Reimagining the Imaginaries: Towards a Biocultural Theory of (Non)religion

M. Ovsepyan
{"title":"Reimagining the Imaginaries: Towards a Biocultural Theory of (Non)religion","authors":"M. Ovsepyan","doi":"10.1558/jcsr.37524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A number of scholars of nonreligion and secularity have argued in recent years for the need to get beyond the neat binaries and the negative identities signaled by atheism and agnosticism (e.g. Taves et al. 2018). However, these binaries are deeply ingrained in the landscape of ideas that have shaped the way we do scholarship. I will explore the Enlightenment sense of \"excarnation\" found in the CSR approaches to (non)religion, and will discuss what has contributed to it being \"too much mind, and not enough brain, body, and culture,\" as Armin Geertz (2010) sums it up. Charles Taylor in his seminal work A Secular Age (2007) makes a famous case against the \"subtraction stories\" expressed in the popular narrative as a mere reduction of religious belief. Taylor's interpretation involves the radical transformation of the social imaginaries that shape the way we conceptualize the world we inhabit. Conceptualizing imaginaries as a way of collective production of sense offers a helpful way of engaging with the question of how differently historied bodies come to experience and engage with the world in different ways, and leads to the possibility of thinking about the role imaginaries play in religious experience. In this essay, I will argue for the use of the social imaginaries as a conceptual tool that contributes to our understanding of local theories of mind, offers a helpful contribution to the biocultural theory of (non)religion and functions as a bridge between its cognitive and affective elements.","PeriodicalId":29718,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.37524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A number of scholars of nonreligion and secularity have argued in recent years for the need to get beyond the neat binaries and the negative identities signaled by atheism and agnosticism (e.g. Taves et al. 2018). However, these binaries are deeply ingrained in the landscape of ideas that have shaped the way we do scholarship. I will explore the Enlightenment sense of "excarnation" found in the CSR approaches to (non)religion, and will discuss what has contributed to it being "too much mind, and not enough brain, body, and culture," as Armin Geertz (2010) sums it up. Charles Taylor in his seminal work A Secular Age (2007) makes a famous case against the "subtraction stories" expressed in the popular narrative as a mere reduction of religious belief. Taylor's interpretation involves the radical transformation of the social imaginaries that shape the way we conceptualize the world we inhabit. Conceptualizing imaginaries as a way of collective production of sense offers a helpful way of engaging with the question of how differently historied bodies come to experience and engage with the world in different ways, and leads to the possibility of thinking about the role imaginaries play in religious experience. In this essay, I will argue for the use of the social imaginaries as a conceptual tool that contributes to our understanding of local theories of mind, offers a helpful contribution to the biocultural theory of (non)religion and functions as a bridge between its cognitive and affective elements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新想象想象:走向(非)宗教的生物文化理论
近年来,许多非宗教性和世俗性的学者认为,有必要超越无神论和不可知论所暗示的纯粹的二元性和负面身份(例如,Taves等人,2018)。然而,这些二元性在塑造我们学术方式的思想景观中根深蒂固。我将探索在CSR对(非)宗教的方法中发现的启蒙意义上的“外学习”,并将讨论是什么导致了它“太多的思想,而没有足够的大脑、身体和文化”,正如Armin Geertz(2010)所总结的那样。查尔斯·泰勒在其开创性作品《世俗时代》(2007)中提出了一个著名的案例,反对流行叙事中表达的“减法故事”仅仅是对宗教信仰的减少。泰勒的解释涉及社会想象的根本转变,这些社会想象塑造了我们对我们所居住的世界的概念化方式。将想象概念化为一种集体产生意义的方式,提供了一种有益的方式来处理不同历史的身体如何以不同的方式体验和参与世界的问题,并带来了思考想象在宗教体验中所扮演角色的可能性。在这篇文章中,我将主张使用社会想象作为一种概念工具,有助于我们理解当地的心理理论,为(非)宗教的生物文化理论提供有益的贡献,并作为其认知和情感元素之间的桥梁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vastness as an Embodied Representation of Existential Concepts Embodiment, Deity Yoga, Cognitive and Evolutionary Approaches to Religion Beyond Heaven and Earth: A Cognitive Theory of Religion, by Gabriel Levy Raising the Buddha’s Hand Religion Devolving?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1