AL IHTILAF AL-FIQHI WA TAUDZIF FI QADHAYA MA`ASHIRA

Mahroof Athambawa
{"title":"AL IHTILAF AL-FIQHI WA TAUDZIF FI QADHAYA MA`ASHIRA","authors":"Mahroof Athambawa","doi":"10.22515/ISLIMUS.V4I2.2101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research  Paper Studies the issue of \"jurisprudence differences\" and ways of Employing them in contemporary issues, which is an important issue in the present day, Because There  are People such as Orientalists and Prejudiced who view the reality of jurisprudence differences as a gap that defects the structure of Islamic jurisprudence and then come to the conclusion that it is merely comprising  a group of human thoughts and not a living revelation from Almighty God as it is believed ,However, the reality that should not be forgotten by the Thinker who is free from intellectual biased precedents, that the jurisprudential differences arising from the derivation of the scholars who had profound knowledge with the sincerity of religious commitment and Devotion to God is the Outcome of approach intended By Allah and used to Derive  Islamic Judgments from the Quran and the Sunnah. Jurisprudential differences are a function established  by the god for the scholars  in order to take care of the interests of the people and fulfill their innate needs, but the question arises what are the best approaches to take advantage of this rich scientific heritage in our contemporary issues, this  research provides a detailed treatment of this issue and lead to the results that can be utilized in the development of jurisprudential work in the present day.","PeriodicalId":56239,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Islamic Literature and Muslim Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Islamic Literature and Muslim Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22515/ISLIMUS.V4I2.2101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research  Paper Studies the issue of "jurisprudence differences" and ways of Employing them in contemporary issues, which is an important issue in the present day, Because There  are People such as Orientalists and Prejudiced who view the reality of jurisprudence differences as a gap that defects the structure of Islamic jurisprudence and then come to the conclusion that it is merely comprising  a group of human thoughts and not a living revelation from Almighty God as it is believed ,However, the reality that should not be forgotten by the Thinker who is free from intellectual biased precedents, that the jurisprudential differences arising from the derivation of the scholars who had profound knowledge with the sincerity of religious commitment and Devotion to God is the Outcome of approach intended By Allah and used to Derive  Islamic Judgments from the Quran and the Sunnah. Jurisprudential differences are a function established  by the god for the scholars  in order to take care of the interests of the people and fulfill their innate needs, but the question arises what are the best approaches to take advantage of this rich scientific heritage in our contemporary issues, this  research provides a detailed treatment of this issue and lead to the results that can be utilized in the development of jurisprudential work in the present day.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本文研究的是“法理差异”问题及其在当代问题中的运用方式,这是当今社会的一个重要问题。因为有一些人,如东方主义者和偏见者,他们把法学差异的现实看作是一个缺陷伊斯兰法学结构的鸿沟,然后得出结论,它只是由一组人类思想组成,而不是像他们所认为的那样是全能的上帝的活生生的启示。然而,不受智力偏见先例影响的思想家不应该忘记的现实。学者们对宗教的忠诚和虔诚有着深刻的认识,由此产生的法理上的差异是安拉意图的结果,并被用来从《古兰经》和《圣训》中推导出伊斯兰教的判决。法律学上的差异是一个函数建立的神学者为了照顾人民的利益和满足他们天生的需求,但问题是什么是最好的方法来利用这一丰富的科学遗产在当代的问题,这个问题的研究提供了一个详细的治疗,导致的结果可以利用发展的法理在今天的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Psychoanalytic Approach and Dreams Interpretation in Surah Yusuf Jamalat al-Khat al-Arabi wal-Takwinat al-Khatiyah fi Kiswat al-Ka'bah al-Musharrafah: Dirasah Faniyah Tahliliyah Narrative Imagination of Islam in Nusantara: A Study on Islam in Babad Tanah Jawi and Babad Giyanti The Veil: A Phenomenon of Urban Society and Religious Identity Qur’anic Revelation: The Comparison between the Methods of Tafsir and Fiqh in its Interpretation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1