Protest by candlelight: A comparative analysis of candlelight vigils in South Korea

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Civil Society Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/17448689.2020.1794508
Injeong Hwang, Charmaine N. Willis
{"title":"Protest by candlelight: A comparative analysis of candlelight vigils in South Korea","authors":"Injeong Hwang, Charmaine N. Willis","doi":"10.1080/17448689.2020.1794508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n Protest activist leaders must make a series of decisions about the strategies they use; one such decision is the choice of tactic or performance, often informed by their cultural historic contentious repertoire. In South Korea's contentious repertoire, the use of candlelight vigils has become an increasingly prevalent form of protest tactic. Candlelight vigils have become an increasingly prominent tactic in South Korea’s repertoire over the last two decades, as evidenced by major candlelight vigils in 2002, 2008, and 2016-2017. In this study, we explore the ways in which candlelight vigils as a protest tactic have evolved over time in South Korea. We notably find that vigils emerged as a left-wing protest tactic in 2002, but right-wing protesters began adopting the tactic during the counter-protests opposing President Park Geun-Hye’s impeachment in 2016–2017 (Taegeukgi Giphoei). Additionally, we find that candlelight vigils drew participants from an increasingly wide swath of society over time and average citizens assumed greater organizational roles. This research not only contributes to the literature on South Korean social movements and civil society, but to understanding candlelight vigils as a distinct form of protest and how contentious repertoires evolve over time more broadly.","PeriodicalId":46013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Society","volume":"16 1","pages":"260 - 272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17448689.2020.1794508","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2020.1794508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT Protest activist leaders must make a series of decisions about the strategies they use; one such decision is the choice of tactic or performance, often informed by their cultural historic contentious repertoire. In South Korea's contentious repertoire, the use of candlelight vigils has become an increasingly prevalent form of protest tactic. Candlelight vigils have become an increasingly prominent tactic in South Korea’s repertoire over the last two decades, as evidenced by major candlelight vigils in 2002, 2008, and 2016-2017. In this study, we explore the ways in which candlelight vigils as a protest tactic have evolved over time in South Korea. We notably find that vigils emerged as a left-wing protest tactic in 2002, but right-wing protesters began adopting the tactic during the counter-protests opposing President Park Geun-Hye’s impeachment in 2016–2017 (Taegeukgi Giphoei). Additionally, we find that candlelight vigils drew participants from an increasingly wide swath of society over time and average citizens assumed greater organizational roles. This research not only contributes to the literature on South Korean social movements and civil society, but to understanding candlelight vigils as a distinct form of protest and how contentious repertoires evolve over time more broadly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
烛光示威:韩国烛光示威的比较分析
抗议活动领导人必须就他们所使用的策略做出一系列决定;其中一个决定是战术或表演的选择,通常是由他们的文化历史上有争议的曲目决定的。在韩国有争议的抗议活动中,烛光守夜已经成为一种越来越普遍的抗议策略。2002年、2008年、2016年至2017年的大型烛光示威就是明证,在过去的20年里,烛光示威在韩国已成为一种越来越突出的策略。在这项研究中,我们探讨了烛光守夜作为一种抗议策略在韩国随着时间的推移而演变的方式。值得注意的是,守夜在2002年作为左翼抗议策略出现,但右翼抗议者在2016-2017年反对弹劾朴槿惠总统的反抗议活动(太极旗抗争)中开始采用这种策略。此外,我们发现,随着时间的推移,烛光守夜吸引了越来越广泛的社会参与者,普通公民承担了更大的组织角色。这项研究不仅有助于韩国社会运动和公民社会的文献,而且有助于理解烛光守夜作为一种独特的抗议形式,以及有争议的剧目如何随着时间的推移而更广泛地演变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Civil Society
Journal of Civil Society POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Youth worldlessness and civic participation online and at school: Exploring Arendt’s philosophy Beyond the Immediate Effects of COVID-19: Exploring the Consequences of the Pandemic on the Southern NGO Partners of Dutch INGOs Renegotiating state-third sector relations through collaborative partnerships: The case of reception services for asylum-seeking children in Gothenburg, Sweden Consultation not Contestation : Brazilian civil society in EU-Mercosur Association Agreement negotiations Faith standing out? Discovering the particularities of faith-based antitrafficking organizations in Thailand and Cambodia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1