Recommendations for Conceptualizing and Measuring Constructs Within Psychology of Working Theory

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Journal of Career Assessment Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.1177/10690727231179196
Ryan D. Duffy, Y. Choi, Haram J. Kim, Junsang Park
{"title":"Recommendations for Conceptualizing and Measuring Constructs Within Psychology of Working Theory","authors":"Ryan D. Duffy, Y. Choi, Haram J. Kim, Junsang Park","doi":"10.1177/10690727231179196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psychology of Working Theory (PWT) has been increasingly adopted by counseling and vocational psychologists since its inception in 2016, and approximately 100 quantitative studies to date have tested various propositions of the Theory. As a relatively new theory, there has been lack of consistency in how the main constructs are conceptualized and measured by scholars, thus limiting further application of PWT. The following paper is aimed at addressing this inconsistency by providing a guide for researchers interested in using PWT as a theoretical framework in their studies. First, we provide an overview of PWT and the definitions of its core constructs: economic constraints, marginalization, work volition, career adaptability, decent work, and need satisfaction. Then, we review quantitative studies conducted to date to show how each of the constructs have been conceptualized and measured. Finally, we provide specific recommendations that researchers can follow in their future studies based on this review. It is hoped that the recommendations can provide a more streamlined way of measuring the constructs as well as ideas for researchers to expand the psychology of working literature.","PeriodicalId":47978,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Career Assessment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Career Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727231179196","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Psychology of Working Theory (PWT) has been increasingly adopted by counseling and vocational psychologists since its inception in 2016, and approximately 100 quantitative studies to date have tested various propositions of the Theory. As a relatively new theory, there has been lack of consistency in how the main constructs are conceptualized and measured by scholars, thus limiting further application of PWT. The following paper is aimed at addressing this inconsistency by providing a guide for researchers interested in using PWT as a theoretical framework in their studies. First, we provide an overview of PWT and the definitions of its core constructs: economic constraints, marginalization, work volition, career adaptability, decent work, and need satisfaction. Then, we review quantitative studies conducted to date to show how each of the constructs have been conceptualized and measured. Finally, we provide specific recommendations that researchers can follow in their future studies based on this review. It is hoped that the recommendations can provide a more streamlined way of measuring the constructs as well as ideas for researchers to expand the psychology of working literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作心理学理论中构念的概念化和测量建议
工作心理学理论(PWT)自2016年成立以来,越来越多的咨询和职业心理学家采用了它,迄今为止,大约有100项定量研究已经测试了该理论的各种命题。作为一个相对较新的理论,学者们对主要构式的概念化和测量方法缺乏一致性,从而限制了PWT的进一步应用。下面的文章旨在通过为有兴趣在他们的研究中使用PWT作为理论框架的研究人员提供指南来解决这种不一致。首先,我们概述了PWT及其核心结构的定义:经济约束、边缘化、工作意志、职业适应性、体面工作和需求满足。然后,我们回顾了迄今为止进行的定量研究,以显示每个结构是如何概念化和测量的。最后,我们在此综述的基础上提出了研究人员在未来研究中可以遵循的具体建议。希望这些建议可以为研究人员提供一种更精简的测量构念的方法,并为拓展工作文学心理学提供思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Career Assessment
Journal of Career Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
15.60%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The Journal of Career Assessment publishes methodologically sound, empirically based studies focusing on the process and techniques by which counselors and others gain understanding of the individual faced with the necessity of making informed career decisions. The term career assessment, as used in this journal, covers the various techniques, tests, inventories, rating scales, interview schedules, surveys, and direct observational methods used in scientifically based practice and research to provide an improved understanding of career decision-making. The focus is not just testing, but all those means developed and used to assess and evaluate individuals and environments in the field of career counseling and development.
期刊最新文献
Motivational Career Resources and Subjective Career Success: A Test of Mediation and Moderation From Adaptive Readiness to Adaptation Results Testing the Career Construction Model of Adaptation in Chinese Adolescents Youth Perspectives on Decent Education and College and Career Readiness Psychosocial Readiness for College: A Multidimensional Model and Measure for Students Entering College in Their Twenties Disentangling Underemployment and Precarious Work: A Latent Profile Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1