Pakistan: wither tax reforms — the case of large taxpayers’ unit, Islamabad

IF 1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Tax Reform Pub Date : 2018-12-29 DOI:10.15826/JTR.2018.4.3.052
M. A. Ahmed
{"title":"Pakistan: wither tax reforms — the case of large taxpayers’ unit, Islamabad","authors":"M. A. Ahmed","doi":"10.15826/JTR.2018.4.3.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pakistan tax system reforms carried out during 2001–2010, were overwhelming, expensive, and a failure. The reforms were financially afforded and technically assisted by World Bank. While both Government of Pakistan and World Bank agreed on the failure of tax reforms, each blamed the other for the failure. A consensus, however, does exist as regards the fact that the reform program left the tax system more gridlocked, retrofitted, and incapacitated than before to generate both sufficient and healthy revenues. The paper adopts case study approach to explore into the factors of failure of the reform program. The study is anchored in Large Taxpayers’ Unit, Islamabad — a flagship taxing field formation established under the reform project. The data are produced from Large Taxpayers’ Unit, Islamabad, to assess its jurisdictional, functional, and operational capacity and explain why its tax collection curve flattens after 2012. The insights so derived at micro-level are made to feed back into macro-canvass of the program and enhance our holistic understanding and see its failure in a different and closer-to-reality light. The analysis is extrapolated to the national level to argue that as soon as political ownership and donor oversight — the key drivers — were omitted from the equation, the resultant resource constrains were enough to frustrate and fail the entire reform program. The conclusions drawn are generalizable to most similarly-circumstanced developing countries and their rigidly underperforming tax systems. Highlights 1. The evaluation of a tax reform program being essentially subjective could well be undertaken by adopting case study approach that generates empirics at micro-level, which get fed into the analytics at the macro-level 2. In order for the tax reform evaluation to stay comprehensively meaningful, it covers the micro locale being evaluated across its full spectrum i.e. jurisdictional, functional, and operational capacity 3. Continued political ownership and donor oversight are key variables of a tax reform program, and their elimination from the equation mid-stream potentially results in reversing and even perverting the entire reform agenda FOR CITATION Ahmed M. A. Pakistan: wither tax reforms — the case of large taxpayers’ unit, Islamabad. Journal of Tax Reform , 2018, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 202–222. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2018.4.3.052 ARTICLE INFO Received August 30, 2018; accepted December 9, 2018","PeriodicalId":53924,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tax Reform","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tax Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/JTR.2018.4.3.052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Pakistan tax system reforms carried out during 2001–2010, were overwhelming, expensive, and a failure. The reforms were financially afforded and technically assisted by World Bank. While both Government of Pakistan and World Bank agreed on the failure of tax reforms, each blamed the other for the failure. A consensus, however, does exist as regards the fact that the reform program left the tax system more gridlocked, retrofitted, and incapacitated than before to generate both sufficient and healthy revenues. The paper adopts case study approach to explore into the factors of failure of the reform program. The study is anchored in Large Taxpayers’ Unit, Islamabad — a flagship taxing field formation established under the reform project. The data are produced from Large Taxpayers’ Unit, Islamabad, to assess its jurisdictional, functional, and operational capacity and explain why its tax collection curve flattens after 2012. The insights so derived at micro-level are made to feed back into macro-canvass of the program and enhance our holistic understanding and see its failure in a different and closer-to-reality light. The analysis is extrapolated to the national level to argue that as soon as political ownership and donor oversight — the key drivers — were omitted from the equation, the resultant resource constrains were enough to frustrate and fail the entire reform program. The conclusions drawn are generalizable to most similarly-circumstanced developing countries and their rigidly underperforming tax systems. Highlights 1. The evaluation of a tax reform program being essentially subjective could well be undertaken by adopting case study approach that generates empirics at micro-level, which get fed into the analytics at the macro-level 2. In order for the tax reform evaluation to stay comprehensively meaningful, it covers the micro locale being evaluated across its full spectrum i.e. jurisdictional, functional, and operational capacity 3. Continued political ownership and donor oversight are key variables of a tax reform program, and their elimination from the equation mid-stream potentially results in reversing and even perverting the entire reform agenda FOR CITATION Ahmed M. A. Pakistan: wither tax reforms — the case of large taxpayers’ unit, Islamabad. Journal of Tax Reform , 2018, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 202–222. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2018.4.3.052 ARTICLE INFO Received August 30, 2018; accepted December 9, 2018
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴基斯坦:税收改革失败——以大型纳税人单位伊斯兰堡为例
巴基斯坦在2001-2000年期间进行的税收制度改革是压倒性的、昂贵的和失败的。世界银行为这些改革提供了资金和技术援助。虽然巴基斯坦政府和世界银行都同意税收改革的失败,但双方都将失败归咎于对方。然而,对于改革计划使税收系统比以前更加堵塞、改造和丧失能力,以产生足够和健康的收入这一事实,确实存在共识。本文采用案例研究的方法,对改革方案失败的因素进行了探讨。这项研究以伊斯兰堡大型纳税人单位为基础,该单位是根据改革项目成立的旗舰税务部门。这些数据来自伊斯兰堡的大型纳税人单位,用于评估其管辖权、职能和运营能力,并解释为什么其税收曲线在2012年后趋于平缓。从微观层面得出的见解将反馈到该计划的宏观研究中,增强我们的整体理解,并从不同和更接近现实的角度看待其失败。该分析被推断到国家层面,认为一旦政治所有权和捐助者监督——这两个关键驱动因素——从等式中被忽略,由此产生的资源限制就足以挫败和失败整个改革计划。得出的结论可推广到处境最相似的发展中国家及其表现不佳的税收制度。亮点1。对税收改革计划的评估本质上是主观的,可以通过采用案例研究方法来进行,该方法在微观层面产生经验,并将其纳入宏观层面的分析2。为了使税收改革评估保持全面的意义,它涵盖了正在评估的微观地区的全方位,即管辖权、职能和运营能力3。持续的政治所有权和捐助者监督是税收改革计划的关键变量,在中期将其从等式中删除可能会逆转甚至扭曲整个改革议程。《税收改革杂志》,2018年,第4卷,第3期,第202–222页。DOI:10.15826/jtr.2018.4.3.052文章信息收到时间:2018年8月30日;2018年12月9日接受
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Tax Reform
Journal of Tax Reform BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
MSMEs Tax Compliance in Indonesia During Pandemic COVID-19: The Role of Risk Preference as Moderation The influence of foreign ownership on tax avoidance in Thailand: A study from an emerging economy Rationality of the Tax and Economic Behavior of Enterprises in the Russian Forestry Sector Economic Growth and Optimal Tax Burden: A Case of Uzbekistan’s Economy The Impact of Indirect Taxation on Inequality in Russia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1