Evaluation of Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Leg Wounds: Can Platelet-rich Plasma Therapy Help?

Domantas Rainys, Adas Cepas, R. Rimdeika
{"title":"Evaluation of Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Leg Wounds: Can Platelet-rich Plasma Therapy Help?","authors":"Domantas Rainys, Adas Cepas, R. Rimdeika","doi":"10.15388/lietchirur.2020.19.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the quality of life (QoL) using platelet-rich plasma gel (PRP) and conventional treatment of chronic leg wounds. Methods. Randomized clinical trial was carried out in Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics during 2014–2018. Patients (n = 69) included in the study were randomly grouped into 2 groups: 1) PRP, 2) Control. SF-36 questionnaire was used to evaluate QoL, visual analog scale was used to evaluate persistent pain associated with ulcer and wound exudate volume was also evaluated. Statistical analysis were performed with SPSS 23.0 package. Results. Patients in PRP group at the end of the treatment rated their QoL over control group patients (p < 0.05). Wound associated pain (PRP – 1.54; control – 2.85; p = 0.015) and pain associated sleep disturbance (p < 0.001) was lower in PRP group patients. Wound exudate volume was lower in PRP group patients at the end of the treatment (p < 0.05). Conclusion. The treatment with PRP is associated with less wound associated pain, less-common sleep disturbance, reduced wound secretion and improved quality of life compared to conventional treatment.","PeriodicalId":52926,"journal":{"name":"Lietuvos Chirurgija","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lietuvos Chirurgija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/lietchirur.2020.19.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the quality of life (QoL) using platelet-rich plasma gel (PRP) and conventional treatment of chronic leg wounds. Methods. Randomized clinical trial was carried out in Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics during 2014–2018. Patients (n = 69) included in the study were randomly grouped into 2 groups: 1) PRP, 2) Control. SF-36 questionnaire was used to evaluate QoL, visual analog scale was used to evaluate persistent pain associated with ulcer and wound exudate volume was also evaluated. Statistical analysis were performed with SPSS 23.0 package. Results. Patients in PRP group at the end of the treatment rated their QoL over control group patients (p < 0.05). Wound associated pain (PRP – 1.54; control – 2.85; p = 0.015) and pain associated sleep disturbance (p < 0.001) was lower in PRP group patients. Wound exudate volume was lower in PRP group patients at the end of the treatment (p < 0.05). Conclusion. The treatment with PRP is associated with less wound associated pain, less-common sleep disturbance, reduced wound secretion and improved quality of life compared to conventional treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性腿部创伤患者的生活质量评价:富血小板血浆治疗有帮助吗?
的目标。该研究的目的是评估和比较使用富血小板血浆凝胶(PRP)和常规治疗慢性腿部伤口的生活质量(QoL)。方法。2014-2018年在立陶宛卫生科学大学考纳斯诊所医院进行随机临床试验。纳入研究的患者(n = 69)随机分为2组:1)PRP组,2)对照组。采用SF-36问卷评估患者的生活质量,采用视觉模拟量表评估与溃疡相关的持续性疼痛,并评估创面渗出液量。采用SPSS 23.0软件包进行统计学分析。结果。治疗结束时,PRP组患者的生活质量评分高于对照组(p < 0.05)。伤口相关疼痛(PRP - 1.54;控制- 2.85;p = 0.015), PRP组患者疼痛相关睡眠障碍(p < 0.001)较低。PRP组患者治疗结束时创面渗出液量明显低于对照组(p < 0.05)。结论。与常规治疗相比,PRP治疗可减少伤口相关疼痛,减少常见的睡眠障碍,减少伤口分泌并改善生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Colon Cancer Genetic and Epigenetic Changes, Etiopathogenesis, Risk Factors, Treatment: Literature Review The Impact of an Educational 3D Virtual Reality Video Method on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: First Results Correction of Constricted Ear – Case Report Incarcereted Epigastric Hernia with Liver Content: a Case Report Giant Gallstones – a Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1