What the Rise of AI Means for Narrative Studies: A Response to “Why Computers Will Never Read (or Write) Literature” by Angus Fletcher

IF 0.5 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE NARRATIVE Pub Date : 2022-01-28 DOI:10.1353/nar.2022.0005
Jon Chun, Katherine Elkins
{"title":"What the Rise of AI Means for Narrative Studies: A Response to “Why Computers Will Never Read (or Write) Literature” by Angus Fletcher","authors":"Jon Chun, Katherine Elkins","doi":"10.1353/nar.2022.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:The role of AI in narrative studies is not a question of if but of when and of how we humans prepare for such a future. The if claim is addressed with a detailed rebuttal to Angus Fletcher’s ‘Why Computers Will Never Read (or Write) Literature.” A counter-argument based upon key AI concepts, the historical progress of AI, and landmark failures and breakthroughs brings readers up to date on the current state of AI as it relates to narrative studies. Numerous examples explain why the cycle of AI winters and springs is now broken, and there is a new global AI arms race. Scholars now have a windfall of increasingly sophisticated, multi-million dollar models that can analyze and generate narrative. Still, in light of the inherent complexity of natural language and the current limitations of even these state-of-the-art AI models, a human-in-the-loop is essential for the foreseeable future. We attempt to allay common yet misplaced concerns by reasserting the centrality of the human scholar to guide and interpret while using these tools. Leveraging these new AI models will yield new insights for narrative studies, and this important work will include shaping the language of fairness, equality, and ethics of models that increasingly impact the lives of billions. We invite narrative scholars to participate in this growing interdisciplinary movement that chooses active engagement over passive critique.","PeriodicalId":45865,"journal":{"name":"NARRATIVE","volume":"30 1","pages":"104 - 113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NARRATIVE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2022.0005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT:The role of AI in narrative studies is not a question of if but of when and of how we humans prepare for such a future. The if claim is addressed with a detailed rebuttal to Angus Fletcher’s ‘Why Computers Will Never Read (or Write) Literature.” A counter-argument based upon key AI concepts, the historical progress of AI, and landmark failures and breakthroughs brings readers up to date on the current state of AI as it relates to narrative studies. Numerous examples explain why the cycle of AI winters and springs is now broken, and there is a new global AI arms race. Scholars now have a windfall of increasingly sophisticated, multi-million dollar models that can analyze and generate narrative. Still, in light of the inherent complexity of natural language and the current limitations of even these state-of-the-art AI models, a human-in-the-loop is essential for the foreseeable future. We attempt to allay common yet misplaced concerns by reasserting the centrality of the human scholar to guide and interpret while using these tools. Leveraging these new AI models will yield new insights for narrative studies, and this important work will include shaping the language of fairness, equality, and ethics of models that increasingly impact the lives of billions. We invite narrative scholars to participate in this growing interdisciplinary movement that chooses active engagement over passive critique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能的兴起对叙事研究意味着什么:对安格斯·弗莱彻《为什么计算机永远不会阅读(或写作)文学》的回应
摘要:人工智能在叙事研究中的作用不是是否存在的问题,而是我们人类何时以及如何为这样的未来做好准备的问题。对安格斯·弗莱彻的《为什么计算机永远不会读(或写)文学》进行了详细的反驳基于关键人工智能概念、人工智能的历史进步以及里程碑式的失败和突破的反驳,让读者了解了人工智能与叙事研究的最新状态。许多例子解释了为什么人工智能的冬春循环现在被打破,出现了一场新的全球人工智能军备竞赛。学者们现在有了一笔意外之财,他们拥有越来越复杂、价值数百万美元的模型,可以分析和生成叙事。尽管如此,鉴于自然语言固有的复杂性,以及即使是这些最先进的人工智能模型目前的局限性,在可预见的未来,一个处于循环中的人是必不可少的。我们试图通过重申人类学者在使用这些工具时进行指导和解释的中心地位来减轻常见但错误的担忧。利用这些新的人工智能模型将为叙事研究带来新的见解,这项重要的工作将包括塑造越来越影响数十亿人生活的模型的公平、平等和道德语言。我们邀请叙事学者参与这场日益发展的跨学科运动,选择主动参与而非被动批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NARRATIVE
NARRATIVE LITERATURE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
Mad about the "Boys"? Desire, Revulsion, and (Mis)Recognition in Varro's Eumenides "To Become a Warrior and a Son to My Father": Aleksandr Aleksandrov's (Nadezhda Durova) Notes of a Cavalry Maiden (1836) as Transgender Autobiography "How to Become a Rock": Non-Human Metaphors as Trans Paranarratives Transforming Paratext: A Transgender Touch across Time in Confessions of the Fox Trans-forming Narratology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1