Effects of Communication Style on Competence Evaluations of Soccer Referees: Procedural Versus Relational Framing

IF 3.2 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Communication & Sport Pub Date : 2021-12-29 DOI:10.1177/21674795211046536
C. Burgers, T. van Biemen, Ruben van Eeghen, D. Mann
{"title":"Effects of Communication Style on Competence Evaluations of Soccer Referees: Procedural Versus Relational Framing","authors":"C. Burgers, T. van Biemen, Ruben van Eeghen, D. Mann","doi":"10.1177/21674795211046536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Good communication skills are important for soccer referees, but it remains unclear what exactly constitutes good referee communication. In this article, we focus on the role of verbal framing by soccer referees by contrasting the effects of procedural frames (focusing on rules and regulations) and relational frames (focusing on relational aspects) on perceptions of referee competence. We conducted an experiment (N = 97) in which soccer referees used either procedural or relational frames to communicate about different types of in-game situations (yellow card and offside) to players. Results demonstrate that spectator perceptions of impartiality and confidence did not differ depending on the type of frame used. However, relational (vs. procedural) frames did increase spectator perceptions of respectfulness and communication skills. Soccer referees are recommended to use relational over procedural frames when communicating to players during a match.","PeriodicalId":46882,"journal":{"name":"Communication & Sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication & Sport","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795211046536","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Good communication skills are important for soccer referees, but it remains unclear what exactly constitutes good referee communication. In this article, we focus on the role of verbal framing by soccer referees by contrasting the effects of procedural frames (focusing on rules and regulations) and relational frames (focusing on relational aspects) on perceptions of referee competence. We conducted an experiment (N = 97) in which soccer referees used either procedural or relational frames to communicate about different types of in-game situations (yellow card and offside) to players. Results demonstrate that spectator perceptions of impartiality and confidence did not differ depending on the type of frame used. However, relational (vs. procedural) frames did increase spectator perceptions of respectfulness and communication skills. Soccer referees are recommended to use relational over procedural frames when communicating to players during a match.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沟通方式对足球裁判能力评价的影响:程序框架与关系框架
良好的沟通技巧对足球裁判来说很重要,但目前尚不清楚什么是良好的裁判沟通能力。在本文中,我们通过对比程序框架(侧重于规则和条例)和关系框架(侧重于关系方面)对裁判能力感知的影响,重点研究了足球裁判语言框架的作用。我们进行了一项实验(N = 97),在实验中,足球裁判使用程序框架或关系框架向球员传达不同类型的游戏情境(黄牌和越位)。结果表明,观众的公正性和信心的看法并不不同,取决于所使用的框架类型。然而,关系框架(相对于程序框架)确实增加了观众对尊重和沟通技巧的感知。建议足球裁判在比赛中与球员沟通时使用关系框架而不是程序框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
‘Discursive Interpretations of Cultural Symbols in Mega Sporting Events: The Case of Messi’s Bisht at the 2022 World Cup’ 10 Years of Communication & Sport: A Review of Theory, Method, and Authorship It’s ‘Gut Feeling’ Mostly: Online Hate, Uncivil Comments and Content Moderation in Australian Sports Media ‘Your Analysis Is as Useless as Your Ovaries’: Women Football Fans’ Experiences on Social Media Media Coverage of Sports Concussion: An Experimental Study of Framing Effects on Community Injury Perceptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1