Public Space in Different Cultural Conditions: The Cases of Glasgow and Poznań

IF 1 Q3 GEOGRAPHY Quaestiones Geographicae Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.14746/quageo-2023-0019
Wojciech Ewertowski
{"title":"Public Space in Different Cultural Conditions: The Cases of Glasgow and Poznań","authors":"Wojciech Ewertowski","doi":"10.14746/quageo-2023-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Public spaces are among the most important components of the contemporary city. They are supposed to be places of vibrant social life, where a broad set of activities and behaviours can be observed. However, the role of public spaces as well as their spatial features can differ in various societies. The built environment, as a human creation, is affected by many social factors and one of them is culture. Thus, cultural conditions can have an impact on how urban space is created, perceived, and used. Those differences are most clearly visible in distant cultures, but they may occur to a greater or lesser extent within a single culture circle. Public spaces, because of their accessibility, egalitarianism, and wide range of users are especially useful as an area of research on the relationship between space and culture. This paper presents differences between Glasgow (United Kingdom) and Poznań (Poland) in the perception and attitude towards urban public space concerning cultural conditions. The theoretical background of the relations between space and culture, and the contemporary views of public space are discussed. Afterwards, the results of the survey study conducted in both cities are presented. The research results are discussed in the context of cultural differences derived from the cultural models and show that cultural dimensions can be used to explain the activity of users of urban public spaces. They also indicate that the variety in behaviour patterns and approaches to public space can be observed within the European cultural circle.","PeriodicalId":46433,"journal":{"name":"Quaestiones Geographicae","volume":"42 1","pages":"115 - 129"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaestiones Geographicae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2023-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Public spaces are among the most important components of the contemporary city. They are supposed to be places of vibrant social life, where a broad set of activities and behaviours can be observed. However, the role of public spaces as well as their spatial features can differ in various societies. The built environment, as a human creation, is affected by many social factors and one of them is culture. Thus, cultural conditions can have an impact on how urban space is created, perceived, and used. Those differences are most clearly visible in distant cultures, but they may occur to a greater or lesser extent within a single culture circle. Public spaces, because of their accessibility, egalitarianism, and wide range of users are especially useful as an area of research on the relationship between space and culture. This paper presents differences between Glasgow (United Kingdom) and Poznań (Poland) in the perception and attitude towards urban public space concerning cultural conditions. The theoretical background of the relations between space and culture, and the contemporary views of public space are discussed. Afterwards, the results of the survey study conducted in both cities are presented. The research results are discussed in the context of cultural differences derived from the cultural models and show that cultural dimensions can be used to explain the activity of users of urban public spaces. They also indicate that the variety in behaviour patterns and approaches to public space can be observed within the European cultural circle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同文化条件下的公共空间:以格拉斯哥和波兹纳斯为例
公共空间是当代城市最重要的组成部分之一。它们应该是充满活力的社会生活场所,在那里可以观察到各种各样的活动和行为。然而,公共空间的作用及其空间特征在不同的社会中是不同的。建筑环境作为人类创造的产物,受到许多社会因素的影响,其中之一就是文化。因此,文化条件可以对城市空间的创造、感知和使用方式产生影响。这些差异在遥远的文化中最为明显,但在单一文化圈内,它们可能或多或少地出现。公共空间由于其可达性、平等性和广泛的用户范围而成为研究空间与文化关系的一个特别有用的领域。本文介绍了英国格拉斯哥和波兰波兹纳齐在文化条件下对城市公共空间的感知和态度上的差异。讨论了空间与文化关系的理论背景,以及当代公共空间观。然后,给出了在两个城市进行的调查研究的结果。研究结果在文化模型衍生的文化差异背景下进行了讨论,表明文化维度可以用来解释城市公共空间用户的活动。它们还表明,在欧洲文化圈内可以观察到行为模式和公共空间方法的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Quaestiones Geographicae was established in 1974 as an annual journal of the Institute of Geography, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland. Its founder and first editor was Professor Stefan Kozarski. Initially the scope of the journal covered issues in both physical and socio-economic geography; since 1982, exclusively physical geography. In 2006 there appeared the idea of a return to the original conception of the journal, although in a somewhat modified organisational form. Quaestiones Geographicae publishes research results of wide interest in the following fields: •physical geography, •economic and human geography, •spatial management and planning,
期刊最新文献
Landscape in Change – Place in Uncertainty. A Case Study of Detachment Management of Giant Cell Tumor of the Hyoid bone- A rare Clinical Entity with Review of Literature. Gender-Specific Preferences Regarding Urban Green Areas The Role of a Green Economy in Revitalising Shrinking Cities: Comparative Case Studies in France and Mexico Studying at Higher Education Institutions in Poland as Seen by Students with Disabilities in the Context of the Geographical Model of Disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1