幸福感,从长远来看,这反过来又可能影响消费行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Environment & Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal designed to report rigorous experimental and theoretical work focusing on the influence of the physical environment on human behavior at the individual, group, and institutional levels.
期刊最新文献
Cross-Cultural Applications of the New Ecological Paradigm in Protected Area Contexts Evidence on the Effectiveness-Acceptance Trade-Off Between Forced Active Choice and Default Nudging: A Field Study to Reduce Meat Consumption in Cafeterias Ecological Dominance Orientation as a predictor of Wildlife Value Orientations and Support for Lethal Wildlife Management Psychosocial Determinants of Lyme Disease Preventive Behavior Among Outdoor Recreationists Spatial Optimism and Cross-Over Effects in the Perceptions of Interconnected Wildfire, Flood, and Mudslide Hazards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1