Psychology Data from an Exploration of the Effect of Anticipatory Stress on Disgust vs. Non-Disgust Related Moral Judgments

A. E. van 't Veer, Willem W. A. Sleegers
{"title":"Psychology Data from an Exploration of the Effect of Anticipatory Stress on Disgust vs. Non-Disgust Related Moral Judgments","authors":"A. E. van 't Veer, Willem W. A. Sleegers","doi":"10.5334/JOPD.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this lab-based experiment (N = 185) we tested the effect of anticipatory stress on moral condemnation. The data covers severity ratings for vignettes of two content types: vignettes with an inherent disgust-eliciting element (e.g., eating human flesh) and without (e.g., lying on a resume). Participants in the anticipatory stress condition rated the vignettes as more morally wrong, and disgust-eliciting vignettes were rated as more morally wrong. No moderation by disgust content was found. Private Body Consciousness (PBC) was positively associated with condemnation for disgust- eliciting vignettes (but not with non-disgust-eliciting vignettes). The data can be used, for example, in research on incidental vs. inherent emotions, to identify the strength of induced emotions on judgments, and to identify moderators (e.g., PBC).","PeriodicalId":91028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of open psychology data","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of open psychology data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/JOPD.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this lab-based experiment (N = 185) we tested the effect of anticipatory stress on moral condemnation. The data covers severity ratings for vignettes of two content types: vignettes with an inherent disgust-eliciting element (e.g., eating human flesh) and without (e.g., lying on a resume). Participants in the anticipatory stress condition rated the vignettes as more morally wrong, and disgust-eliciting vignettes were rated as more morally wrong. No moderation by disgust content was found. Private Body Consciousness (PBC) was positively associated with condemnation for disgust- eliciting vignettes (but not with non-disgust-eliciting vignettes). The data can be used, for example, in research on incidental vs. inherent emotions, to identify the strength of induced emotions on judgments, and to identify moderators (e.g., PBC).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预期压力对厌恶与非厌恶相关道德判断影响的心理学数据
在这个实验室实验中(N = 185),我们测试了预期压力对道德谴责的影响。这些数据涵盖了两种内容类型的小片段的严重性等级:带有固有的令人厌恶的元素(例如,吃人肉)和没有(例如,在简历上撒谎)的小片段。预期应激条件下的参与者认为这些小插曲在道德上更错误,而引起厌恶的小插曲被认为在道德上更错误。没有发现厌恶内容的调节作用。私人身体意识(PBC)与对引起厌恶的小片段的谴责呈正相关(但与非引起厌恶的小片段无关)。例如,这些数据可用于偶然情绪与固有情绪的研究,以确定诱发情绪对判断的强度,并确定调节因子(如PBC)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Data from “A Registered Report Testing the Effect of Sleep on DRM False Memory: Greater Lure and Veridical Recall but Fewer Intrusions After Sleep” Data from the Paper Entitled “Application of a Bayesian Approach for Exploring the Impact of Syllable Frequency in Handwritten Picture Naming” A New Procedure and Stimulus Set for Examining Cross-Modality Mental Rotation Preliminary Data from the Small World of Singlish Words Project: Examining Responses to Common Singlish Words A Dataset of 108 Novel Noun-Noun Compound Words with Active and Passive Interpretation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1