{"title":"Pastures, crops, and inequality: Questioning the inverse relationship between farm size and productivity in Colombia","authors":"Shawn Van Ausdal","doi":"10.24215/15155994e134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Colombian countryside has long been dominated by grass and inequality. Economic theory (i.e., the inverse relationship between farm size and productivity) holds that the monopolization of land by ranchers is irrational since farming is more productive than ranching and small farms often produce more per area than large ones. Traditional explanations for the predominance of grass and the country’s agrarian structure focus on extra-economic coercion and the status associated with owning land and cattle. By contrast, this study explores the relative profitability of ranching and the limitations of peasant agriculture, which generated contrasting capacities to accumulate. It thus suggests that land markets, and the productive advantages of cattle, offer an alternative explanation.","PeriodicalId":42272,"journal":{"name":"Mundo Agrario","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mundo Agrario","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24215/15155994e134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
The Colombian countryside has long been dominated by grass and inequality. Economic theory (i.e., the inverse relationship between farm size and productivity) holds that the monopolization of land by ranchers is irrational since farming is more productive than ranching and small farms often produce more per area than large ones. Traditional explanations for the predominance of grass and the country’s agrarian structure focus on extra-economic coercion and the status associated with owning land and cattle. By contrast, this study explores the relative profitability of ranching and the limitations of peasant agriculture, which generated contrasting capacities to accumulate. It thus suggests that land markets, and the productive advantages of cattle, offer an alternative explanation.
期刊介绍:
Mundo Agrario es una revista electrónica sobre cuestiones rurales en sus aspectos sociales, económicos, políticos y culturales, editada por el Centro de Estudios Histórico Rurales de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Es publicada semestralmente e incluye artículos, comunicaciones y comentarios bibliográficos. Eventualmente publica una sección especial destinada a debates sobre un tema específico. Todos los manuscritos son críticamente revisados por evaluadores acdémicos (revisión por pares). La abreviatura de su título es Mundo Agr., que debe ser usado en bibliografías, notas al pie de página, leyendas y referencias bibliográficas.