Pension Reform in China

Birgitte Jensen
{"title":"Pension Reform in China","authors":"Birgitte Jensen","doi":"10.5278/JCIR.V7I1.3541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study addresses two questions: first regarding China’s ability to respond to its rapidly ageing population, and second what China can learn from Denmark in their approach to this challenge. Denmark, along with the other Scandinavian countries, is generally considered well adapted to demographic change. This paper aims to examine if the experiences of Denmark can add insights that are useful for the development of a sustainable and financially responsible approach to population ageing in China. Reviewing the respective demographic challenges of both China and Denmark, together with the provisions of old-age security and care, this paper presents an examination of their adaptability to demographic change. Finally, the paper outlines three factors from which China arguably could learn from the Danish approach to demographic change. It is evident from studying the Danish approach to demographic changes that pensions are not the sole focus; stimulating labour force participation, creating initiatives to postpone retirement and work longer and enforcing pro-natal polices are all part of the solution. Due to this, this paper argues that the main lesson to be learned from Denmark is that there is a need for a holistic approach to demographic change; reforming the pension system is only one part. \nKeywords: China, Denmark, universalism, demographic change, pensions, old-age dependency","PeriodicalId":37130,"journal":{"name":"Journal of China and International Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of China and International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5278/JCIR.V7I1.3541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study addresses two questions: first regarding China’s ability to respond to its rapidly ageing population, and second what China can learn from Denmark in their approach to this challenge. Denmark, along with the other Scandinavian countries, is generally considered well adapted to demographic change. This paper aims to examine if the experiences of Denmark can add insights that are useful for the development of a sustainable and financially responsible approach to population ageing in China. Reviewing the respective demographic challenges of both China and Denmark, together with the provisions of old-age security and care, this paper presents an examination of their adaptability to demographic change. Finally, the paper outlines three factors from which China arguably could learn from the Danish approach to demographic change. It is evident from studying the Danish approach to demographic changes that pensions are not the sole focus; stimulating labour force participation, creating initiatives to postpone retirement and work longer and enforcing pro-natal polices are all part of the solution. Due to this, this paper argues that the main lesson to be learned from Denmark is that there is a need for a holistic approach to demographic change; reforming the pension system is only one part. Keywords: China, Denmark, universalism, demographic change, pensions, old-age dependency
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国养老金改革
这项研究解决了两个问题:第一,关于中国应对快速老龄化人口的能力,第二,中国可以从丹麦应对这一挑战的方法中学到什么。丹麦和其他斯堪的纳维亚国家一样,通常被认为很好地适应了人口变化。本文旨在考察丹麦的经验是否可以为中国制定可持续和财政负责任的人口老龄化方法提供有益的见解。本文回顾了中国和丹麦各自面临的人口挑战,以及养老保障和护理的规定,考察了它们对人口变化的适应性。最后,本文概述了三个因素,中国可以从中学习丹麦应对人口变化的方法。从研究丹麦应对人口变化的方法中可以明显看出,养老金并不是唯一的重点;刺激劳动力参与、制定推迟退休和延长工作时间的举措以及执行产前政策都是解决方案的一部分。因此,本文认为,从丹麦汲取的主要教训是,需要对人口变化采取全面的方法;养老金制度改革只是其中的一部分。关键词:中国,丹麦,普遍主义,人口变化,养老金,养老依赖
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of China and International Relations
Journal of China and International Relations Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
New Perspectives on the BRICS Countries Belt and Road Initiative and China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: Geopolitical Challenges. Brazil and China Interests in Atlantic Africa: Convergences, Divergences and Opportunities for Cooperation Inside the BRICS Forum Framework Russia, BRICS and Cyber Power: International Relations Theory and the BRICS Phenomenon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1