Prioritising the cultural inclusivity of a rural mainstream health service for First Nation Australians: an analysis of discourse and power

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Sociology Review Pub Date : 2018-05-18 DOI:10.1080/14461242.2018.1474720
C. Malatzky, R. Nixon, Olivia Mitchell, L. Bourke
{"title":"Prioritising the cultural inclusivity of a rural mainstream health service for First Nation Australians: an analysis of discourse and power","authors":"C. Malatzky, R. Nixon, Olivia Mitchell, L. Bourke","doi":"10.1080/14461242.2018.1474720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the context of persisting health inequities within many multicultural and socially diverse countries like Australia, there is a call for health services to implement culturally inclusive systems and practices. Nowhere is this more important than in regional, rural and remote Australia where consumers are diverse, health services are scarce, and services designed for particular groups of the population are lacking. Drawing on interviews with 20 staff of a rurally-based, mainstream community health service, this article examines the role of discourse in the transition to a culturally inclusive health centre. In doing so, the power struggles inherent in such a process are highlighted. The article contends that improvements in the health outcomes of First Nation and culturally Other groups within the Australian population is contingent upon systematic resistances that disrupt and re-arrange existing dominant discourses. This calls for a disruption of current race relations in both broader social fields as well as those supporting biomedical assumptions about the delivery of healthcare in the mainstream health sector. Alternative discourses must be promoted in both these fields.","PeriodicalId":46833,"journal":{"name":"Health Sociology Review","volume":"27 1","pages":"248 - 262"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14461242.2018.1474720","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Sociology Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2018.1474720","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the context of persisting health inequities within many multicultural and socially diverse countries like Australia, there is a call for health services to implement culturally inclusive systems and practices. Nowhere is this more important than in regional, rural and remote Australia where consumers are diverse, health services are scarce, and services designed for particular groups of the population are lacking. Drawing on interviews with 20 staff of a rurally-based, mainstream community health service, this article examines the role of discourse in the transition to a culturally inclusive health centre. In doing so, the power struggles inherent in such a process are highlighted. The article contends that improvements in the health outcomes of First Nation and culturally Other groups within the Australian population is contingent upon systematic resistances that disrupt and re-arrange existing dominant discourses. This calls for a disruption of current race relations in both broader social fields as well as those supporting biomedical assumptions about the delivery of healthcare in the mainstream health sector. Alternative discourses must be promoted in both these fields.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优先考虑澳大利亚原住民农村主流医疗服务的文化包容性:话语和权力分析
摘要在澳大利亚等许多多元文化和社会多元化国家持续存在健康不平等的背景下,有人呼吁卫生服务部门实施文化包容性的制度和做法。这一点在澳大利亚的地区、农村和偏远地区最为重要,那里的消费者多样化,医疗服务稀缺,缺乏为特定人群设计的服务。本文通过对20名农村主流社区卫生服务机构工作人员的采访,探讨了话语在向文化包容性卫生中心过渡中的作用。在这样做的过程中,这种过程中固有的权力斗争凸显出来。文章认为,澳大利亚人口中第一民族和其他文化群体的健康结果的改善取决于系统性抵抗,这些抵抗破坏和重新安排了现有的主导话语。这要求打破当前更广泛的社会领域中的种族关系,以及那些支持主流卫生部门提供医疗保健的生物医学假设的种族关系。必须在这两个领域推广另类话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: An international, scholarly peer-reviewed journal, Health Sociology Review explores the contribution of sociology and sociological research methods to understanding health and illness; to health policy, promotion and practice; and to equity, social justice, social policy and social work. Health Sociology Review is published in association with The Australian Sociological Association (TASA) under the editorship of Eileen Willis. Health Sociology Review publishes original theoretical and research articles, literature reviews, special issues, symposia, commentaries and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
On comfort in palliative care. Multidisciplinary team meetings: dynamic routines that (re)make palliative care. Empathetic knowledge: conceptualising modes of knowing within families marked by illness. Orchestrating rhythms in autism care: enacting parental expertise in and through time. Sampling and recruiting LGBTQ+ populations in health research: reflections on community consultations about antibiotic resistant STIs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1