The economics of climate change with endogenous preferences

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Resource and Energy Economics Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101312
Linus Mattauch , Cameron Hepburn , Fiona Spuler , Nicholas Stern
{"title":"The economics of climate change with endogenous preferences","authors":"Linus Mattauch ,&nbsp;Cameron Hepburn ,&nbsp;Fiona Spuler ,&nbsp;Nicholas Stern","doi":"10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Avoiding unmanageable climate change implies that global greenhouse gas emissions<span> must be reduced rapidly. Carbon prices and technological development are essential to deliver such reductions. Changes in preferences, however, are rarely considered, even though other major socioeconomic transitions – such as those from reducing smoking and drink-driving – have succeeded partly because preferences have changed. This article examines the impact of climate policy-induced changes in consumers’ preferences. We show that low-carbon policies could be better designed if it is recognised that preferences can be endogenous to such policies. For instance, carbon taxes must be adjusted, if they crowd-in or -out social preferences, to achieve a given target. Further, when the urban built environment changes mobility preferences, the value of low-carbon infrastructure investments can be underestimated if such effects are ignored. Third, policy-induced changes in preferences for active travel and plant-based diets could increase the net benefits of the transition to zero emissions.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":47952,"journal":{"name":"Resource and Energy Economics","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 101312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resource and Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092876552200029X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Avoiding unmanageable climate change implies that global greenhouse gas emissions must be reduced rapidly. Carbon prices and technological development are essential to deliver such reductions. Changes in preferences, however, are rarely considered, even though other major socioeconomic transitions – such as those from reducing smoking and drink-driving – have succeeded partly because preferences have changed. This article examines the impact of climate policy-induced changes in consumers’ preferences. We show that low-carbon policies could be better designed if it is recognised that preferences can be endogenous to such policies. For instance, carbon taxes must be adjusted, if they crowd-in or -out social preferences, to achieve a given target. Further, when the urban built environment changes mobility preferences, the value of low-carbon infrastructure investments can be underestimated if such effects are ignored. Third, policy-induced changes in preferences for active travel and plant-based diets could increase the net benefits of the transition to zero emissions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有内生偏好的气候变化经济学
避免难以控制的气候变化意味着必须迅速减少全球温室气体排放。碳价格和技术发展对实现这种减排至关重要。然而,偏好的变化很少被考虑在内,尽管其他主要的社会经济转型——比如减少吸烟和酒驾——的成功部分是因为偏好的改变。本文考察了气候政策引起的消费者偏好变化的影响。我们表明,如果认识到偏好可以内生于低碳政策,就可以更好地设计低碳政策。例如,如果碳税挤占或排挤社会偏好,就必须对其进行调整,以实现既定目标。此外,当城市建筑环境改变出行偏好时,如果忽视这种影响,低碳基础设施投资的价值可能会被低估。第三,政策引发的对积极出行和植物性饮食偏好的改变可能会增加向零排放过渡的净收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Resource and Energy Economics provides a forum for high level economic analysis of utilization and development of the earth natural resources. The subject matter encompasses questions of optimal production and consumption affecting energy, minerals, land, air and water, and includes analysis of firm and industry behavior, environmental issues and public policies. Implications for both developed and developing countries are of concern. The journal publishes high quality papers for an international audience. Innovative energy, resource and environmental analyses, including theoretical models and empirical studies are appropriate for publication in Resource and Energy Economics.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Observability and stakeholder conflict in resources management Accounting for baseline individual and site characteristics when estimating recreational demand for specialized activities Spreading the word! Effects of a randomized normative informational campaign on residential water conservation Delegation of environmental regulation and perceived corruption in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1