The iron cage of the music teaching profession: A multi-case study on how primary music teachers in Spain understand bureaucracy

IF 1.3 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Music Education Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1177/02557614231196594
Daniel Mateos-Moreno, Paloma Bravo-Fuentes
{"title":"The iron cage of the music teaching profession: A multi-case study on how primary music teachers in Spain understand bureaucracy","authors":"Daniel Mateos-Moreno, Paloma Bravo-Fuentes","doi":"10.1177/02557614231196594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite being an unavoidable part of the music teaching profession, bureaucracy remains an under-studied and ill-defined topic in the research literature. However, its investigation may benefit the music teaching profession by re-thinking policy, informing music teacher education programmes and fostering a mutual understanding among music teachers and policymakers. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to investigate the understandings of Spanish music teachers in relation to bureaucracy and to compare these with the views of the teachers of other subjects in primary education. The perspective of purposefully selected music teachers were thus explored in-depth and contrasted with the views of their counterparts in a multiple case-study design. Our findings contribute a taxonomy of bureaucracy in the music teaching profession. Additionally, we conclude that the views of our music teacher participants on bureaucracy are mainly negative and slightly more pessimistic than those of their counterparts. In discussing our results, we connect these views with the Weberian ‘iron cage’ of bureaucracy and Arendt’s ‘government of Nobody’ as a substitute for democracy in governing education. Finally, we hypothesise a dystopic future of deprofessionalisation as a result of these primary music teachers’ declared lack of control over their own organisational tasks.","PeriodicalId":46623,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Music Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Music Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02557614231196594","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite being an unavoidable part of the music teaching profession, bureaucracy remains an under-studied and ill-defined topic in the research literature. However, its investigation may benefit the music teaching profession by re-thinking policy, informing music teacher education programmes and fostering a mutual understanding among music teachers and policymakers. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to investigate the understandings of Spanish music teachers in relation to bureaucracy and to compare these with the views of the teachers of other subjects in primary education. The perspective of purposefully selected music teachers were thus explored in-depth and contrasted with the views of their counterparts in a multiple case-study design. Our findings contribute a taxonomy of bureaucracy in the music teaching profession. Additionally, we conclude that the views of our music teacher participants on bureaucracy are mainly negative and slightly more pessimistic than those of their counterparts. In discussing our results, we connect these views with the Weberian ‘iron cage’ of bureaucracy and Arendt’s ‘government of Nobody’ as a substitute for democracy in governing education. Finally, we hypothesise a dystopic future of deprofessionalisation as a result of these primary music teachers’ declared lack of control over their own organisational tasks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
音乐教学专业的铁笼:西班牙小学音乐教师如何理解官僚主义的多案例研究
尽管是音乐教学专业中不可避免的一部分,但在研究文献中,官僚主义仍然是一个研究不足且定义不清的主题。然而,它的调查可以通过重新思考政策,为音乐教师教育计划提供信息,促进音乐教师和政策制定者之间的相互理解,从而使音乐教学行业受益。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在调查西班牙音乐教师对官僚主义的理解,并将其与小学教育中其他学科教师的观点进行比较。通过多案例研究设计,深入探讨了有目的选择的音乐教师的视角,并与音乐教师的视角进行了对比。我们的发现有助于对音乐教学专业中的官僚主义进行分类。此外,我们得出结论,我们的音乐教师参与者对官僚主义的看法主要是消极的,比他们的同行略悲观。在讨论我们的结果时,我们将这些观点与韦伯的官僚主义“铁笼”和阿伦特的“无人政府”联系起来,将其作为管理教育的民主的替代品。最后,我们假设了一个反乌托邦式的去专业化的未来,因为这些小学音乐教师宣称缺乏对自己组织任务的控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Music Education (IJME) is a peer-reviewed journal published by the International Society for Music Education (ISME) four times a year. Manuscripts published are scholarly works, representing empirical research in a variety of modalities. They enhance knowledge regarding the teaching and learning of music with a special interest toward an international constituency. Manuscripts report results of quantitative or qualitative research studies, summarize bodies or research, present theories, models, or philosophical positions, etc. Papers show relevance to advancing the practice of music teaching and learning at all age levels with issues of direct concern to the classroom or studio, in school and out, private and group instruction. All manuscripts should contain evidence of a scholarly approach and be situated within the current literature. Implications for learning and teaching of music should be clearly stated, relevant, contemporary, and of interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
Extension of the 3 × 2 achievement goal model to university concert band performance Teaching free improvisation: European higher music education teachers’ conceptual tools The ‘professional digital competence’: Exploring the perspective of primary music teachers in Spain Exploring music integration: Early childhood and elementary teacher practices Where is Mi Gente? Codeswitching (Afro)Latinidad in the music classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1