Noticeboard

IF 0.7 2区 社会学 Q2 LAW International Journal of Evidence & Proof Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1365712719893190
M. Plaxton
{"title":"Noticeboard","authors":"M. Plaxton","doi":"10.1177/1365712719893190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rachel Ormston, Professor James Chalmers, Professor Fiona Leverick, Professor Vanessa Munro, Lorraine Murray, Scottish Jury Research: Findings From A Large-Scale Mock Jury Study (Scottish Government, October 2019), https://www.gov.scot/publications/scottish-jury-research-fingings-largemock-jury-study-2/ This important study was commissioned by the Scottish government to better appreciate (a) how “the unique features of the Scottish jury system [affect] jury reasoning and jury decision making”; and (b) how jurors make sense of the “not proven” verdict’, and choose between that verdict as opposed to others. This is the largest mock jury study ever conducted in the United Kingdom, as may well be the most realistic. The key “overarching” finding is that the way in which the jury system is “constructed” makes an important difference to jury verdicts.","PeriodicalId":54168,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Evidence & Proof","volume":"24 1","pages":"100 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1365712719893190","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Evidence & Proof","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712719893190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rachel Ormston, Professor James Chalmers, Professor Fiona Leverick, Professor Vanessa Munro, Lorraine Murray, Scottish Jury Research: Findings From A Large-Scale Mock Jury Study (Scottish Government, October 2019), https://www.gov.scot/publications/scottish-jury-research-fingings-largemock-jury-study-2/ This important study was commissioned by the Scottish government to better appreciate (a) how “the unique features of the Scottish jury system [affect] jury reasoning and jury decision making”; and (b) how jurors make sense of the “not proven” verdict’, and choose between that verdict as opposed to others. This is the largest mock jury study ever conducted in the United Kingdom, as may well be the most realistic. The key “overarching” finding is that the way in which the jury system is “constructed” makes an important difference to jury verdicts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布告栏
Rachel Ormston, James Chalmers教授,Fiona Leverick教授,Vanessa Munro教授,Lorraine Murray,苏格兰陪审团研究:大规模模拟陪审团研究的结果(苏格兰政府,2019年10月),https://www.gov.scot/publications/scottish-jury-research-fingings-largemock-jury-study-2/这项重要的研究由苏格兰政府委托,以更好地理解(A)“苏格兰陪审团制度的独特性如何影响陪审团推理和陪审团决策”;(b)陪审员如何理解“未经证实的”裁决,并在该裁决和其他裁决之间做出选择。这是英国有史以来规模最大的模拟陪审团研究,也可能是最现实的。关键的“总体”发现是,陪审团制度的“构建”方式对陪审团的裁决有重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Preponderance, proportionality, stepwise liability Stepwise liability: Between the preponderance rule and proportional liability The skewing effect of outcome evidence The economic case for conviction multiplicity What matters for assessing insider witnesses? Results of an experimental vignette study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1