Construction of an evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers using the Delphi method

Shi-Fan Han , Rui-Fang Zhu , Jin-Lian Cheng , Yan Cao
{"title":"Construction of an evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers using the Delphi method","authors":"Shi-Fan Han ,&nbsp;Rui-Fang Zhu ,&nbsp;Jin-Lian Cheng ,&nbsp;Yan Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.cnre.2017.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The goal of this study was to construct an evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 17 nursing experts were consulted for two rounds, and the reliability and weight of the constructed evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers were determined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>An evaluation system for the innovativeness of nursing papers was constructed, including 3 primary indexes, 8 secondary indexes, 14 tertiary indexes, and 8 quaternary indexes. The 3 primary indexes with their weights were new argument (0.547), new evidence (0.345), and new conclusion (0.109).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The representativeness, the enthusiasm for the study, the degree of authority, the degree of coordination, and the convergence of the experts were high; therefore, an evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers based on the Delphi method can comprehensively and scientifically evaluate the innovativeness of nursing papers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":57172,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cnre.2017.07.002","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095771817300622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective

The goal of this study was to construct an evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers.

Methods

A total of 17 nursing experts were consulted for two rounds, and the reliability and weight of the constructed evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers were determined.

Results

An evaluation system for the innovativeness of nursing papers was constructed, including 3 primary indexes, 8 secondary indexes, 14 tertiary indexes, and 8 quaternary indexes. The 3 primary indexes with their weights were new argument (0.547), new evidence (0.345), and new conclusion (0.109).

Conclusions

The representativeness, the enthusiasm for the study, the degree of authority, the degree of coordination, and the convergence of the experts were high; therefore, an evaluation index system for the innovativeness of nursing papers based on the Delphi method can comprehensively and scientifically evaluate the innovativeness of nursing papers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用德尔菲法构建护理论文创新性评价指标体系
目的构建护理论文创新性评价指标体系。方法对17名护理专家进行2轮咨询,确定构建的护理论文创新评价指标体系的信度和权重。结果构建了护理论文创新性评价体系,包括3个一级指标、8个二级指标、14个三级指标和8个四级指标。3个主要指标及其权重分别为新论点(0.547)、新证据(0.345)和新结论(0.109)。结论专家的代表性、研究积极性、权威性、协调性、收敛性较高;因此,基于德尔菲法的护理论文创新性评价指标体系能够全面、科学地评价护理论文的创新性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
353
期刊最新文献
医院新型冠状病毒感染疑似病例标准化 转运流程的制定及应用 Leadership theory in clinical practice A study on clinical nursing research trends and hotspots based on bibliometric analysis Perceived health-related stigma among patients with breast cancer Cultural barriers lead to inequitable healthcare access for aboriginal Australians and Torres Strait Islanders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1