General cognitive ability, as assessed by self-reported ACT scores, is associated with reduced emotional responding: Evidence from a Dynamic Affect Reactivity Task

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Intelligence Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2023.101760
Michael D. Robinson , Roberta L. Irvin , Todd A. Pringle , Robert J. Klein
{"title":"General cognitive ability, as assessed by self-reported ACT scores, is associated with reduced emotional responding: Evidence from a Dynamic Affect Reactivity Task","authors":"Michael D. Robinson ,&nbsp;Roberta L. Irvin ,&nbsp;Todd A. Pringle ,&nbsp;Robert J. Klein","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2023.101760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Dual process theories often contrast a hot, reactive affective system with a cool, reflective cognitive system. The cognitive system permits rationality and reasoning, but may inhibit spontaneous affect. Such frameworks would seem to suggest that individual differences in general cognitive ability, which is linked to abstract forms of reasoning, may impact dynamic components of emotional reactivity. In two studies involving five samples (total </span><em>N</em> = 631), participants were asked to continuously rate their emotional experiences in response to presented affective images. General cognitive ability, assessed, by proxy, with self-reported ACT scores, was linked to less intense peak reactions, peak reactions that were delayed, and/or to velocities of affect change that were less pronounced. Such relationships tended to be observed regardless of whether images were positive or negative. The findings provide support for dual process theorizing and suggest that general cognitive ability modulates dynamic components of emotional responding.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13862,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 101760"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289623000417","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Dual process theories often contrast a hot, reactive affective system with a cool, reflective cognitive system. The cognitive system permits rationality and reasoning, but may inhibit spontaneous affect. Such frameworks would seem to suggest that individual differences in general cognitive ability, which is linked to abstract forms of reasoning, may impact dynamic components of emotional reactivity. In two studies involving five samples (total N = 631), participants were asked to continuously rate their emotional experiences in response to presented affective images. General cognitive ability, assessed, by proxy, with self-reported ACT scores, was linked to less intense peak reactions, peak reactions that were delayed, and/or to velocities of affect change that were less pronounced. Such relationships tended to be observed regardless of whether images were positive or negative. The findings provide support for dual process theorizing and suggest that general cognitive ability modulates dynamic components of emotional responding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过自我报告的ACT分数评估的一般认知能力与情绪反应的减少有关:来自动态影响反应任务的证据
双过程理论经常将热的、反应性的情感系统与冷的、反思性的认知系统进行对比。认知系统允许理性和推理,但可能抑制自发的情感。这些框架似乎表明,与抽象推理形式相关的一般认知能力的个体差异可能会影响情绪反应的动态组成部分。在两项涉及5个样本(总N = 631)的研究中,参与者被要求对所呈现的情感图像进行持续的情感体验评分。一般认知能力,通过自我报告的ACT分数来评估,与较不强烈的峰值反应、延迟的峰值反应和/或不太明显的情感变化速度有关。无论图像是积极的还是消极的,都倾向于观察到这种关系。这一发现为双过程理论提供了支持,并表明一般认知能力调节情绪反应的动态成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligence
Intelligence PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: This unique journal in psychology is devoted to publishing original research and theoretical studies and review papers that substantially contribute to the understanding of intelligence. It provides a new source of significant papers in psychometrics, tests and measurement, and all other empirical and theoretical studies in intelligence and mental retardation.
期刊最新文献
A special contribution from spatial ability to math word problem solving: Evidence from structural equation modelling and network analysis Occupation-related differences in cognitive aging: Comparative effects of job type, skill level, and education Investigating measurement invariance of the IDS-2 intelligence scales between migrant and non-migrant groups Investment theory and tilt: Evidence from jobs and job families DNA and IQ: Big deal or much ado about nothing? – A meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1