Responsabilidade civil e sustentabilidade: normatividade em prol do meio ambiente

A. C. F. Amaral, P. Riccetto
{"title":"Responsabilidade civil e sustentabilidade: normatividade em prol do meio ambiente","authors":"A. C. F. Amaral, P. Riccetto","doi":"10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N75P105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"portugueshttp://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p105Este artigo analisa o carater indissociavel da responsabilidade civil e da sustentabilidade a partir dos novos paradigmas de ressarcimento, tecendo criticas ao sistema classico de compensacao, insuficiente para a promocao da justica ambiental. Ancorado no metodo hipotetico-dedutivo, assevera-se o carater normativo da responsabilidade civil, que passa a apresentar, implicitamente, funcao regulatoria de condutas, sob a rubrica de dano moral generico. Demonstra-se, ao fim, que o atual paradigma de responsabilizacao, provido de funcao exclusivamente ressarcitoria, nao apresenta grau satisfatorio de protecao ao Meio Ambiente. Englishhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p105It analyzes the inseparable character of civil responsibility and sustainability from the new reimbursement paradigms in Brazilian law, criticizing the classical system of compensation, appointed as insufficient to the effective promotion of environmental justice. Sustained by the hypothetical-deductive method, it affirms the normative nature of the liability, that starts to present normative function, albeit in a veiled way, always under the rubric of generic moral damage. It shows, in order, that the current liability paradigm, provided exclusively by compensatory function, does not present a satisfactory degree of protection to the environment.","PeriodicalId":30170,"journal":{"name":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","volume":"38 1","pages":"105-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N75P105","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017V38N75P105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

portugueshttp://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p105Este artigo analisa o carater indissociavel da responsabilidade civil e da sustentabilidade a partir dos novos paradigmas de ressarcimento, tecendo criticas ao sistema classico de compensacao, insuficiente para a promocao da justica ambiental. Ancorado no metodo hipotetico-dedutivo, assevera-se o carater normativo da responsabilidade civil, que passa a apresentar, implicitamente, funcao regulatoria de condutas, sob a rubrica de dano moral generico. Demonstra-se, ao fim, que o atual paradigma de responsabilizacao, provido de funcao exclusivamente ressarcitoria, nao apresenta grau satisfatorio de protecao ao Meio Ambiente. Englishhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p105It analyzes the inseparable character of civil responsibility and sustainability from the new reimbursement paradigms in Brazilian law, criticizing the classical system of compensation, appointed as insufficient to the effective promotion of environmental justice. Sustained by the hypothetical-deductive method, it affirms the normative nature of the liability, that starts to present normative function, albeit in a veiled way, always under the rubric of generic moral damage. It shows, in order, that the current liability paradigm, provided exclusively by compensatory function, does not present a satisfactory degree of protection to the environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民事责任与可持续性:有利于环境的规范
本文从赔偿的新范式出发,分析了民事责任与可持续性不可分割的特征,对传统赔偿制度提出了批评,认为传统赔偿制度不足以促进环境正义。在假设-演绎方法的基础上,确立了民事责任的规范特征,在一般道德损害的标题下含蓄地呈现了行为的监管功能。最后,本文表明,目前的问责范式只提供赔偿功能,对环境的保护程度并不令人满意。Englishhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2017v38n75p105It分析了巴西法律中新的赔偿模式的民事责任和可持续性的不可分割特征,批评了传统的赔偿制度,认为这不足以有效促进环境正义。在假设-演绎方法的支持下,它肯定了责任的规范性性质,它开始于目前的规范性功能,尽管以一种谨慎的方式,总是在一般道德损害的标题下。它指出,目前的责任模式完全由补偿功能提供,并没有提供令人满意的环境保护程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Justice and equality for all? Proportional representation in Belgium and France (1883-1921) A interligação entre a Lei Anticorrupção e o Direito dos Desastres Controle de Integridade e Administração Pública: sinergias necessárias As soluções traçadas no Ordenamento Jurídico Português para o problema do lucro da intervenção Post-Modern Narratives and the Paradigm of Efficiency: participatory democracy on the yellow brick road
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1