The Effect of Decisional Leader Procrastination on Employee Innovation: Investigating the Moderating Role of Employees’ Resistance to Change

IF 5 3区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies Pub Date : 2021-10-25 DOI:10.1177/15480518211044166
T. Haesevoets, D. De Cremer, Giles Hirst, Leander De Schutter, J. Stouten, Marius van Dijke, A. Van Hiel
{"title":"The Effect of Decisional Leader Procrastination on Employee Innovation: Investigating the Moderating Role of Employees’ Resistance to Change","authors":"T. Haesevoets, D. De Cremer, Giles Hirst, Leander De Schutter, J. Stouten, Marius van Dijke, A. Van Hiel","doi":"10.1177/15480518211044166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most prior research has examined procrastination as a type of self-defeating behavior. The present research, however, focused on the social consequences of procrastination, by investigating how decisional leader procrastination as a leader trait affects others in the workplace. We specifically developed the argument that the way in which employees deal with changes plays a critical moderating role in the relationship between leader procrastination and employee innovation. More precisely, we hypothesized that decisional leader procrastination negatively impacts employee innovation, but only so for employees who are low (compared to high) in resistance to change. This prediction was tested in an experimental study (Study 1) and two double-source survey studies (Studies 2 and 3). In support of our prediction, the results showed that an indecisive leader indeed undermines the innovation of those employees who embrace—rather than resist—changes. Critically, however, our findings also illustrated that when being supervised by a decisive leader, these particular employees are actually most likely to bring forward the process of innovation. Theoretical and practical implications of our results are discussed.","PeriodicalId":51455,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":"131 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211044166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Most prior research has examined procrastination as a type of self-defeating behavior. The present research, however, focused on the social consequences of procrastination, by investigating how decisional leader procrastination as a leader trait affects others in the workplace. We specifically developed the argument that the way in which employees deal with changes plays a critical moderating role in the relationship between leader procrastination and employee innovation. More precisely, we hypothesized that decisional leader procrastination negatively impacts employee innovation, but only so for employees who are low (compared to high) in resistance to change. This prediction was tested in an experimental study (Study 1) and two double-source survey studies (Studies 2 and 3). In support of our prediction, the results showed that an indecisive leader indeed undermines the innovation of those employees who embrace—rather than resist—changes. Critically, however, our findings also illustrated that when being supervised by a decisive leader, these particular employees are actually most likely to bring forward the process of innovation. Theoretical and practical implications of our results are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
决策型领导拖延对员工创新的影响——考察员工抗拒变革的调节作用
大多数先前的研究都将拖延症视为一种自我挫败的行为。然而,本研究通过调查决策型领导者拖延症作为一种领导者特质如何影响工作场所的其他人,重点关注拖延症的社会后果。我们特别提出了这样一个论点,即员工处理变化的方式在领导者拖延和员工创新之间的关系中起着关键的调节作用。更准确地说,我们假设决策领导者的拖延会对员工的创新产生负面影响,但只有那些对变革抵抗力较低(与之相比)的员工才会如此。这一预测在一项实验研究(研究1)和两项双源调查研究(研究2和3)中进行了测试。为了支持我们的预测,研究结果表明,优柔寡断的领导者确实会破坏那些接受而不是抵制变革的员工的创新。然而,至关重要的是,我们的研究结果还表明,当受到果断领导者的监督时,这些特定的员工实际上最有可能推进创新过程。讨论了我们的结果的理论和实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Hierarchical Leader-Leader Fit: Examining Authentic Leader Dyads and Implications for Junior Leader Outcomes Does Leaders’ Impression Management Help or Hurt? It Depends on the Perspective of the Follower Wo∼Men and Leadership: Re-Thinking the State of Research on Gender and Leadership Through Waves of Feminist Thinking The Corporate Chief of Staff: Strategic Leadership Influence From Outside the Spotlight Impact of Leadership on Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1