Liberalization and the volatility of gas prices: Exploring their relation in times of abundance and scarcity

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Competition and Regulation in Network Industries Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1177/17835917231180839
Roberto Cardinale
{"title":"Liberalization and the volatility of gas prices: Exploring their relation in times of abundance and scarcity","authors":"Roberto Cardinale","doi":"10.1177/17835917231180839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agencies and analysts attribute the current volatility of natural gas prices to a temporary convergence of exogenous shocks such as the post-COVID-19 economic recovery and the conflict in Ukraine. This paper hypothesizes that long-term structural and policy factors endogenous to the energy sector also play a relevant role. Through a case study of three major gas markets – UK, US, and EU – the paper finds that countries characterized by abundant domestic production are less exposed to price volatility as they benefit from lower market uncertainty and asset specificity. This encourages energy firms to outsource production and rely on more flexible and shorter-term contracts. A structural condition of abundance supported by liberalization policies and a developed infrastructure network allows energy firms to easily switch suppliers or buyers without being exposed to the opportunistic behavior of the commercial counterparty, increasing market competition and reducing prices. By contrast, import-dependent countries face greater uncertainty and asset specificity, as supplies and prices are not guaranteed and they heavily depend from trends in international markets. In this context, the contractual and structural flexibility brought about by liberalization policies may expose to further insecurity of supply and volatility of prices, as exporters are contractually disengaged from commitments on volumes and prices. In periods of international scarcity, they may redirect supplies to importers that offer a premium in price. This suggests that import-dependent countries could reduce their exposure to price volatility (i) by increasing domestic production (ii) while envisaging the coexistence of contractual models based on both market competition and vertical integration, to take advantage from low spot prices in periods of international abundance and contain the surge in periods of scarcity.","PeriodicalId":38329,"journal":{"name":"Competition and Regulation in Network Industries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competition and Regulation in Network Industries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17835917231180839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Agencies and analysts attribute the current volatility of natural gas prices to a temporary convergence of exogenous shocks such as the post-COVID-19 economic recovery and the conflict in Ukraine. This paper hypothesizes that long-term structural and policy factors endogenous to the energy sector also play a relevant role. Through a case study of three major gas markets – UK, US, and EU – the paper finds that countries characterized by abundant domestic production are less exposed to price volatility as they benefit from lower market uncertainty and asset specificity. This encourages energy firms to outsource production and rely on more flexible and shorter-term contracts. A structural condition of abundance supported by liberalization policies and a developed infrastructure network allows energy firms to easily switch suppliers or buyers without being exposed to the opportunistic behavior of the commercial counterparty, increasing market competition and reducing prices. By contrast, import-dependent countries face greater uncertainty and asset specificity, as supplies and prices are not guaranteed and they heavily depend from trends in international markets. In this context, the contractual and structural flexibility brought about by liberalization policies may expose to further insecurity of supply and volatility of prices, as exporters are contractually disengaged from commitments on volumes and prices. In periods of international scarcity, they may redirect supplies to importers that offer a premium in price. This suggests that import-dependent countries could reduce their exposure to price volatility (i) by increasing domestic production (ii) while envisaging the coexistence of contractual models based on both market competition and vertical integration, to take advantage from low spot prices in periods of international abundance and contain the surge in periods of scarcity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自由化和天然气价格的波动:探索它们在丰富和稀缺时期的关系
机构和分析师将当前天然气价格的波动归因于外部冲击的暂时收敛,如新冠肺炎疫情后的经济复苏和乌克兰冲突。本文假设,能源部门内生的长期结构和政策因素也发挥了相关作用。通过对英国、美国和欧盟三个主要天然气市场的案例研究,论文发现,国内产量丰富的国家较少受到价格波动的影响,因为它们受益于较低的市场不确定性和资产特异性。这鼓励能源公司将生产外包,并依赖更灵活、更短期的合同。自由化政策和发达的基础设施网络支持的丰富的结构性条件使能源公司能够轻松地更换供应商或买家,而不会受到商业对手的机会主义行为的影响,从而增加市场竞争并降低价格。相比之下,依赖进口的国家面临着更大的不确定性和资产的特殊性,因为供应和价格没有保障,而且它们严重依赖国际市场的趋势。在这种情况下,自由化政策带来的合同和结构灵活性可能导致供应进一步不安全和价格波动,因为出口商在合同上不履行对数量和价格的承诺。在国际稀缺时期,他们可能会将供应转向价格溢价的进口商。这表明,依赖进口的国家可以通过增加国内生产来减少价格波动的风险,同时设想基于市场竞争和垂直一体化的合同模式共存,以利用国际富裕时期的低现货价格,并遏制稀缺时期的激增。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Competition and Regulation in Network Industries
Competition and Regulation in Network Industries Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Regulatory lag, efficiency, and performance. Lessons from a case study Legal and ownership unbundling in the Turkish natural gas market: A comparative analysis Network utility price regulation in Australia in the pre-first world war years Experimenting with co-ownership of energy storage facilities - A case study of the Netherlands Strategic interaction between wholesale and ancillary service markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1