Measuring the quality of workplace learning environments – a qualitative meta synthesis of employee questionnaires

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Workplace Learning Pub Date : 2023-03-21 DOI:10.1108/jwl-06-2022-0074
V. Deutscher, A. Braunstein
{"title":"Measuring the quality of workplace learning environments – a qualitative meta synthesis of employee questionnaires","authors":"V. Deutscher, A. Braunstein","doi":"10.1108/jwl-06-2022-0074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to support researchers and practitioners in finding suitable instruments for future research studies and organizational quality assessments.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nEmployees’ success of learning at work is strongly influenced by the quality of the workplace learning environment. In the recent decades growing effort has been given to the development of surveys to measure the quality of workplace learning, resulting in a large number of available survey instruments. This study conceptually draws on a 3-P model and uses a qualitative metasynthesis to collect and categorize n = 94 surveys that intend to measure the quality of workplace learning (WPL).\n\n\nFindings\nThe results underline that research on WPL environments is a highly interdisciplinary endeavor, where every discipline enriches the field by a new perspective and own foci. Overall, this study finds a focus on learning culture and working conditions, on social and functional inclusion of the learner and on support and feedback during training. Products of WPL such as professional competences or career aspirations play a minor role.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nWith the integration of quality measurement instruments from various research studies, this study produces an interactive online instrument map that gives a broad, yet organized overview of available quality measures in the WPL field.\n","PeriodicalId":47077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Workplace Learning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Workplace Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-06-2022-0074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to support researchers and practitioners in finding suitable instruments for future research studies and organizational quality assessments. Design/methodology/approach Employees’ success of learning at work is strongly influenced by the quality of the workplace learning environment. In the recent decades growing effort has been given to the development of surveys to measure the quality of workplace learning, resulting in a large number of available survey instruments. This study conceptually draws on a 3-P model and uses a qualitative metasynthesis to collect and categorize n = 94 surveys that intend to measure the quality of workplace learning (WPL). Findings The results underline that research on WPL environments is a highly interdisciplinary endeavor, where every discipline enriches the field by a new perspective and own foci. Overall, this study finds a focus on learning culture and working conditions, on social and functional inclusion of the learner and on support and feedback during training. Products of WPL such as professional competences or career aspirations play a minor role. Originality/value With the integration of quality measurement instruments from various research studies, this study produces an interactive online instrument map that gives a broad, yet organized overview of available quality measures in the WPL field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量工作场所学习环境的质量——对员工问卷的定性综合
目的本研究旨在协助研究人员与实务人员寻找适合未来研究与组织品质评估的工具。设计/方法/方法员工在工作中学习的成功受到工作场所学习环境质量的强烈影响。在最近几十年里,人们越来越努力地发展调查,以衡量工作场所学习的质量,从而产生了大量可用的调查工具。本研究从概念上借鉴了3-P模型,并使用定性元合成来收集和分类n = 94项旨在衡量工作场所学习质量(WPL)的调查。研究结果表明,WPL环境的研究是一项高度跨学科的努力,每个学科都通过新的视角和自己的焦点丰富了该领域。总的来说,本研究发现了学习文化和工作条件、学习者的社会和功能包容以及培训期间的支持和反馈的重点。WPL的产品,如专业能力或职业抱负发挥次要作用。原创性/价值本研究整合了来自各种研究的质量测量仪器,生成了一个交互式在线仪器地图,该地图对WPL领域中可用的质量测量方法进行了广泛而有组织的概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Workplace Learning
Journal of Workplace Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The Journal of Workplace Learning aims to provide an avenue for the presentation and discussion of research related to the workplace as a site for learning. Its scope encompasses formal, informal and incidental learning in the workplace for individuals, groups and teams, as well as work-based learning, and off-the-job learning for the workplace. This focus on learning in, from and for the workplace also brings with it questions about the nature of interventions that might assist the learning process and of the roles of those responsible directly or indirectly for such interventions. Since workplace learning cannot be considered without reference to its context, another aim of the journal is to explore the organisational, policy, political, resource issues and other factors which influence how, when and why that learning takes place.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing learning organizations through employee resilience: Investigating the mediating influence of psychological empowerment Learning organization culture and knowledge sharing: the mediating role of social capital How do care workers learn to care for people with dementia living in care homes? A model of informal learning A catalyst for activation against racism: case study on effectiveness of workplace equity, inclusion and diversity conversations Using SIM-TLX to investigate the potential impacts on cognitive load while undertaking tasks in a virtual workplace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1