“We Will Probably Figure It out Eventually.” How Secondary Students Read and Comprehend News Articles About Illiteracy

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Reading Psychology Pub Date : 2022-11-03 DOI:10.1080/02702711.2022.2128953
Florian C. Feucht, M. Michaelson, Nathan E. Ziegler, L. Maziarz, Susan B. Hany
{"title":"“We Will Probably Figure It out Eventually.” How Secondary Students Read and Comprehend News Articles About Illiteracy","authors":"Florian C. Feucht, M. Michaelson, Nathan E. Ziegler, L. Maziarz, Susan B. Hany","doi":"10.1080/02702711.2022.2128953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This exploratory qualitative study gathered data on adolescents’ mental models of illiteracy before and after they read news articles on the topic and explored their epistemic beliefs about illiteracy and news articles as a knowledge source. Engaging with the news requires critical thinking and civic engagement, both central components of education in a democratic society. In order to investigate how students run and revise their mental models in the face of these demands, researchers provided twelve students from a rural, Midwestern high school with news articles on the topic of illiteracy. Using semi-structured interviews, think-alouds, and hands-on close reading activities, researchers tracked how participants’ beliefs on the source and stability of knowledge illustrated their epistemic beliefs about illiteracy, as well as how they established criteria in sorting information across texts. The study found that most participants showed the ability to incorporate better ways of thinking about illiteracy after engaging in a guided reading activity, and some subsequently exhibited changes in their epistemic beliefs on the topic. The findings provide insight into how adolescent learners approach news articles in classroom reading activities and how their epistemic beliefs interact with their engagement.","PeriodicalId":46567,"journal":{"name":"Reading Psychology","volume":"44 1","pages":"32 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2128953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This exploratory qualitative study gathered data on adolescents’ mental models of illiteracy before and after they read news articles on the topic and explored their epistemic beliefs about illiteracy and news articles as a knowledge source. Engaging with the news requires critical thinking and civic engagement, both central components of education in a democratic society. In order to investigate how students run and revise their mental models in the face of these demands, researchers provided twelve students from a rural, Midwestern high school with news articles on the topic of illiteracy. Using semi-structured interviews, think-alouds, and hands-on close reading activities, researchers tracked how participants’ beliefs on the source and stability of knowledge illustrated their epistemic beliefs about illiteracy, as well as how they established criteria in sorting information across texts. The study found that most participants showed the ability to incorporate better ways of thinking about illiteracy after engaging in a guided reading activity, and some subsequently exhibited changes in their epistemic beliefs on the topic. The findings provide insight into how adolescent learners approach news articles in classroom reading activities and how their epistemic beliefs interact with their engagement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们最终可能会弄清楚。”中学生如何阅读和理解有关文盲的新闻文章
摘要本研究收集了青少年阅读相关新闻前后的文盲心理模型数据,探讨了青少年对文盲和新闻作为知识来源的认知信念。参与新闻需要批判性思维和公民参与,这两者都是民主社会教育的核心组成部分。为了调查学生在面对这些要求时是如何运行和修改他们的思维模式的,研究人员向来自中西部一所农村高中的12名学生提供了有关文盲主题的新闻文章。通过半结构化访谈、大声思考和动手细读活动,研究人员追踪了参与者对知识来源和稳定性的信念如何说明他们对文盲的认知信念,以及他们如何建立跨文本信息分类的标准。研究发现,大多数参与者在参加了引导阅读活动后,表现出了更好地思考文盲问题的能力,一些人随后在这个话题上表现出了认知信念的变化。这些发现为青少年学习者如何在课堂阅读活动中处理新闻文章以及他们的认知信念如何与他们的参与相互作用提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reading Psychology
Reading Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Prepared exclusively by professionals, this refereed journal publishes original manuscripts in the fields of literacy, reading, and related psychology disciplines. Articles appear in the form of completed research; practitioner-based "experiential" methods or philosophical statements; teacher and counselor preparation services for guiding all levels of reading skill development, attitudes, and interests; programs or materials; and literary or humorous contributions.
期刊最新文献
Unhinged: Reading Comprehension Tests as Gatekeepers to Teaching The Regularity of High-Frequency Words (Sight Words): Teacher Phonetic Knowledge is Key Investigating the Mechanisms Behind Relations Between Academic Language and Reading Comprehension: The Role of Reading Self-Concept and Reading Enjoyment An Exploration of the Impact of Quality Illustrations in Children’s Picture Books on Preschool Student Narrative Ability Metalinguistic Effects on English Spelling: A Structural Equation Model for Early Literacy Instruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1