Personal attitudes and denialist views about the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: a national survey

Q2 Arts and Humanities Medicina e Morale Pub Date : 2022-07-07 DOI:10.4081/mem.2022.1204
A. Sisto, Livia Quintiliani, F. Vicinanza, S. Fabris, L. Campanozzi, G. Curcio, M. Michilli, A. Molina, G. Ghilardi, Andrea Manazza, G. Lauri, Rocco Gentile, A. Perciaccante, F. De Micco, L. Navarini, Lourdes Velázquez, M. Picozzi, G. Ricci, Flora Piacquadio, Melissa Maioni, Fabio Ermili, Mario Tambone, G. Chelucci, M. Ciccozzi, V. Tambone
{"title":"Personal attitudes and denialist views about the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: a national survey","authors":"A. Sisto, Livia Quintiliani, F. Vicinanza, S. Fabris, L. Campanozzi, G. Curcio, M. Michilli, A. Molina, G. Ghilardi, Andrea Manazza, G. Lauri, Rocco Gentile, A. Perciaccante, F. De Micco, L. Navarini, Lourdes Velázquez, M. Picozzi, G. Ricci, Flora Piacquadio, Melissa Maioni, Fabio Ermili, Mario Tambone, G. Chelucci, M. Ciccozzi, V. Tambone","doi":"10.4081/mem.2022.1204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since COVID-19 began to spread, hypotheses about the possible causes of the disease and its treatment have increased worldwide, engenedering fears and concerns. This context of uncertainty, as well as the great changes that people were forced to accept in their daily lives, have challenged the general population, affecting public opinion and collective imagination inevitably, with also a negative impact on compliance with public health policies. This study explored the personal attitudes towards the COVID-19 pandemic and their association with denial stances in the Italian context. The aim was to address the relevance of these phenomena and in what guise they are present in relation to the grounds supporting them, as an avenue to be more effective in public health under different domains. An online questionnaires was set out to survey the general population over 18 throughout the Italian country, including students and health professionals, to offer geographic and professional diversity. General population was also stratified based on their direct or indirect experience of COVID-19, whilst health participants were recruited with regard to their involvement in a COVID centre. A total of 2110 questionnaire were filled out between December 2020 and April 2021. Of the participants, 85.45% completely disagree with the possibility that COVID-19 is not real and that the cultural, social and economic system wanted us to believe otherwise, whereas 69% had doubts about what has been claimed to date about the existence of COVID-19. Trust in institutions and types of COVID-19 experience affected these beliefs. The results also show that stress, anxiety, sadness, and vulnerability increased as compared to the pre-COVID- 19 pandemic timeframe. The fundings of this national survey revealed how much behaviors based on social responsibility and rational prudence are important for defensing human life.","PeriodicalId":36708,"journal":{"name":"Medicina e Morale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina e Morale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2022.1204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since COVID-19 began to spread, hypotheses about the possible causes of the disease and its treatment have increased worldwide, engenedering fears and concerns. This context of uncertainty, as well as the great changes that people were forced to accept in their daily lives, have challenged the general population, affecting public opinion and collective imagination inevitably, with also a negative impact on compliance with public health policies. This study explored the personal attitudes towards the COVID-19 pandemic and their association with denial stances in the Italian context. The aim was to address the relevance of these phenomena and in what guise they are present in relation to the grounds supporting them, as an avenue to be more effective in public health under different domains. An online questionnaires was set out to survey the general population over 18 throughout the Italian country, including students and health professionals, to offer geographic and professional diversity. General population was also stratified based on their direct or indirect experience of COVID-19, whilst health participants were recruited with regard to their involvement in a COVID centre. A total of 2110 questionnaire were filled out between December 2020 and April 2021. Of the participants, 85.45% completely disagree with the possibility that COVID-19 is not real and that the cultural, social and economic system wanted us to believe otherwise, whereas 69% had doubts about what has been claimed to date about the existence of COVID-19. Trust in institutions and types of COVID-19 experience affected these beliefs. The results also show that stress, anxiety, sadness, and vulnerability increased as compared to the pre-COVID- 19 pandemic timeframe. The fundings of this national survey revealed how much behaviors based on social responsibility and rational prudence are important for defensing human life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利对COVID-19大流行的个人态度和否认主义观点:一项全国性调查
自从新冠肺炎开始传播以来,关于该疾病可能病因及其治疗方法的假说在全球范围内不断增加,引发了恐惧和担忧。这种不确定性的背景,以及人们在日常生活中被迫接受的巨大变化,对普通民众构成了挑战,不可避免地影响了公众舆论和集体想象力,也对遵守公共卫生政策产生了负面影响。本研究探讨了在意大利背景下,个人对新冠肺炎大流行的态度及其与否认立场的关系。其目的是解决这些现象的相关性,以及它们以何种形式存在,与支持它们的理由有关,以此作为在不同领域的公共卫生中更有效的途径。制定了一份在线问卷,调查意大利全国18岁以上的普通人群,包括学生和卫生专业人员,以提供地理和职业多样性。普通人群也根据他们对新冠肺炎的直接或间接经历进行分层,而健康参与者则根据他们在新冠肺炎中心的参与情况进行招募。在2020年12月至2021年4月期间,共填写了2110份问卷。在参与者中,85.45%的人完全不同意新冠肺炎不是真实的,文化、社会和经济体系希望我们相信其他情况,而69%的人对迄今为止关于新冠肺炎存在的说法表示怀疑。对机构和新冠肺炎经历类型的信任影响了这些信念。研究结果还显示,与COVID-19大流行前相比,压力、焦虑、悲伤和脆弱性增加。这项全国性调查的基础揭示了基于社会责任和理性谨慎的行为在多大程度上对保护人类生命至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina e Morale
Medicina e Morale Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Contragestation or hidden abortion Consent in the psychotherapy setting Protection of animal welfare and regulation of animal experimentation Antiandrogens in the treatment of violent sexual behavior: ethical reflections Continuing care unit: new therapeutic and care solution in terminal illness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1