Integrating national culture into the organizational performance feedback theory

IF 7.5 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS European Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2023.01.003
Serhan Kotiloglu , Daniela Blettner , Thomas G. Lechler
{"title":"Integrating national culture into the organizational performance feedback theory","authors":"Serhan Kotiloglu ,&nbsp;Daniela Blettner ,&nbsp;Thomas G. Lechler","doi":"10.1016/j.emj.2023.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The organizational response to performance feedback is a collective process in which groups of decision-makers face uncertainty about the future when making organizational decisions based on past performance feedback. Culture is an important variable to explain the context of collective decision processes, but it is not well understood by Organizational Performance Feedback Theory (PFT) research. The current internationalization trend of PFT research poses the question if empirical results are comparable across different cultural settings, and whether culture is a general condition of organizational performance feedback. We analyze the role of national culture as a proxy for collective interpretive processes that influence the organizational decision-making process in response to performance feedback, and we resolve some of the unexplained variances in the empirical results. We use a meta-analysis to understand if national culture poses a general condition for the organizational performance feedback process. We analyze the empirical results of 153 PFT studies covering organizations from 16 countries, and we examine the impact of four dimensions of national culture: uncertainty avoidance, performance orientation, future orientation, and institutional collectivism. We demonstrate that national culture is an important concept for PFT development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48290,"journal":{"name":"European Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237323000038/pdfft?md5=4e5ad6a95a2ed8fb175cd7bb40c7988f&pid=1-s2.0-S0263237323000038-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237323000038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The organizational response to performance feedback is a collective process in which groups of decision-makers face uncertainty about the future when making organizational decisions based on past performance feedback. Culture is an important variable to explain the context of collective decision processes, but it is not well understood by Organizational Performance Feedback Theory (PFT) research. The current internationalization trend of PFT research poses the question if empirical results are comparable across different cultural settings, and whether culture is a general condition of organizational performance feedback. We analyze the role of national culture as a proxy for collective interpretive processes that influence the organizational decision-making process in response to performance feedback, and we resolve some of the unexplained variances in the empirical results. We use a meta-analysis to understand if national culture poses a general condition for the organizational performance feedback process. We analyze the empirical results of 153 PFT studies covering organizations from 16 countries, and we examine the impact of four dimensions of national culture: uncertainty avoidance, performance orientation, future orientation, and institutional collectivism. We demonstrate that national culture is an important concept for PFT development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将民族文化融入组织绩效反馈理论
组织对绩效反馈的反应是一个集体过程,在这一过程中,决策者群体在根据过去的绩效反馈做出组织决策时,面临着对未来的不确定性。文化是解释集体决策过程背景的一个重要变量,但组织绩效反馈理论(PFT)研究对文化的理解并不透彻。当前 PFT 研究的国际化趋势提出了一个问题:不同文化背景下的实证结果是否具有可比性,以及文化是否是组织绩效反馈的一般条件。我们分析了民族文化作为集体解释过程的替代物在影响组织绩效反馈决策过程中的作用,并解决了实证结果中一些无法解释的差异。我们通过荟萃分析来了解民族文化是否构成组织绩效反馈过程的一般条件。我们分析了来自 16 个国家的 153 项 PFT 研究的实证结果,并考察了民族文化的四个维度:不确定性规避、绩效导向、未来导向和制度集体主义的影响。我们证明,民族文化是 PFT 发展的一个重要概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The European Management Journal (EMJ) stands as a premier scholarly publication, disseminating cutting-edge research spanning all realms of management. EMJ articles challenge conventional wisdom through rigorously informed empirical and theoretical inquiries, offering fresh insights and innovative perspectives on key management themes while remaining accessible and engaging for a wide readership. EMJ articles embody intellectual curiosity and embrace diverse methodological approaches, yielding contributions that significantly influence both management theory and practice. We actively seek interdisciplinary research that integrates distinct research traditions to illuminate contemporary challenges within the expansive domain of European business and management. We strongly encourage cross-cultural investigations addressing the unique challenges faced by European management scholarship and practice in navigating global issues and contexts.
期刊最新文献
Management team categories, social network characteristics, and corporate credit risk From pursuit of self-interest to pursuit of happiness: Complementary or contradictory readings of “wealth of nations” and “theory of moral sentiments”? Moral sentiments and sustainable finance: A proposal for new market segmentation The role of focal leaders in collective leadership behavior: A historiometric analysis of socialized and personalized leaders The impartial spectator and the pursuit of interest in commercial society: A dual-text reading of Adam Smith for contemporary business and management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1