TIC e inteligencia artificial en la revisión del proceso de escritura: su uso en las universidades públicas valencianas

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives-REALIA Pub Date : 2022-01-15 DOI:10.7203/realia.28.20622
Beatriz Martín Marchante
{"title":"TIC e inteligencia artificial en la revisión del proceso de escritura: su uso en las universidades públicas valencianas","authors":"Beatriz Martín Marchante","doi":"10.7203/realia.28.20622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the outset the incorporation of ICT and artificial intelligence (AI) in the education field generated a social debate that is still ongoing. One of the most controversial aspects was the introduction of intelligent tutoring and online learning systems. In 2016, the Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030report predicted that these systems would become the norm in classrooms in just fifteen years. Five years since the publication of that report, we need to know the current state of the art. One aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the teacher-recommended use of ICT and artificial intelligence in the writing process and how this technology is actually used by students. Another aim is to determine what type of automated assessment and corrective feedback is applied by teachers and what perception both groups have about the use of ICT and AI. To conduct this study, we designed two ad hoc questionnaires, which were completed by 53 professors and 101 students from the Polytechnic University of Valencia (UPV) and the University of Valencia (UV). One result from this research is that while 79% of teachers recommend using ICT, only 61.4% of students follow this recommendation. One conclusion we can draw is that ICT and AI have not yet been fully integrated into language teaching and learning. At the same time, most participants in this study admit that they do not take full advantage of this technology.","PeriodicalId":40166,"journal":{"name":"Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives-REALIA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Education and Learning Innovation Archives-REALIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/realia.28.20622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

From the outset the incorporation of ICT and artificial intelligence (AI) in the education field generated a social debate that is still ongoing. One of the most controversial aspects was the introduction of intelligent tutoring and online learning systems. In 2016, the Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030report predicted that these systems would become the norm in classrooms in just fifteen years. Five years since the publication of that report, we need to know the current state of the art. One aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the teacher-recommended use of ICT and artificial intelligence in the writing process and how this technology is actually used by students. Another aim is to determine what type of automated assessment and corrective feedback is applied by teachers and what perception both groups have about the use of ICT and AI. To conduct this study, we designed two ad hoc questionnaires, which were completed by 53 professors and 101 students from the Polytechnic University of Valencia (UPV) and the University of Valencia (UV). One result from this research is that while 79% of teachers recommend using ICT, only 61.4% of students follow this recommendation. One conclusion we can draw is that ICT and AI have not yet been fully integrated into language teaching and learning. At the same time, most participants in this study admit that they do not take full advantage of this technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ict和人工智能在写作过程回顾中的应用:瓦伦西亚公立大学
从一开始,ICT和人工智能(AI)在教育领域的结合就引发了一场至今仍在进行的社会辩论。最具争议的一个方面是智能辅导和在线学习系统的引入。2016年,《2030年人工智能与生活》报告预测,这些系统将在短短15年内成为教室的标准。自那份报告发表五年以来,我们需要了解目前的技术状况。本研究的目的之一是调查教师建议在写作过程中使用ICT和人工智能之间的关系,以及学生如何实际使用这项技术。另一个目标是确定教师采用哪种类型的自动评估和纠正反馈,以及两组对ICT和AI的使用有什么看法。为了进行这项研究,我们设计了两份特别问卷,分别由瓦伦西亚理工大学(UPV)和瓦伦西亚大学(UV)的53名教授和101名学生完成。这项研究的一个结果是,虽然79%的教师建议使用ICT,但只有61.4%的学生遵循这一建议。我们可以得出的一个结论是,信息通信技术和人工智能尚未完全融入语言教学。与此同时,这项研究的大多数参与者承认他们没有充分利用这项技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reducing Underachievement and Promoting Critical Thinking Skills in Computer Studies Through a Culturally Sensitive Instructional Method El tratamiento de las lenguas adicionales en el Proyecto Lingüístico de Centro: TILC y AICLE a revisión en el contexto valenciano Learner analytics: Hindsight evaluation at course-level Exploring the Positive Experiences of Senior High School Teachers in Teaching the Sports Track during the K-12 Transition Years in Southern Philippines Implicación y afectividad en el ejercicio profesional del Trabajo Social y la Educación Social
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1