Solutions Journalism in Practice: The Tension Between Critical and Compelling Presentation of Solutions in BBC’s Social Media Video Stories

IF 0.9 Q3 COMMUNICATION Media Literacy and Academic Research Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI:10.34135/mlar-23-01-07
Petra Kovačević
{"title":"Solutions Journalism in Practice: The Tension Between Critical and Compelling Presentation of Solutions in BBC’s Social Media Video Stories","authors":"Petra Kovačević","doi":"10.34135/mlar-23-01-07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study delves into the emerging field of solutions journalism, which strives to report on social issues by highlighting responses to them, while maintaining a critical stance. Specifically, this study investigates how solutions journalism guidelines are understood and implemented in a specific newsroom at the BBC that specializes in producing solution-focused social media videos aimed primarily at younger audiences. To this end, the study adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining content analysis of the BBC’s solutions video stories with semi-structured interviews with editors and journalists. The analysis reveals a significant disparity between the team’s understanding of solutions journalism as a practice that thoroughly scrutinizes solutions and the actual content of the stories they produce. Notably, over half of the sample videos fail to include at least one of the following essential elements that ensure the critical presentation of solutions: the identification of the cause of the problem, an acknowledgment of the limitations of the proposed solutions, or the provision of hard evidence of the effectiveness of the solutions. The findings suggest that various factors in the production process hinder the implementation of these guidelines, including the reliance on audience metrics, the need to comply with Facebook’s algorithm, and the perceived preferences of social media audiences. The production process is subject to three competing demands: maintaining a predominantly positive tone, creating an interesting story, and presenting a simple narrative. Consequently, the presentation of solutions leaves little room for critical evaluation by the audience.","PeriodicalId":40792,"journal":{"name":"Media Literacy and Academic Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media Literacy and Academic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34135/mlar-23-01-07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study delves into the emerging field of solutions journalism, which strives to report on social issues by highlighting responses to them, while maintaining a critical stance. Specifically, this study investigates how solutions journalism guidelines are understood and implemented in a specific newsroom at the BBC that specializes in producing solution-focused social media videos aimed primarily at younger audiences. To this end, the study adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining content analysis of the BBC’s solutions video stories with semi-structured interviews with editors and journalists. The analysis reveals a significant disparity between the team’s understanding of solutions journalism as a practice that thoroughly scrutinizes solutions and the actual content of the stories they produce. Notably, over half of the sample videos fail to include at least one of the following essential elements that ensure the critical presentation of solutions: the identification of the cause of the problem, an acknowledgment of the limitations of the proposed solutions, or the provision of hard evidence of the effectiveness of the solutions. The findings suggest that various factors in the production process hinder the implementation of these guidelines, including the reliance on audience metrics, the need to comply with Facebook’s algorithm, and the perceived preferences of social media audiences. The production process is subject to three competing demands: maintaining a predominantly positive tone, creating an interesting story, and presenting a simple narrative. Consequently, the presentation of solutions leaves little room for critical evaluation by the audience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实践中的解决方案新闻:BBC社交媒体视频故事中关键和引人注目的解决方案呈现之间的紧张关系
这项研究深入研究了新兴的解决方案新闻领域,该领域致力于通过强调对社会问题的回应来报道社会问题,同时保持批评立场。具体而言,这项研究调查了英国广播公司专门制作主要针对年轻观众的以解决方案为重点的社交媒体视频的特定新闻编辑室如何理解和实施解决方案新闻指南。为此,该研究采用了混合方法,将BBC解决方案视频故事的内容分析与对编辑和记者的半结构化采访相结合。该分析揭示了团队对解决方案的理解——新闻业是一种彻底审查解决方案的实践——与他们制作的故事的实际内容之间存在显著差异。值得注意的是,超过一半的样本视频没有包括以下至少一个基本要素,以确保关键地提出解决方案:确定问题原因,承认拟议解决方案的局限性,或提供解决方案有效性的确凿证据。研究结果表明,制作过程中的各种因素阻碍了这些准则的实施,包括对受众指标的依赖、遵守Facebook算法的必要性,以及社交媒体受众的感知偏好。制作过程受制于三个相互竞争的要求:保持积极的基调,创造有趣的故事,以及呈现简单的叙事。因此,解决方案的提出几乎没有给观众留下批判性评价的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
27.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Solutions Journalism in Practice: The Tension Between Critical and Compelling Presentation of Solutions in BBC’s Social Media Video Stories Covid-19 as a Black Swan. University Education Adaptation to Online Learning in the Second Wave of the Coronavirus Pandemic from the Perspective of Students and Academics Beyond Media Education: Assessing News Media Literacy in Media Students of Public and Private Universities in Pakistan Moderating Effect of Gender and Socioeconomic Status on the Relationship Between Media Exposure and Violent Behaviour Not Just for Laughs – Using Comics to Burst the Fake-News Bubble
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1