Seizing Nuclear Tehran: Obstacles to Understanding Iranian Nuclear Activities

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES Middle East Journal Pub Date : 2022-08-31 DOI:10.3751/76.2.11
Clément Therme, Kjølv Egeland, Hebatalla Taha
{"title":"Seizing Nuclear Tehran: Obstacles to Understanding Iranian Nuclear Activities","authors":"Clément Therme, Kjølv Egeland, Hebatalla Taha","doi":"10.3751/76.2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In this article, we interrogate some of the central assumptions in the literature on Iran's nuclear behavior, including the role of the United States as a benevolent hegemon, the revisionist character of the Iranian government, the utility and efficacy of sanctions, and the widespread assumption that Iran is bent on obtaining and even using the bomb. We maintain that contemporary debates on the Iranian nuclear issue display similarities to Kremlinology during the Cold War, being deeply politicized and subject to bias and self-censorship. We conclude by highlighting ways for scholars to recast the discussion.","PeriodicalId":18627,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal","volume":"76 1","pages":"159 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3751/76.2.11","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:In this article, we interrogate some of the central assumptions in the literature on Iran's nuclear behavior, including the role of the United States as a benevolent hegemon, the revisionist character of the Iranian government, the utility and efficacy of sanctions, and the widespread assumption that Iran is bent on obtaining and even using the bomb. We maintain that contemporary debates on the Iranian nuclear issue display similarities to Kremlinology during the Cold War, being deeply politicized and subject to bias and self-censorship. We conclude by highlighting ways for scholars to recast the discussion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
夺取核武器德黑兰:理解伊朗核活动的障碍
摘要:在这篇文章中,我们质疑了文献中关于伊朗核行为的一些核心假设,包括美国作为仁慈的霸主的角色、伊朗政府的修正主义性质、制裁的效用和效力,以及伊朗一心想获得甚至使用核弹的普遍假设。我们坚持认为,当代关于伊朗核问题的辩论与冷战时期的克里姆林宫学说相似,被严重政治化,并受到偏见和自我审查。最后,我们强调了学者们重新进行讨论的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Middle East Journal
Middle East Journal AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
Rethinking Islamophobia: Race, Empire, and Islam in a Global Context Modern History and Politics: The Muslim Brotherhood: Ideology, History, Descendants, by Joas Wagemakers (book review) From the Mountains to the Élysée: The Precarious International Legitimacy of the Syrian Kurdish YPG and PYD A Wall of Despair: The Interplay of the Turkish Wall and Foreign Policy in Syria )Egypt: Revolution, Failed Transition and Counter-Revolution (book review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1